Re: Meanwhile back in the UK
We should not be afraid of that; we should welcome it, even if it means replying to 300 or 400 e-mails at a time.
Until you do a time and motion study of replying to e-mails.
4945 posts • joined 16 Apr 2007
We should not be afraid of that; we should welcome it, even if it means replying to 300 or 400 e-mails at a time.
Until you do a time and motion study of replying to e-mails.
Slacktivists use technology to assuage their technology-addled and coddled consciences. They play into the hands of the PR brigades who can identify which topics need some well-meaning massaging while the general fuckery is unabated. As long as people are twittering about transgender toilets for sheep, they're not protesting in the streets about the price of food, schools or hospitals.
Taking slackivists seriously is a waste of time and resources. This was cleverly satirised in The News Room which took on the "Occupy Wall Street" protests.
And if you do take slacktivists seriously they won't thank you for it because their goldfish minds will have moved on to the next thing they don't really care about.
You've left me speechless, time for the pub now I think....
Indeed, here's one to get you started.
Many of them still don't "get it".
Sigh. I bet you also believe that "this time it's different"?
iAmazon is in an industry that is ever changing.
Which is industry would that be? And the industry that Apple is in isn't always changing?
Both companies have traditionally fobbed off investors demands for money by pointing at the share price instead of the dividend. This has largely been self-fulfilling. However, at some point the P/E ratio becomes so high that people don't want to play any more and demand cash either as dividends or share buybacks. Amazon is still cheap enough for an activist to get on the board.
I've been arguing for years that the digital services are far more valuable than the no-margin warehousing and delivery shit. The sooner it's split the better.
Are we allowed to include database schemas in this?
httparchive.org is a great resource but I disagreed so fundamentally with nearly all the coding and db decisions that I forked it. One that sticks in the mind is adding an extra column with the hash of a URL instead of adding an index! Dates are also all stored as strings and nothing is normalised.
When people write crap like this is it any wonder they run straight into the arms of snake oil (big data) vendors promising to solve their problems?
I'd be tempted to say that about all PHP code…
Have a BOFH award!
(Don't understand the downvotes)
Windows Phone’s market share peaked at 12 per cent in August 2013, a month before Microsoft’s acquisition of the phones unit was announced.
That 12 % is cherry-picked from sales in particular markets. Worldwide and Windows Phone has never been above 5 %, which is why Nokia thew the towel in.
The numbers quoted about the most popular Lumias would appear to back this up: people are either sticking with what they've got or are moving to Android or IOS. You might expect the typical two-year contract and phone renewal to work in Microsoft's favour: switch to new phone with new OS (Windows 10). But it obviously isn't. Here the lack of compelling new phones, no doubt due to pink slips and lack of investment since the takeover, is going to cause problems.
Well, we've always known he was a cunt. Now we have proof that he's also a twat.
This is so close to contempt of court that he should actually resign.
It's in Caithness which, along with Sutherland, was for a long time part of Norway. That's why the local dialect sounds more like Scandiwegian than Scots.
Redneck logic – you've got to love it. Or run from it!
After all, if Cletus J Shitkicker the 3rd can't have those rights why would they give them to any dodgy foreigners?
You forget: the US does give extra rights to US citizens which makes spying on them technically illegal and is one of the main reasons why GCHQ is so damned big: it is effectively outsourced spying.
Foreigners (let's not bother to call them citizens because in US law they don't have any rights) are fair game all the time.
Well, what will happen when the deadline is reached and no new agreement has been made?
It's likely the floodgates for civil suits will open because precedent has been established. The ECJ has declared the agreement void and the DPAs will have little choice but to enforce it. Otherwise, as Schrems has demonstrated, the courts can be used to enforce it.
Any new agreement will have to be ratified by every member state and that certainly can't happen in time.
So any noises from the negotiators are just PR showing us how hard they are working. Until the fundamental problem is resolve – the EU requires judicial oversight, which the US rejects – then this is going nowhere.
However if you can get something trending it might force a company to do something rather than endure the negative publicity.
So, you're stuck at airport-in-the-middle-of-nowhere venting your spleen about the delay on the interwebs. And this helps how exactly? The vague hope that company X, for reasons of PR, will notice and try and placate you by giving the local staff a kick up the backside? Dream on. Me, I prefer to speak softly to local representatives with the firm threat of legal action if statutory obligations are not fulfilled.
