You can get one of the best paying jobs in the world.
That definately wouldn't be on par with what the coders in my company earn then.....
3255 posts • joined 4 May 2008
But off-shore workers produce some quirky software that didn't quite meet the specifications and asking them to make the relevant changes is like trying to skin a live whale with a plastic tortoise.
Said manager then leaves company or worse gets promoted according to the Peter Principal .
Ok, that seems a bit more logical. I initially understood it aas simply being Apple studying the habits of their customers within the premises.
>instead of wandering around for 10 minutes then giving up, wandering another few minutes finding someone who can help and finding it is one aisle over from the first place you looked.
Agreed it really is a pain in the arse in the larger stores trying to find some specific items..
I do not know about other Apple stores but in Geneva the store is a relatively small affair, it is a T shape.
As you walk in there are the usual Macbooks, or whatever is A La Mode du Jour, on either side of you as you walk in. Then you arrive in the main area which has four large table upon which are spread the usual Macbooks, Ipads etc...
On the edges there are some more shelves/tables with some Imacs and in one corner there is a stand for accessories and on the opposite end the Macbar or whatever it is called.
In all honesty, it takes about 1.2 minutes to see the whole affair and everything just seems to be repeated/spread about everywhere.
It always appears that there are more apple staff than there are customers. It's genueinly a very boring affair.
I can't even begin to imagine the point of activating such a system for such a small surface. I can only presume that the Apple shops are much larger elsewhere but I can't for the life of me imagine what they stock more than the tiny Geneva shop stocks and what could possibly justify the requirement.
El Reg is an important tech site that helps us keep track of what is "useable" and what is not.
Anything that has been released from Github, less than 1 day ago can be considered as "useable"... albeit not quite bleeding edge.
Bleeding edge would require access to the source files, the compiler and the compile button.....
Everything else is Obsolete Tech...
Anything Apple is by default obsolete unless you have direct access to Steve Jobs expired brain waves ...( the next S version or C version is never far away). Apparently Apple have patented Steves brain waves and are currently preparing to store them in a special vault within the new
anus loop building.
Even an El Reg article of less then 10 minutes old should be considered as Obsolete News...
I do not think that the comms are subsidised, what is definately true though is that competition between the operators is very dynamic and it has been for several years. The service, speed, equipment is pretty much the same for all operators, so the only difference that gives them any advantage is low prices.
The watchdog has also ensured that it is very easy to change providers and this has proved also to be an excellent opportunity for the end-customer.
Anyone in France with a television must pay a TV licence of 131 Euros per year, I dont have a TV so I do not pay it, but they are now thinking about making anyone with a computer/connection pay this licence.
20Mb ADSL line ( Orange or SFR France) ( Land line is include din ofer with free calls to most of the world.
= 32 Euros per month.
Mobile telephone ( I make very few calls -- 20 Euros per month).
I don't have a television ( everything worthwhile is available on the web - as far as I am concerned)
Total = 52 Euros for internet, Landline + Mobile.
Which is slightly better than 408$ .......
In the tube stations they could do what some of the French underground does, full length, full height plastic barriers. The barriers have doors which open only when the train is at a standstill and close before the train moves of... It avoids all of those meat-bag accidents....
Here is an example of a barriere
The stupid will eventually remove themselves and hopefully without any collateral damage..
I miss the days when social networking involved going down the pub to have a pint and simply chatting with whoever was there. Why does "social" have to involve gadgets...
I met up with my brother this weekend through a familly gathering, he is a farcebook user and he explanied to me how one of our cousins is extremely chatty with him on FB. The cousion keeps him up to date with all the family trivia etc....
Funnily enough when they met, face to face, in that same social event this weekend they didn't have a single thing to say to each other....
If it has to be tactile then shaking hands is fine, if it has to be written then handwritten letters are fine, if it has to be said then talking face to face is fine...
El Reg is the exception though as it is not really Social Networking, it's just the Reg.
So men were designed to be the hunters and women to me the mothers... I think that nature has known this for a long time already.
There is nothing intentionally derogatory about the above remark, so please abstain from the usual PC diatribe.
Of course there are exceptions, but they are after all just that, exceptions.
I learned to speak Hebrew many years ago, it was far easier than trying to understand some of these plates
I still can't see what the following are TR14 DDS, LU63 FER ( Lucifer ?)
and what's wrong with SK14 NKY ( Skanky, I presume)
And this takes a fair bit of imagination SP14 STK.....( Spastic ?)
The only one that was remotely intelligent was HU63 NOB .... As it used both of the numbers, whereas the others only used one, or required the fusion of the the two....
Someone at DVLA has a very OR16 NAL job...
