* Posts by bazza

1926 posts • joined 23 Apr 2008

Linux kernel dev who asked Linus Torvalds to stop verbal abuse quits over verbal abuse

bazza
Silver badge

Re: The problem is, usually Linus is right

"With all due respect, "her responsibility" which is USB 3.0 continues to be fickle and quirky in Linux till today. She has allowed crap code to go in multiple times as a maintainer and is complaining that she gets flak. So while Linus is sometimes overdoing it, she is being disingenuous at best."

Right, where to start?

First, it was not "her responsibility", she is a volunteer. No one obliged her or paid her to do that work. Without her efforts you would not now have USB 3 in the kernel at all, you ungrateful prick. If it's too flaky for your tastes, you fix it. Can you do that? Thought not.

Second, are you saying that personal insults amount to valid technical criticism? In that case, here's some valid technical criticism for you: you're a fuckwit.

Third, if Linus was not happy from a technical point of view with her contributions, why would he have admitted it to the kernel? If he was unhappy he could have organised help or helped out himself maybe (afterall, Linus understands that volunteers have limited time available, that they've got lives outside of Linux, that no one actually wants to submit duff code, and that shouting at a volunteer does not magically give them 36 hours in the day. He knows that that extra effort helps fix duff code, it won't magically fix itself if one single volunteer hasn't got the resources to do the job). Or he could have excluded her code entirely from the kernel (i.e. "sacked" her) and made other arrangements for USB 3 support in Linux. He seemingly did none of these things. We can therefore conclude that from a technical point of view Linus was, overall, content with how things were.

Perhaps you should complain about flaky code to Linus, see where that gets you?

She's left, and given the reputation of the Linux community I can't say that I blame her at all. I'll thank her for her contribution, even if you won't.

Thank you for your contribution, Sarah Sharp.

Can you say that yourself? Go on, it doesn't hurt a bit.

The community now needs to find someone willing to pick up the poisoned chalice and run with it. An atmosphere of personal abuse is no way to incentivise someone to do work, especially when a) no one is paying them, b) there is life outside the Linux kernel community, and c) they have limited time to give (all volunteers have limited resources, lives to earn and run, etc. There's not a lot to encourage anyone else to take up USB 3 in Linux. Frankly, with Linus at the top of the pile, picking up "responsibility" for any kernel module seems to promise little in the way of glowing praise, thanks, etc, and guarantees a whole lot of unpleasantness. Who'd want that?

Perhaps another conclusion to be drawn from the presence of Sharp's USB 3 code in Linux is that Linus couldn't find anyone else willing to do it, and may now struggle to secure the unpaid, unloved labour of another volunteer. That might be the sad inevitability of this situation.

101
18

Ten years on: Ronnie Barker, Pismonouncers Unanimous founder, remembered

bazza
Silver badge

Re: Ronnie Barker

It's regularly on Radio 4 Extra, and I've a dab radio in the car, so I listen to it a lot!

1
0
bazza
Silver badge

Ronnie Barker

Top chap.

Best seaman in the navy too :)

3
0

Apple in eyebrow-raising threesome with TSMC, Samsung for iPhone 6S

bazza
Silver badge

Re: The title is no longer required.

Apple have niche marketshare (~12% and dropping), they aren't attracting new users, if anything losing users.

Irrelevant, commercially speaking. If they're still increasing profits, that is how they will be judged by those who really matter; the shareholders.

The fashion victims that own iPhones are just upgrading to newer more expensive contracts.

Well, how about that?!

Like them (I don't) or loathe them (hmmm, maybe), their commercial success is undeniable. If they can continue to make profits like this despite falling market share that's potentially a gold mine in it's own right; one could conclude that they're narrowing their user base to the ultra-premium market, where price is increasingly not an issue.

That's what every company wants, a customer base addicted to your product with no financial or other motivation whatsoever to buy a competing product. They can charge what they like then, so long as they keep churning out something basically the same as before but "better" (even if it's not really).