As long as customer service can be considered optional, companies will try to avoid it.
The public nature of social media along with the ratings and medals awarded by the platforms for speed of response make it something companies endevour to act on more quickly than something like email.
When my flight is delayed I don't give a flying fuck about ratings and medals on <insert-platform-here/>, I want to be looked after properly at the airport. It's a fundamental error to confuse PR on social media with customer service.
Thank god we have obligatory minimum standards for delayed flights in Europe!
Twitter has its uses. Once when my flight was delayed it was the fastest and easiest way to get a hold of customer services.
Doesn't that read like an indictment of the airlines customer services? What about those who hadn't shared their flight details with Twitter or didn't have a data connection or even a phone?
Twitter gets lots of praise for its scalability but it's really quite pathetic when put up against what the Telco's SMS-Cs pump 24/7.
I wonder what the severance terms were? Don't normal employees just get a damp handshake and asked to clear their desks? But I'm sure it's a bit more if you make it to exec. Suggestions, please.
If I understand the logic correctly, the argument is that there should be no tax on corporates because it acts as a drag on investment, payroll taxes should be enough. And Amazon is held up as a shining example?
So, let's look at Amazon: up to every legal trick in the book to its tax exposure. It's also up to every trick in the book to squeeze suppliers and employees. Minimum wage, we've heard of it. How does this encourage investment exactly. And then there is the not inconsiderable issue of preferential treatment of capital gains over income (share buybacks over dividends).
Now, I'm actually a big fan of Bezos' digital stuff but that does not mean I endorse his business practices.
Different forms of tax exist because no one form is particularly efficient.
And there are those that suggest it undermines the OECD's attempt to sort out international tax arrangements.
It's just not trying very hard, is it? ;-)
Deals like this, which are driven as much by the US FATCA legislation, as anything else will probably help establish any OECD policy.
I have no love for Oracle but they have managed to get red of many of the bugs that have festered in MySQL for years.
Sure, they want an upgrade path from MySQL cheapskates to juicy Oracle customers ready to be milked but that's business.
In the meantime Monty and his friends can continue to make a shitty database worse. I don't think they even figure on Oracle's radar any more.
Au contraire: all of the companies are post-IPO so the VCs have already trousered enormous profits, even on Square which didn't quite make its 4 bn valuation on IPO.
As long as these companies can stop themselves from becoming penny stocks then they should be okay. The companies who really need to worry are those who are looking for more funding or were planning to IPO any time soon.
But the VCs have learned from 2000 and very few of them will feel any pain. If <insert-dorky-name-of-dodgy-service-here/> doesn't look like it's going to make much on IPO then it will either be sold to a) the competition; b) a tech behemoth still looking for a digital strategy like Microsoft, for example c) a clueless pension fund (and, trust me, there are enough of those around). The only ones who need to worry are employees who took stock options instead of pay. The VCs will be laughing all the way to their Porsche dealers!
Microsoft hasn’t exactly helped by giving Windows 10 away for free to download
We keep reading this without any numbers to back it up, Windows 10 is free because Microsoft is desperate to be able to drop support for legacy IE and the nightmares of ActiveX. It's free because Windows 8 annoyed people even more than Vista did (and that took some work) and it's free because Microsoft knows that people aren't going to buy new hardware just to run it.
Meanwhile Android and IOS continue to eat more and more of the shrinking IT budget. And Intel still isn't get much of that pie (sorry for the mixed metaphor). Hint for Intel: license ARM and release machines that will happily run x86 and ARM code in whichever way the user wants.
Yep, just been through one. It will depend upon the accounting but in some places once the hardware has been written off it costs more to keep it than replace it.
I sometimes wonder what goes on in the heads of people using VC-funded services. Where does the sense of entitlement come from?
Github is currently making a very successful land grab (and gathering lots of valuable personal data at the same time). It will continue to do so as long as there is no real pushback with people prepared to switch to alternative vendors. It's not as if they're aren't alternatives.
Where's the icon for dodgy puns? Normally I'd want to put you on the naughty step for the but in this case…
That's certainly how I read this. Windows 10 was supposed to boost PC sales. But we all know how well that has worked.
So maybe introducing hardware incompatibilities is a way of helping both MS and the makers? Can't see enterprise customers being terribly keen on this and home users are switching in droves to cheap but perfectly functional tablets.