Yep. there is a learning curve which I feel is necassary before heading out into the deeper waters. I mentioned hanging about for a week but usually it is much longer. Some of the XDA threads easilly run into hundreds of replies/posts amongst which you have to try and filter out the fluff and hopefully manage to find the hidden gems.
If modding was so easy and without problems then XDAs forums would be empty, but they are not....
( There might be other forums but I always stuck with XDA, there are some very talented devs over there)
I have been a follower of Cyanogen and XDA Devs for a few years, I am(was) also a programmer ( from assembler to VBA), I also have about 20 years experience in the PC/IT industry world.
I have also modded numerous phones... from CM and various other flavors.
BUT, there are times when even I am a little confused about what to do when things go wrong.... OK I know how to use forums and ask questions but it can sometime take a while to know who to trust. There are a lot of newbies on the forums with a lot of "newbie" advice..... dangerous.... I usually hang about the forums for a week or so before beginning any knew modding in order to pick up on whats good, bad and ugly.
I am not sure why but I get the feeling that releasing this kind of tool to the general public ( there are a lot of numpties out there) is not such a great idea. As long as everything goes OK, why not, but when the shit hits the fan, and it will, there will be several very angry people thinking these b****rds have ruined my phone. ( yes they will be wrong but they don't know that).
Most of the mods are non-destructive but that won't stop a lot of people panicking and no-one will be around to help them...
I am not ranting or complaining about CM or modding in general, I've used/followed them far too long for that, I am just imagining the scenarios that will undoubetdly unfold.
If there are no NSA, Google, UserData being sent to third parties hidden procedures then I want one.
If it is a good phone, can do maps and the web then that's enough for me. Looking forward to seeing the evolution, thumbs up for the guys taking on this venture. I wish them success.
How about the Americans stop snooping in the first place... there solved.
When you have muppets like Cameron et al that are happy to share our data with the Yanks then there is no point in suing anyone. The yank lawyer would just turn round and say that they had permission form GCHQ or other European agency anyway.......
Sounds more like a lawyers wet dream than anyhing even remotely serious.
I can't believe it, after all that El Reg fires out this article Schmidt: Social networking will FREE THE PEOPLE of China.
Maybe I wasn't too far from the truth after all.....
This is where Google is going too far, they are now actively playing the altruistic political rhetoric card.
>“They have sometimes made Google services like Gmail excruciatingly difficult to use,” he wrote. “But given how essential Google’s services are to so many individuals and businesses, blocking the company entirely would have immediate and disastrous economic consequences.”
1st: Google is not essential to anyone or anything. They are a service that can be used or not.... Obligation = Zero..
2nd: Disastrous economic consequences - For whom - Google...... The money will simply be ingested by someone or some other business ( hopefully a meriting business)
3rd: If the Chinese govt decide to put up a firewall then that is a Chinese govt problem not a google problem. By making "blocked" sites available then google are effectively breaking Chinese law and should be punished accordingly. When in Rome....
Eric Schmidt has become the ultimate "CockWomble". (Whoever came up with that word deserves a pint).
Why is it that when people reach a certain level of wealth they suddenly feel the need to become saviours of humanity. Gates, Bono, Schmidt, Joly..... Smells like cheap publicity.
If they want to be altruistic, give the money and do the work anonymously.......without the publicity.....
Monday was Ok , I have Tuesday morning blues
Since when was Android free ? Next you wil be telling us that Google is also free..
Think about what you are saying first....
>I rarely downvote posts, but I made an exception for the nasty implication that the only way a woman can obtain money is by sleeping with a rich man.
There was absolutely nothing intentionally sexist in my remark and nothing was implied, that is merely your choice of interpretation. I was referring more to the fact that it is difficult to understand how anyone managed to obtain 200K for such a product without there being some form of "pot de vin".
Would you have given this woman 200K for this project based solely on the idea?
@DAM - Assure me, you're not going to invest your life saving into this little capital venture.....
I wish to here more donkeys "naysaying"....
I wish to hear the Pope, pontificating....
I wish the egosit were more altruistic.
I wish Ayn Rand wrote easier books to understand.
I wish that Segue-ing would lead me somewhere.....
I wish that ex-pats were more Nationalistic.
I wish that the anti-social become more Social.
I wish that Communism didn't mean losing my comforts.
Et voila, I could become a member of Impossible..
Supermodel - NOT. More like a red-headed version of ET.
Website Good Idea- NOT - Who did she sleep with in order to "obtain" £200 000 for that ? Can we safely presume that she is merely the name behind the project.. If so then there is the first fail, I had to look up Google to even know who she was. If they said the idea had been Jimbos then I would have simply laughed about it being a silly idea.
People sharing things for free, I doubt it. Most altruistic ideads end up dead in the water or surrounded by scam artists.
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019