"Microsoft negotiated a volume discount.."
There's the problem - the gubbinment should have been negotiating...
1754 posts • joined 19 May 2008
"Microsoft negotiated a volume discount.."
There's the problem - the gubbinment should have been negotiating...
Is it just me that doesn't think that this is a complex scenario?
I could design a ballot paper that would be human readable, and therefore easily verifiable, as well as machine readable, and therefore able to be loaded to the dB quickly.
It's not a complex problem to solve - although I'm not quite sure I understand the concept of using a lower choice vote for people who have voted for an already "Quota'd" candidate... Whose votes do you use - or do you use them all pro rated to the "excess votes" of the primary candidate.
So if I vote for someone popular I get 1 and a bit votes?
"Microsoft Surface beating Apple iPad ? More units sold? What?
It never happened. Just never."
Two reasons it could have happenned:
- They chose the release month of the shiny shiny from MS, which is a a mid-cycle month for Apple.
So there is an "early adopter" bump in the MS figures and a normal replacement month for Apple.
- The normal replacement cycle for Apple devices is somewhat longer than for MS (no evidence presented or needed for this theory).
Then that's the first custom version - 5k of these with a small on board storage module - maybe accessed by some magic (jumper shorting) of the input power cable...
Given that this is clearly a bulk application - Monitors/keyboards with USB hubs used to be common place, I'm sure that 5k of them with a WiFi dongle, or preferably an ethernet port, wouldn't be prohibitively expensive - a Pi Zero (2) (yes I know) would be a great little central piece...
Keyboard with a few ports on the back:
- USB power in
- HDMI out
- USB out marked "Mouse"
- Spare USB out
- Ethernet port
"That depends if the design of the vehicle / controls contributed to the accident doesn't it? If you couldn't see the dog because the driver's position had poor visibility, or because the brakes took too long to respond then yes Ford would have some blame to share for the accident"
No - they wouldn't
Both of those things should be in the experience of the driver - and they should be accomodating them.
"Perhaps you meant "VMS and BSD", but that does undermine your argument a little. There hasn't been any DOS in Microsoft's OS products since Windows XP came out, whenever that was (I was still Mac-only in those days). The NT kernel was modelled on VMS.
I use both OSes daily. There really is no difference in privilege escalation between OSX and Windows. Processes simply cannot get above their station anymore on either OS, and must ask the user for the permissions they seek."
Yes - but I couldn't remember VMS offhand, and DOS was a more polarised difference...
Priviledge escalation is possible on any OS:
Just the top links from a google search of priv esc against the register domain for the mostly discussed OSes (yes I know netBSD != FreeBSD, I only searched BSD)
Of course it is far easier to ask for the rights from the user - who usually doesn't understand what's hapening and has been trained to "click yes if you want the computer to work"
Or it might be due to the fundamentally different starting points of DOS and BSD
"Question: How do you KNOW you're close to the physical capabilities of your car at that given moment?"
Because I've done various amounts of driver training, including skid pan sessions. I also have eyes and ears, and choose to drive *well within* the capability of the car and road in front of me, it's not a race.
"I'd rather arrive 5 minutes late in this world than 50 years early in the next..."
Most mechanical devices will give you feedback as you approach the limit - for instance tyres start squirming (and the traction available actually increases up to a certain slip angle).
"Every car that passed it altered the conditions of the road by driving through it."
Yes - but not to the extent of making a dry road wet.
If you are driving *that* close to the edge of the physical capabilities of your car then get the hell off the road and onto a track where 'getting it wrong' doesn't have the potential to kill bystanders (yes marshals occasionally get killed, but they're made aware of that risk when they sign up)
As opposed to being due to drivers not driving to the conditions in front of them...
Wet roads don't cause crashes - they are the same for everyone, and all the cars in front of you managed to get past it...
I can understand why they'd like the higher royalty rate.. but is that for a song, or for an entire catalogue of 40 years of music.
