Posts by Charlie Clark 12172 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Apr 2007
I don't think code repositories should be the point of enforcement. And, let's be clear: youtube-dl itself does not violate copyright. And, as others have noted, there's nothing in the code that can't be replicated relatively easy or actually break the law.
DMCA granted sweeping powers to rightsholders whilst exempting the platforms that facilitate copyright violation. If YouTube were to have been liable for the copyright violation, things would have developed differently. As it was, the liberal licensing helped establish YouTube's position worldwide and reinforced the largely US cultural hegemony. You could even argue, though I won't, that going after TikTok is an attempt to defend that hegemony.
As things stand, the last few years have shown, that, although copyright violations persist, the market has responded well to subscription models such as Netflix and Spotify. Whether this is good or not for artists is debatable but it does underscore the point that people will pay for convenience, something that Andrew identified early as people moved from CDs to MP3s and I seem to recall some research indicating significant uptick in revenues as well.
You will never entirely get rid of copyright violation, so you need strategies to minimise the suspected loss in income. I've still got cassettes of stuff I recorded off John Peel but at the same time I was buying a lof of music and I've bought more in the last two years than in the previous ten (or possibly twenty), though I don't stream. Pleased to have discovered Bandcamp (15% handling fee) recently to assuage my conscience, though I can also live with the guilt.
But that's not the issue. The DMCA gives copyright holders fairly extensive powers to take stuff down on their say so, whilst indemnifying platforms like YouTube. If YouTube enforced copyright better then it wouldn't be as easy to abuse it. Andrew Orlowski covered this extensively when he was writing here.
Of course, when it comes to music it's difficult to see who stiffs musicians more: the platforms like YouTube or the music labels.
Relying on the User Agent string was always broken, servers shouldn't be using this before deciding which content should be served. Client hints are definitely a more granular approach and can be disabled by the browser. In general, they shouldn't matter but there are cases where they can help in content negotiation.
Apple probably won't bother with them as is the case with much of the newer stuff that it didn't come up with itself.
If the Raspberry Pi people were really interested in an open chip architecture they would never have chosen Broadcom as a supplier. While RISC-V might be an alternative in the future, ARM is currently the better offering because there are so many suppliers: Broadcom, Qualcomm, Samsung, Mediatek, Huawei, etc.
Trump reduced the burden of government and the economy shot off with pent up energy.
In other words: he caused a bubble by reducing corporate taxes even while the Federal Reserve was keeping monetary policy very loose. Along with the national debt, the trade deficit has continued to grow despite all the capricious tarriffs.
And what happened to all the proposed infrastructure spending?
But if that's the case, demand will see to this anyway so there is no need for further regulation. But also analysis would suggest that this could work like football transfer fees and continue to drive up the most expensive employees, whilst not solving the skills shortage caused by a poor education system. This, after all, is the main reason for the programme in the first place.
Besides this isn't policy, but simple electioneering.
That's what I bought mine for. But I had to replace the keyboard twice and still have real issues with the battery running down when the Gemini loses and then can't reestablish the local wifi signal. And now I have problems with the screen. It's still basically a great device but if you need support you'll be in trouble.
My Gemini has recently become essentially unusable with the screen simply shutting down every now and then. No updates of any kind since 2018. Planet's business model of trying to finance everything by cashflow is doomed to failure. It's a pity, because the devices are clever and show lots of promise, but it was more or less bound to happen.
Yes, but lots of decisions are taken like that. And it's not as if it's not possible to infer the weighting that led to a particular outcome, we just need to develop the tools that do this as part of the process. Machine learning will continue to be useful and continue to have its problems.
We'll probably see this is several cases to establish precedent. It's one of the key problems with any system that relies on machine learning to take decisions: while the decision may be sound, the system cannot explain it and decompiling the model to look at the underyling statistical calculations isn't really an option.
I don't think the problem is insoluble so we probably need some court judgements that force companies to commission systems that can "show their working" sufficiently. However, I suspect we'll have plenty of "trade secret" defences along the way.
AI Auditor as the next big thing anyone?
My Windows 10 is pretty vanilla and still running the 2004 version so I don't think this is surprising. Microsoft seems to have some additional heuristics for machines so that not all updates are installed on all machines at once. Quite often there's "Dave, you're not ready for the update yet" message.
