Re: SFail
So, not for you then?
12182 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Apr 2007
DeX is really designed as home/office solution where you take your phone and nothing else with you. The Android desktop experience is still subpar, largely because Google is trying to force feed everyone with ChromOS, but mouse and keyboard work fine and the Remote Desktop thing sounds very intriguing
And Amazon is doing for space communication what it's done for cloud computing
Apart from the tautology, "cloud computing" had increased concentration in the market which ultimately means less choice for users.
Skylink, et al. are examples of the "tragedy of the commons". Removing any kind of regulation to encourage private investment will bring short term riches for first movers but at the expense of everyone else and, eventually, of everyone. It's like overfishing in the skies.
10 years of free security updates
Since when has Windows ever been free?
The current state of affairs is not good, though it has got better but the comparison with Windows is technically invalid due to the contract being the user and Microsoft whereas you just buy a phone from the manufacturer with no contract regarding the OS. It's up to consumers to hold manufacturers acccount.
Apple's approach is indeed exemplary, though it is also easier if you control hardware and software. But it's also clever marketing because replacement cycles are the same if not shorter for Apple's phones, with the promise of timely updates, are part of the value proposition that attracts people to Apple. Of coure, they should also be held to account for their restrictive practices: you can have any browser as long as it's webkit, you can only buy stuff from the Apple store, etc.
Got the update this morning for my S10e so it looks like the work that went into Project Treble in order to be able to push security updates faster has paid off. Yes, this still means millions of phones will be vulnerable but possibly less than the headline might suggest.
What's the chance that the aforementioned hacker would be in your proximity exactly at that moment..
Along with most of the more recent flaws, the risk of some kind of drive by attack is minimal (in comparison with say cars which often can be attacked while driving by) but useful if you can get hold of the device.
Sounds like the company doesn't have a very good setup. FTP may be insecure but is otherwise a very reliable protocol with support for partial transmission and resumption, because at the time connections were generally flaky.
That said, depending on the size of the data being transmitted, hard copies are still often faster.
That's a bit unfair to IBM's engineers. Yes, it used to be like it or lump it, but they were at least engineers and produced properly engineered systems. The real problems were generally caused by management and the bean counters, as in so many big American companies once they become successful.
Red Hat has for years been trying to define RHEL as the Linux for business and has been following similar lock-in strategies as Oracle, Microsoft, et al. And it seems to be working, or at least lots of companies seem happy enough with the value proposition. Which is probably why IBM bought their company.
BlackBerry's software support used to be great but the new devices went EOL very quickly. SWMBO got a DTEK in 2017, OS hasn't had updates since summer 2018.
As for Planet, unfortunately support is even worse: three OS updates since launch of the Gemini and slew of bugs never fixed. I've ended up getting a portable keyboard which I can use with any phone.
I don't think this decision has anything to do with that. The French would quite easily use North Korean kit to piss off the Americans, if it thought it was safe. This the usual French industrial politics: IIRC Nokia got what was left of Alcatel-Lucent's networking kit and, as it's already in use at Orange, sticking with it makes most sense. Ericsson, Nokia and Huawei already cross-license much of the relevant IP so it shouldn't mean too much of a delay. For the technology that nobody in Europe needs right now™ anyway.
A lot of noise about 5G is being made by industry bodies basically looking for handouts.
The biggest problem with the fused design, apart from adding to the size, is that it's useless for the vast majority of devices with insulated cases as it will never be needed.
Otherwise: cable always at 90° to socket and built-in protection against prying fingers are winners.
Take away the phone, though, and all that lovely high margin other stuff would disappear pretty quickly. But Apple has very loyal customers who like the value proposition (this is debatable but understandable) of the phone and don't mind paying over the odds for services and accessories in the generally misplaced hope that they will work better than other off the shelf stuff.
For me, the phone wars are over. Pretty much all the modern phones are fantastic and you now have to look hard to see the difference between Android and IOS – yes, I know there are some telltale signs but at a quick glance it does look they've achieved parity.
I was trying not to reveal my own thoughts about the current situation
But you did and you still do… especially concerning pros and cons of membership and all those potential free trade agreements waiting out there. Many of these are going to require alignment with EU norms not to invalidate existing agreements. The US being a notable exception, of course, because it does not yet have a bilateral trade agreement with the EU.
But, while I might be pessimistic, I don't know how things will turn out. However, as a citizen with dual nationality I'm now of the opinion that the EU should take a hard line in negotiations with the UK, which is increasingly the opinion of my anglophile friends.
Starts with Without particularly revealing my own thoughts on the matter and then In other words rejoining would not return us to the position we were in before 2016 - we would be much weaker and have less autonomy.
In other words conclusion based on speculation. No one really knows where Britain will be in 5 to 10 years or what the EU will look like, but we can assume the debate about membership will continue.
The Grauniad is annoying but, let's face it, it's not top of the lift of publications to avoid or are you going to pretend you can read the Mail or the Express without questioning the sanity of any who choose to read it,
And it's worth remembering by all that it was founded by a businessman to help uncover the Peterloo massacre. Worth remembering to those on the left that not all businessmen are bastards, and those on the right that free trade was once the cry of the working class.
I normally ignore the part entirely and moan to anyone who doesn't sent a proper plaintext part. But, for the purposes of the discussion, Thunderbird offers users the chance to read the HTML and this is a potential attack vector since the code is no longer being actively maintained by Mozilla. I don't follow forks like SeaMonkey so I don't know if the parser is being actively maintained.
They'll need to drop Gecko and much of the UI code if they don't want to take over maintenance of abandoned code and Gecko's important for handling of those awful HTML e-mails that people will insist on sending. It was this maintenance overhead that persuaded Mozilla to abandon Thunderbird.
I recently switched to MailMate on MacOS and FairMail on Android and pay for both: power users will generally be prepared to pay for a good e-mail client. After all, business users happily pay for a shitty e-mail client (Outlook)…
Non-power users don't seem to care because they mainly use messaging, where they'll need to reinvent the wheel.
Ads are probably more successful than you think, this group of commentards is probably unreprsentative. I mean, if they didn't work at all, El Reg would have closed down long ago.
Digital ads are generally compared with direct mail shots which have success rates of around < 5%, I think. Digital ads have success rates of around < 0.1 % for scattergun but this rises as targetting gets more granular, though apparently mainly for political ads (which might explain why many product ads eschew too much targetting), but digital ads only pay for succesfull clicks, whereas direct mail has to pay for all.
This is a simplified, and not wholly accurate view, of the situation that advertisers and content platforms use in their auctions (throw in some game theory as well) when deciding prices.
Even if I believed the security scares about Huawei's routers, I fail to see why there is a problem with 5G all of a sudden. After all, technogically it's mainly just faster 4G but the marketing bods wanted a new label and most of the networks are already running Huawei kit and the sky hasn't fallen in yet.
There's also the problem of: who else can supply the kit? Huawei has working 5G kit, because the Chinese mobile market needs it and they've done the work and filed the patents to make it happen. They've already offered to license the kit so that others can make it, except those still won't be American companies because they lost the ability to make the kit years ago: China is just so much cheaper.. Regulators could always take them up on this and enforce "second-supplier" rules. Theoretically this might drive up costs, but seeing as no one but journos and orange wombata give a shit about 5G at the moment, it's not really an issue. I got my first 4G sim card this week and it's plenty fast enough for me.