I wonder whether we'll start to see companies moving to Citrix on Android for legacy stuff? Again, MS is shooting itself in the foot by not making the Edge browser available for Windows 7 and 8. Windows 11 is pretty good but, with development now frozen, companies have even more reasons to install a second browser such as Firefox ESR.
Most of their innovation is in the way they deal with regulation, rather than technology advances.Uber can only be successful in places where regulation is failing. The reason for taxis and private hire vehicles being regulated separately in the UK is historical and no longer really relevant. There's no such distinction here in Germany and the taxi companies already have their own app: MyTaxi. As a result Uber isn't really interesting to passengers.
Using geolocation to improve efficiency and registration to facilitate payment is a win-win for passenger and driver.
What IoT systems do you know have passwords longer than 8 characters? ;-)
Milk the data centre market for all its worth until the IoT market somehow develops just as Intel needs it? Even for Gartner that's a bit simplistic.
Sure the data centre market has higher margins but is it going to continue the way it has for the next five years? Will there really be no serious competition?
"Next year will be the year of ARM servers" may have been the call for a while now but the 64-bit chips are finally starting to appear and, even if Intel now has silicon for some of the low-grunt tasks that ARM is particularly suited to, it will still have to compete there on price. Something it doesn't have to do as much in the x86 area. Sure, recompiling for ARM does add a bit of a hurdle for some systems but, outside the GUI world, there is little software that can't be compiled on ARM.
As for IoT, well ARM is already pretty well-established in many manufacturers so Intel has a lot of work to convince people that it's worth paying more for their silicon. OTOH there might be more value in providing a reliable eco-system for developers.
Isn't this something the EU have said they want to stop though, so people don't have to put up with Geo-blocking?
Yes, but that will be for the EU only.
Netflix is being pushed to this by the rights holders. It just has to come up with something that looks to be doing a good enough job. But to be honest trying to play whack-a-mole with commercial VPN proxy services, who have a financial incentive to stay one step ahead, looks pretty unwinnable. Digital content is eminently fungible and the internet has been well designed to work around blocks. At some point this is going to put an end to exclusive licences.
However, my biggest gripe with all the new streaming services is: why do I have to register to be able to see the catalogue?
Works for me. I'm happy to fly in a plane completely controlled by the computer. Or even the dog!
The Reg imagines a great many open source enthusiasts would balk at the idea of contributing code that might end up in Windows, no matter Microsoft's radical attitude adjustment in recent years.
Which just goes to show how little you know.
Open source is about peer-review and thus, at least ideally, a two-way street. MS is making the source available – you can use it in your own projects if you so wish – very much in this spirit. I suspect that this will be welcomed by many in the .NET arena. But less so outside of it.
As soon as open source (any encumbrance on the licence) becomes about politics then it's no longer about the code.
It was never borrowed: it was used as intended.
Yep, SCSI drives were built to much higher standards than consumer IDE drives.
As for running 20 years without stopping. Well, that does sound like par for the course for FreeBSD: devil icon because there's no daemon!
I'm sorry, but no CPU on the planet works internally with abstract objects, methods, or any other cobblers you want to invent. All OO did was to help revive the textbook printing industry, since everything you needed to know about procedural programming had already been written by the end of the 1980s.
So we should convert our abstractions of the world into machine code?
First of all there is no dichotomy between OO and procedural programming. OO is merely a different way to express the procedures. Functional programming shouldn't be excluded either. It's just another tool in the box.
Secondly, what's wrong with letting a compiler convert whatever high-level code into machine code? For a while now it's been known that compilers can produce better machine code than people can. They can also do it a lot faster, too. And CPU cycles are cheaper than people, too.
Sure, there are situations, especially where memory is extremely limited where you need to program as close to the machine as possible. But you know what's even better than writing machine code? Creating hardware that's optimised for your code. All hail FPGAs and hardware acceleration.
Neither Gartner nor IDC could tablets as PCs. But let's have some fun and see what would happen if they did.
No, let's not. How about fixing up the data table instead? And while you're at it: create some nice table styling for El Reg.
It's unusual for me to agree with Gartner and IDC but I do on this. While tablets are increasingly replacing PCs and notebooks for web/e-mail/video it's still a separate market. Apple's still making a lot of money from it but not as much as it might: for the majority a 10" for £200 is more than enough. And I'm also seeing a dramatic fall in IPad web traffic from 2014 to 2015.
