Re: Never again!
You should have used the traditional leather Wellington boot.
800 posts • joined 24 Apr 2008
You should have used the traditional leather Wellington boot.
My Yorkshire rellies have it with gravy and onion sauce before the meat and veggie course, and for afters with jam or golden syrup. Possibly because it helped fill you up before the expensive meat course, and if you were still hungry afterwards.
Yesterday I couldn't spell "Engineer", now I are one.
In the 1980s I ran a DG Nova with a 5+5 removable Phoenix drive attached to a very large, expensive, scientific instrument. I got funding to replace the drive with a Winchester. The new drive was mounted in a 19" rack enclosure contained in one side of a of a knee-hole desk unit that housed the CPU etc on the other side. The drive could be slid out on rails for servicing and we all admired the platter and drive head beneath its transparent top cover. The read-write head had an electromagnet "voice coil (So called because it made a pleasant melodious sound when it operated?). The head had an aerofoil cross-section and "flew" just above the surface of the rotating disk.
I found out the reason why a common failure of a hard disk was called a "crash": I was listening to the musical hum as I ran an experiment when there was a faint bang followed by a loud scraping sound. When I turned the DG off and opened up the rack, the inside of the transparent plastic cover was coated with oxide and I could see a large spiral radial gouge mark on the platter. I called in the service engineer who told me that the repair/replacement cost was our problem as it was an "normal" event. I think the cost was about the same as my new car.
So China is now doing to the USA what the USA did to the European powers in the 19th century? Ignore foreign patents and "steal" technologies, initially to develop products for use in your large domestic market. After you overtake your competitors, then you need to protect your technology, so you become a fervent protector of "intellectual property"?
"Australia's government has fulfilled a promise to probe Web giants' impact on the media, news and advertising businesses." How dare they not cater to the needs of the Murdoch empire and the LNP. They have worked hard to put the right people at the top of the ABC, and now they need to do something with these apparently powerful upstarts.
I am genuinely in two minds about this - Google and Facebook really need looking at, but the LNP's track record on regulation of the media and the internet suggests that whatever they come up with will be worse than the current situation.
Until you steal from the rich.
Repeating the same thing and expecting a different result? Declining revenues over 22 quarters, reducing the local headcount, and revenues have not increased. Amazingly, cutting costs by offering a service that customers might consider suboptimal have not turned things around.
"Google claims the collection is part of an experiment to optimize the routing of messages through mobile networks."
Mandy Rice-Davies applies...
Because I am old, I remember what banking was like before it was improved. Bankers called it It "The three threes" - Borrow money at 3%, lend it at 3% more, and be on the golf course after 3 o'clock.
We were told that ATMs would make everything more convenient, faster, more efficient and cheaper; and our charges would come down. They lied.
We were then told that going on-line would make everything more convenient, faster, more efficient and cheaper; and our charges would come down. They lied.
Originally banking required lots of staff, paper, ledgers and competence - It worked. Then it required a few less staff, who knew how to use 3270 terminals - It still worked pretty reliably.
Now that everything is electronic, and IT is the core of the banking business, how come that all of them are unreliable and incompetent? Oh, that's right they are friends of whomsoever is in government, and are "Too big to fail".
One Rich Arsehole Called Larry Ellison - Allegedly.
I should have mentioned that where I live, sandals, a polo shirt (without pockets), and shorts are normal attire. Sitting down with a large phone in the pocket of my shorts is not something I want to do.
As an "older user" with presbyopia, I am now finding my 6 too small. A phone big enough to see is probably the 8 Plus, but then I can't fit it in my pocket. The X might do, but £1,000 for a phone? I am debating an SE and trying not to use it to look at websites. The keyboard will be too small for older fingers, and speaking softly to Siri does not seem to work too well either.
Maybe get a better case for my iPad and use that with a VOIP and mobile client? Anybody know anything better than Skype that might do?
Don't try any of this unless
you're signed up for Software Assurance it is with test/redundant stuff! ®
"if you're so clever, you tell us what colour it should be."
Have an upvote, and a beer >>===============>
On the LP introduction according to Flanders, Swann thought the song was about cake, and so it was...
Will Groklaw come back to life as well?
I believe that PJ stopped active contributor involvement when she learn (through the owner of Lavabit) about the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court/FBI/NSA/DOJ/TLA letters giving the government unlimited authority to obtain data, and making it illegal to disclose the existence of the letter: Groklaw forced exposure link.
I'm a pensioner with sub-standard eyesight, and an iPhone 6. I just held my phone at the distance from my face that I use for Touch ID and then to read the phone; the first distance is roughly 25" and the second is about 15". I can't read the screen in bright sunlight, and feel like a prat using Siri outside, so Facial ID would probably work OK for me. The main problem that I can see is that I am unlikely to spend £1,000 on the new phone when I would expect my 6 to last another 2 years.
According to Apple, Face ID is designed not to work unless the phone is roughly in front of you and your eyes are open, so if you are nicked, try to keep your eyes closed if the officer starts waving it in front of you.
So does this allow Google to determine the location of your phone accurately enough to determine which part of a shop window you have paused in front of, and then try to sell you stuff based on what you might have been looking at?
The problem is that their primary purpose is not as a weapon system. Their purpose is to take large amounts of tax payers money and make certain that most of it is directed to a very small number of the right people. In the UK the right people are not only British but American/Multinational.