The point being that you can reasonably expect that to be a continuous stream of income, generally increasing as your catalogue grows? And there is no further cost - yes I do get the cost of getting to that stage needs to be recouped, but...
I'll also suggest that it isn't the artists sole revenue stream. It's not as if the CD sales are zero since spotify, or the concerts have noone at them...
I doubt that the VoLTE requirement was put in for Airwave's benefit. The emergency services customers rely on various features of TETRA that are not available on LTE - that is a serious risk, not just a procedural change.
These are not mobile phones, they are not used for pure point to point conversations - and the timing requirements for TETRA are quite tight - you don't press a button and wait ten seconds before you can start a conversation.
That sort of thing can be really important if you are under attack, or in a burning building, so it isn't "most of the time", it's "all the time".
Similarly a call for help will be heard by many local officers as well as the control room - allowing someone who is just around the corner to respond without delay.
Because the 80% coverage that all the networks claim to have is the same 80% as each other - possibly there are few little areas of difference, but it won't get above 85%, even if you merge them all..
Nearly - but if I had a zero day on XP embedded in my pocket now I woulnd't use it for a couple of weeks.
Then I know that if it still works it will always work. AND I can also check the patches issued for whatever followed WinXP Embedded to see if the flaws fixed also existed in the older OS - and again, I know they won't be patched.
The opportunities for exploit are much higher if I know that the systems will never be patched.
Bad form replying to myself - but I don't need to do anything wierd with DreamHost:
It should be really easy!
So renew it every month by cron - how hard can it be? Looks like a simple command to retreive a new cert, and then have a simple root script copy that into place and kick apache?
I haven't played with this yet - but I will do once my current change freeze is over...
I wonder if I can do wierd things with DreamHost?
"This allows Google to track, store on its servers, and data mine for non-advertising purposes, records of every internet site students visit, every search term they use, the results they click on, videos they look for and watch on YouTube, and their saved passwords."
Every search term, every result and every youtube video - all of those are under Google's control at the other end so of course they can monitor them...
Most sites nowadays are accessed through a search, so every site is only a small extension of that...
Saved passwords - shock horror, not quite sure that they have the time or inclination to find an individual 7 years old's password to an educational games site....
Yes - the settings should be off by default, or at least be presented on a first boot/account creation basis...
And presumably it's not a UK only valuation...
But the tax system is, in general, a complete shambles
And any speeding tickets you get in Germany can be handed back to the government to pay...
Shame you can't pass them back to the car manufacturer, but the government will have to do...
"As I understand from the very broad definition, If you're getting paid, it's an enterprise. If you're not getting paid, it's a car share."
I don't think it unreasonable to expect some remuneration towards petrol & wear and tear (as defined by your government's own tax office).
Car sharing without is fine if you drive half the time, and I drive the other half, but if you always do the driving then I'm not contributing appropriately to the arrangement - paying 50% of the relevant milage rate seems fair to me - and probably good for you as well.
Carry two people to work (which I could easily have done at a previous job and you can either cut the costs in 3, or maybe everyone you carry is happy to put in 50% - in which case your own commute is free.
"If the goal is to help cover your commuting cost then my instinct would be that such an arrangement would not qualify, so long as the trip would have been made regardless of any paying passenger."
That was the case I was putting forward. But I can't quite work out how you would decide where that case stops...
Presumably where your petrol & wear costs are more than covered?
Interesting - but is a driver who, for instance, accepts a fare each way on their regular commute acting as an enterprise?
I'm not entirely convinced that they are - it's just a dynamic, and large, car pooling service.
Obviously if you are just driving around all day grabbing fares then you are operating as an enterprise...
How far out of your way do you have to go to become a taxi rather than a car share?
Maybe because they shouldn't have been reading it without a warrant.
And those warrants are so hard to get, you need to convince a judge and everything...