1000 users? Worse than useless. Not sure why you even bothered quoting the source. Haven't you got your own? What are the numbers for your own visitors? Or, visiting US government websites? Or from Akamai's data?
I suspect you'll find that some out-of-support software is more verboten than other… Then again larger companies that know they have a problem that can't be solved with IE 11 enterprise mode are probably more than willing to pony up for extra support as it's probably a lot cheaper than getting the stuff rewritten.
And for how many years have you known about that situation and done nothing to mitigate it?
No reason to be smug. Yes, there are loads of "legacy" apps essentially written for Active X that should never have seen the light of day. While you might find sys admins on this list who have to manage such systems, you're unlikely to find the golf-playing fuckwits who took the decision to buy or commission such sites so many years ago. Most also didn't come with the source code so reimplementing them is more or less impossible. And actually running them in a special VM is probably the best solution until alternatives come around.
But there are also more legitimate cases. For example, US export restrictions on encryption meant that many countries (including US allies like South Korea) couldn't get a browser with more than 128-bit encryption without using a browser plugin. The American government actively restricting strong encryption. Now, who'd have thunk it?
At the time of launch Internet Explorer 6's interpretation of the box model did comply with the standard. It's just that the standard was subsequently changed. IE 6 also gave the world the XMLHttpResponse hook that we all now use to update pages without a complete refresh.
No, Microsoft's biggest mistake was in tying IE into the OS. This meant that what should have been fairly simple browser updates became OS updates. Hence, the oddity of IE 9 being kept around for Vista even thought its immediate successor, IE 10, is for the chop.
What does this article and the related the report have to do with the EU?
Repeated studies have shown that alcohol in moderation prolongs life: it reduces the risk of heart disease and strokes. In fact the benefits of alcohol in preventing strokes and heart disease are far clearer than the negatives of drinking.
See the film "Sleeper" talking about smoking and eating hamburgers.
I have a lot of time for Sally Hawkins and would side with her on the statement: "there is no safe level". But I think you can do this without being puritanical. Alcohol has strong physiological effects on pretty much all of our major systems and is known to be addictive and mood-changing: some of the worst damage is caused indirectly through injuries and alcohol-fuelled violence.
I also can't recall any studies that suggested that the chemical alcohol was in any way healthy. There are various benefits attributed to some of the byproducts of some of our tipples (red wine for hearts, pseudo-oestrogen for bones, etc.) but I don't think we'll ever see dispensaries of surgical alcohol.
But banning something rarely makes it go away. Health education is the key to helping people make more informed decisions. There is much in our lifestyle that increases the risk to health but as the Dutch say "geniet, maar met mate" – "all things in moderation". I'll drink to that.
Netmarketshare had Windows 10 kicking up from 9.00 per cent in November to 9.96 per cent
If you must continue to trot out these reports then please stop trying presenting the numbers with scientific precision. Given that they are averages this is extremely misleading.
OTOH congratulations for finding another more credible source such as the stats for US government websites, though this is limited in geography.
Great comment. The article is largely FUD.
Anyway, isn't Google moving more and more away from Java to native code? It can easily afford to sit out the court case with Oracle, pay any damages in the unlikely result that is found against it, and carry on regardless. Oracle needs people wanting to work with Java more than Google needs any particular programming language.
Postgres really has been coming along the last few years (i've been using it since version 7.1). I think UPSERT will really help it make new friends but some of the other tweaks may even lead to monkey dances: will the BRIN index makes Postgres suitable for time series work?
Still some things are never finished. What features are we missing from Postgres?
Personally, having recently being bitten by it, I'd love to see support for loose index scans be built into the optimiser.
I don't think that's relevant. UPSERT is great because it allows you to replace possibly multiple queries (insert of new values, update of existing ones) with corresponding correlated subqueries with a declarative one: INSERT ON CONFLICT IGNORE; or, INSERT ON CONFLICT UPDATE which will respect existing constraints. UPSERT, by definition, is irrelevant for tables without unique constraints such as primary keys.
This is much, much easier for both man and machine to understand and has added the advantage of putting giving responsibility for optimising the correlated subqueries to the query optimiser.
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2017