After the apparent fall of the "Soviet Empire", it was necessary to quickly find a suitable enemy to keep the spending going - The "War on Terror" is ideal because it has no easily definable enemy, no clearly stated definition of "winning", no timescale, and mostly happens a long way away from the people who actually pay for it. Perhaps we will get back to business as normal with Russia and China (and North Korea?). Projects like the F-35, nuclear powered submarines, large aircraft carriers, etc., are ideal ways to soak up taxpayers money.
Older readers may recall a vaguely similar, but smaller, cancelled project the BAC TSR-2. It was rumoured that the mean time to failure for the aircraft was shorter than the time it took to get to V1 takeoff speed down the runway...
It seems unlikely that the existing content oligarchs would allow a single aggregator to offer a universal service without a disruptive change in the market. Apple nearly managed it with music (£10/month for 40 million songs) - Could someone do something similar for TV and Movies without intrusive advertising?
"The very best thing about this news is that evidence-based policy is now officially a thing of the past."
Evidence-based policy is certainly a thing of the present: "Here is my policy, now find evidence to support it - If you find evidence that does not support my policy, do not report it."
The old style mini had a built in CD/DVD and made a brilliant, nearly silent media player. The $20 server add-on was/is an opportunity to install a workgroup/small business server that has a similar function to the old Microsoft Small Business Server line. The Server's Profile Manager is a useful tool to manage iOS devices - Joshua Jung (Medium Link) has a tutorial, and MacStadium (now merged with Macminicolo) host minis and may be worth a look.
Esteemed Poster» As a septic...
Sceptic  maybe?
 or skeptic if you are of the Leftpondian persuasion.
Septic Tank - Yank. In Oz a Seppo.
So Mr Helme likes Google Analytics for this. Can I suggest a compromise that he could suggest to uBlock - Allow anything that goes to his own domain (and possibly Mozilla) and block Google and everything else?
"Subaru are nice cars, but hardly on the hotlist of most stolen cars
"Jack the Lad" likes older Impreza WRX/STI to joyride with his mates.
Pedant again - As usual, the 'truth' can appear ambiguous. The TURBOProp is a "jet powered" propeller (Mostly 80-95% of thrust from the propeller, with the remainder from the jet exhaust). Early Turbofans generally had perhaps <20% of thrust from the "fan" the rest came from the "jet" - For many modern commercial engines the thrust from the fan is ~90% (or at a similar level to a turboprop). A single fan can be considered to be a multi-bladed ducted propeller - Efficient modern engines use 2 or 3 fan stages. High speed turbojets ("jet engines") typically generate most/all of their thrust from the "jet"; but may be designed to vary the amount of thrust between the turbojet and a bypass turbofan, particularly at lower speed. The term "ducted propeller" is often used for marine thrusters and engines, and "ducted fan" tends to be used for aircraft. The reason that turboprops appear very different is that you can see a large stationary propeller; and that if the blades are rotating, pedestrians need to avoid walking into them :-) Wikipedia Link: Aircraft fans.
"a plane operated by Skyjet Aviation, a charter outfit that despite its name operates only turboprop aircraft".
I don't know if any domestic airlines use jet aircraft. Turbofans power most medium/long range passenger aircraft, turboprops are often used for smaller short/medium range aircraft. Turbojets are normally for faster military aircraft, I think the last passenger aircraft to use turbojet engines was Concorde.
I worked with the Oracle platform from V5. A question from back then:- What do you call Oracle customers? A: Hostages.
Haven't seen anything of theirs for years, thanks to Ad-Blockers.
Are you sure it can't spread contagion by proximity? >>=========>
"I've seen things you people wouldn't believe."
What about the "Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion."
"Kangaroos are generally smart enough to avoid the trains"
By the number I see dead on the side of the road around here they don't seem to be smart enough to avoid road traffic. I have seen one grazing at the side of the road and then, just as I was within a few metres, it moved across the road in front of me. ABS brakes and luck helped avoid a collision.
The Docklands Light Railway was envisaged as fully automated. The unions were not happy, and so initially they had a driver who did other stuff as well, this job was turned into a "Passenger Service Agent" who acts a bit like a conductor or guard, and checks whether people are stuck in doors etc., this person can manually bring the vehicle to a stop, and "drive" it. Passengers really wanted to see a human "in charge", perhaps we are now close to the customer accepting no visible human operator.
I know someone who worked on automating trains at a large competitor. He believed that it was a test of concept, but with a fairly fast financial return - A train driver costs roughly $250,000 in the Pilbara or Gascoyne, so 20 drivers @ $5 million a year starts to look like real money. Many other jobs in mining are being replaced, full automation is probably coming for the Komatsu 250+ ton Dump Trucks.
A popular Victorian circus/show attraction was the Pig-Faced Lady, reputedly an interbred aristocratic woman. They really were shaved bears. Warning - To avoid possible embarrassment: Do not try an image search for "shaved bear".
I've withdrawn my post - Autocorrect, and I hadn't had my coffee...
I looked at this technology when it was expected to run on an IBM XP. It had some functionality and could make limited predictions for what we we looking at, which was predicting equipment failures by analyzing used lubrication oils. We were surprised that the spruikers of the technology were using medicine as their showcases, as we thought it likely that medicos would not want to give up their expertese - Apparently the technology would be viable because they had some data suggesting that many people preferred giving yes/no responses to a computer than consulting their GP for embarrassing or serious conditions.
It has nothing to do with firing 20% of the staff and inadequate management; and poor staff morale then?
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2017