The VCR legality case, where significant non infringing rights were established, seem s applicable here. There are significant non infringing uses for cryptographics. Therefore they should remain legal, despite the potential for 'missing' a terrorist you knew about anyway...
"American senator Dianne Feinstein, who chairs the US Senate Intelligence Committee, told MSNBC: "If you create a product that allows evil monsters to communicate in this way, to behead children, to strike innocents – whether it's at a game in a stadium, in a small restaurant in Paris, take down an airline – that is a big problem.”"
How did they get to those places - by road. What did the Romans ever do for us?
Can your eyeballs penetrate fog? Not really.
Why assume that this is the only system available - advantage of sensor arrays is that you can easily design a few of them - 79GHz, and optical, and IR, and???
Some might not work very well in fog, but between them they will easily exceed the capacity of the plasmic scanner available to the current control system...
- Is that, typically once a quarter, really so insufferable?
Once a quarter? Try every 30 days (i.e. not quite aligned to months)
Particularly when you normally work remotely (at a client site) and therefore don't get any warnings of password expiry...
PhotoDNA - I hope it's somewhat better...
"Without valid reason..."
So you are suggesting that conforming to the Californian regulations for their vehicle (which was in California at the time) wouldn't be a valid defense if for some odd reason they chose to prosecute a purely Californian case in Germany???
That's why there is LAV (Look Aside Validation) - so you can have alternative checks of the key's validity.
It's a bit like saying that IPv6 hasn't been fully deployed so we shouldn't bother
No - and it doesn't make you coffee either...
It alows you to verify that the record you just got back from your query to theregister.co.uk was indeed signed by The Register, as authenticated by ".co" as authenticated by ".uk" as authenticated by the root.
Given that you visit frequently you can also use a preload or triangulationto further verify that the cert chain hasn't been tampered with.
You could of course add DNSCurve to secure the request/response to/from the DNS server you spoke to, but they probably keep logs anyway.
There is no reason DNSSEC cannot be used with DNSCurve - and you can add preloads and triangulation, amongst other things to provide further verification [more importantly to increase the cost of an attack, since that is all we can ever really do]
When diud you last clear out the 600+ certificate authorities in your browser?
DNSSEC does provide a decent chain of trust though - you can see who you are trusting in the URL, no need to check that the cert isn't issued by a dodgy elbonian authority.
It could also allow a sideband transfer of HTTPS certs, allowing those certificate chains to be combined into one, easily visible chain of trust.
an iPad - add mouse support and they are great little devices.
I access a full fat Linux desktop running in a virtual frame buffer usinf X11VNC over a VPN tunnel.
The fact that it happens to be on a VPS in some far off datacentre doesn't ever seem to cause an issue. Of course I'm not doing anything too challenging on it...
When I contracted for the NHS they had CAROL (Computer Access Regardless Of Location) and it was nice to disconnect in one office, drive home, then 6 hours in the other direction and sit down at a random desk to the same desktop, with the applications still running....
I did manage to kill it once (I went to IT and suggested that I might, and could I have a test server - It'll be fine they said. When 20% of the office got simultaneously disconnected they gave me a test server)
...that she could have asked what colour the light was?
I'd have suggested she grab someone off the street to check the colour. I am presuming that this is before the days of camera phones, where a simple picture message of the light would have done the job...
Alot of salaries on a destroyer..
Random destropyer picked on wikipedia - 35 officers, 218 men.
And that ignores any consumables...
Apparently three people disagree and think that collisions are better at higher speeds. I just hope they don't get trusted with a couple of tons of metal with a significant power plant in it on a regular basis.
Speed is however a massive factor.
It increases the energy involved in any collision. Since the energy is proportional to the square of the speed even relatively small speed increase makes a significant increase in the energy brought to the scene.
It decreases the time available to react to any situation - whether that be a mechanical failure or a human failure on your own or someone else's part. It also increases the distance required for that reaction to occur - compounding the difficulty.