None of this is helped by the weird name and numbering scheme: 2004 is 04/20 so April 2020 and 1909 September 2019, I think. If the tried and tested major.minor.patch system is good enough for our fruity overlords at Apple, why isn't it good enough for Microsoft?
Gross margin of 53.1 per cent, a decrease of 5.7 percentage points.
Who else in the industry has anything close to that? Means there's still a way to go, assuming orders don't dry up completely and the margins give them scope to cut prices aggressively if need be.
Of course, they still need to sort out all their other CPU problems as well.
It is easy to do and some countries do it already. If someone is maliciously spoofing then the networks can tell fairly quickly and whichever network is allowing them on can be threatened with a global block if no action is taken.
Except, of course, in places like America, there is essentially no protection against marketing calls and this is by design.
It certainly did use Python but not AFAIK for the web server, otherwise the APIs might be a little less strange. Python was certainly used for the "plumbing" and this is one of the things Google found Python wasn't so good for was the moving of massive amounts of data between systems. It was one of the main drivers behind Go, which compiles nicely and makes certain forms of parallelisation easier. Though it's also true that most companies will never need to do the same kind of thing on anything like the scale that Google does.
Python still is in use because it generally provides good, reliable solutions developed within an acceptable timeframe.
Python does not perform! It eats cpu and memory.
In comparison with? Benchmarks? 10 years ago maybe but that was largely down to how it was used rather than the language itself. Now it has similar requests/sec stats as other languages performing the same tasks, especially if run through the PyPy JIT.
Python is in use in lots of big websites but the server-side, whether it's Python, PHP or whatever, has become much less important than the frontend and the heap of JS frameworks that do most of the rendering directly in the browser.
The MSM has simply become a propaganda machine for whoever pulls the strings.
Hasn't that always been the case? Beaverbrook, Hearst, Berluscon,…
The plant was proposed to be a symbol of foreign investment demonstrating that high tech could be made in America: the I-Phones of tomorrow would still be "designed in California" but "made in Wisconsin" instead of China.
We all knew when the project was announced that it was just a PR wheeze that would lead to any new jobs but would be another subsidy bucket. But I will admit to being depressed by the details with people still being paid to do nothing so that the subsidy still flows. And the details do matter. The US trade deficit is at record levels as its borrowing and the money that has been wasted on this will be missing for other important things such as, I don't know, providing IT equipment and training for schools in Wisconsin.
I think you're givng them too much credit,. While there may be a bit of misdirection here, these are the same policitians who routinely make calls for finding out "what we do best and finding more ways of doing less of it better". (W1A). That's even assuming they can remember the policy they've just announced.
It's not the space on the disk that matters, though on some MacBook Airs that is still at a premium, but the size of the executable affects load time. I, too, have both and would add that OpenOffice has by far the better UI and why I generally prefer to use it. Yes, icons in toolbars are details, but details are important.
Why didn't you revert to the previous release?
Pretty much the biggest problem with LibreOffice, even with the so-called stable version is that it breaks so much stuff. Until the developers realise how bad this is for users they will never find people prepared to pay for a commercial version.
"Move fast and break things" has its place in early development but when it comes to release management "Don't break anything" must be the priority.
When Apple removed the headphone jack from the iPhone, so did everyone else.
Did they? My S10e has a headphone jack and support for an SD-card, and it has a tiny hole rather than a notch. Though I've been using Bluetooth headsets for more 10 years mainly as this avoids cables getting tangled, snagged, etc. And my S5 had wireless charging years before Apple realised they couldn't establish their own Apple Charge™ standard.
Apple makes great phones and compelling packages but, with the exception maybe of the graphics, in terms of hardware has largely be playing catchup for the last five years. But this hardly seems to affect sales (the i-Phone X was a sign of going too far) so they will probably continue to do so.
In 1976 things were different, especially when it came to making speculative investments. Since then the investment industry has got very good at lobbying for its way of doing things: preferential tax treatment, one-sided contracts, secrecy, etc. Things like the JOBS Act were designed specifically to work around existing restrictions so the banks could get in on the act regardless of the risks for their customers because of the agency principle.
The Register 
Biting the hand that feeds IT
Copyright. All rights reserved © 1998–2024