Obvioulsy travelling at 30mph (relative to what?) doesn't kill, but the energy which does kill people is readily available at speed, and judging by the number of road deaths each year is beyond the capacity of many people to reliably control...
Take GoSafe who run the speed cameras in North Wales and areas of England, all material they produce states "we don't hide cameras", "speed kills"; both claims have been proven to be untrue or cannot be proven
Find me an accident that would have killed someone if noone had had any speed - speed kills... Obvious innit.
(Yes, I know it's the sudden stop - or the sudden start in the even that you hit someone else, which is more likely at high speed than low)
230MW isn't much compared with the grid overall, but it is still 230MW which we don't need to be supplying...
I might have to get myself a natural gas powered generator for blackouts...
"But can you see both meters from the kitchen and do they give readings using your current tariff in pounds and pence?"
No - but that doesn't stop me turning off the lights, and leaving various items on standby - because I'm happy to burn a few watts continuously in the name of convenience.
A few watts will take hundreds of hours to become a kWH, at which point it costs me somewhere in the region of 10p, depending on the time of day. I don't need to consult a screen constantly, because I've done the sums and am happy with them....
I'll guarantee one thing - the new meters will take more power than the old ones did.
Whilst *I* might not care too much about 1Watt over a few million installations that adds up and that's several MW the grid now has to find.
I have stuff running on mains - you can switch my meter live if you must switch it at all...
I don't need a new meter to tell me that I am using electricity - or how much.
The current one already does that. No supplier has read it in years because I supply readings periodically.
Where we're going, we don't need a letterbox...
Just drive through the wall...
Assuming HTTPS - then yes. But since they can just issue a warrant for those logs anyway (assuming a UK server)
My only point was that NAT isn't a perfect anonymisation tool as implied in the article. There is alot of information leakage...
And which machine is in use behind NAT can be inferred from UA headers etc. Which can easily be enough to ID a user...
That looks like a sum, so I get $900 for getting one of these?
I might even be tempted at that price
Yes - because obviously we camn't vent the oxygen into the atmosphere.
Apollo 1 had a high pressure pure oxygen atmosphere - not quite comparable...
I sometimes carry a pair of laptops, pair of phones and my tablet between home and work - I consider that to be massively excessive, but it's useful occasionally
Carried cable count: 0
I have a docking station and charger for the laptops at work, and a pair of chargers at home.
The phones both take MicroUSB, one lasts 10 days, the other 2 - so they very rarely need charging at the same time, but there is a cable on my desk and by the sofa.
The tablet takes a proprietary connection - and there is a cable for it at work and at home.
When I go on holiday I'll normally take a USB charger and one of each cable type... Maybe take two (one for me, one for the wife)
I drive a recumbent most of the time, and a flag or mast makes neglibible difference to visibility to motorists.
I dont' see many flags/masts here: Google images
I've been commuting by 'bent for 7 years now, and my worst incident occured when I had colourful 2" wide 6' long kite streamers on a fishing whip and an 18" england flag at the driver's eye level as well as being lit up like a proverbial christmas tree. The driver looked straight at me and failed to see me...
The issue is that motorists look for cars, not clear tarmac. That's why there are so many "SMIDSY" incidents with motorbikes, cyclists and pedestrians. If you claim you can't see this box-on-wheels then how do you avoid concrete blocks in the road?
How do you avoid dogs?
How do you avoid children?
Besides which this thing would only occasionally be crossing a road, so most of the time it should be safe from motorists, except that they can't seem to keep between the kerbs - motorists in the UK kill 40-60 people a year on pavements (this even excludes crossings where the pedestrian has priority)
Yeah - because motorists can't see the white lines on the road, or the cats eyes between lanes, so how will they see anything taller than that?
@NumptyScrub - Metric, for all it's faults, is far less confusing when trying to learn the various measures; just learn the SI prefixes and you are good to go with mass, length, and volume right away ;)
Well, except for units of mass...
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2017