Arguably they've been there for quite a while now...

BA did the same with Concorde ticket prices. When they realised that none of their passengers actually knew what the flight was costing them, they put the price up by, what, 500%? Made no difference to their passenger numbers, but made a big difference to their profits.

The Android market is different. That's involved in a race to the bottom. There be dragons down in those depths...

3
0

Audi, Seat, Skoda admit they've been fiddling car pollution tests as well

bazza
Silver badge

"Or certainly more like their competitors explaining why VW's diesel magic was too good to be true."

VW's magic was to "pass" certification whilst omitting a urea injection system. I don't think that necessarily turned into VWs being cheaper than the competition, they just made more profit from it.

If by "magic" you mean high performance whilst being clean, then seemingly others have managed it. The researchers who spilt the beans on VW specifically cited a BMW X5 (I think it was one of those) as being Okay. One should hope so - BMW put on a urea injection system, and use 2 or 3 turbos to extract the maximum performance from a smallest amount of fuel. With all that lot it jolly well ought to be clean.

However, that's a lot of very expensive kit strapped to the side of the engine block, and doesn't really come in at a price point compatible with low end market pricing. That suits BMW just fine, but it's not affordable for the lower end manufacturers.

I suspect the result of all this will be an increase in the cost of manufacturing a diesel engine for the low end of the market, which will effectively dump them out of the market altogether. Petrol / petrol hybrid will likely end up being cheaper.

Even (or as some might say, especially) BMW get things hopelessly wrong sometimes. On at least one of their twin turbo diesels there is a linkage between an actuator and the turbo's vanes, and the metal (or plastic, I forget which) they used for this part has the consistency and resilience of cheese. It wears very quickly, consequently the turbo vanes are not set right, and there's all sorts of running and emissions problems as a result. There's a good trade for independent BMW specialists in replacing these simple linkages with proper ones made out of proper metal.

8
0
bazza
Silver badge

"Skoda, the low-end Czech car manufacturer"

Oh boy, are you out of date or what?

13
1

Feds want a phone smart enough to burn itself if it falls into the wrong hands

bazza
Silver badge

They're making a big mistake...

This has conflicting requirements.

1) Detect that the right person is carrying the phone, with 100% reliability.

2) Detect when the wrong person carrying the phone, with 100% reliability.

It's no good if it's, say, 99% reliable. That would mean that it would occassioanlly self destruct on a legitimate user, and sometimes fail to destroy itself in the hands of an unauthorised user.

With any kind of feature, gait, biometric sensor there is a degree of uncertainty as to what they've measured. It can never be 100%. Even us humans sometimes get it wrong (ever been convinced you've seen a friend out and about who turned out not to be? Embarassing when you walk up to them and say "Hi!").

The maths involved in optimising weights for combining unreliable sensors like this are clear. You can bias the system one way or the other, but not in both directions at once.

In short, it won't work well enough to actually be useful. Biased one way it will be too unreliable for legitimate users. Biased the other and it will not be secure enough for the intended purpose.

Incidentally the maths problems underpinning the problems with these sorts of systems and requirements is what killed off the biometric identity card scheme here in the UK. They (finally, and very late) realised that it would be useless at the intended purpose, which was letting UK citizens through passport control at the airport and keeping non-UK citizens out (or queuing up at passport control). It was either going to let people impersonate UK citizens too easily, or deny entry to genuine citizens too regularly.

9
0

BlackBerry's tactical capitulation to Google buys time – and possibly a future

bazza
Silver badge

BlackBerry are doing what Nokia didn't.

Nokia vanished. Maybe BlackBerry won't..

5
0
bazza
Silver badge

Re: App Availability

Me neither.

However it's clear from the market figures that that is not a selling point.

Loads of people moan about Android permissions all the time, but it's rarely enough to make them buy a BlackBerry...

The crazy thing is that if, hypothetically, someone did a properly good app for Android that gave you the same level of control as you get in BB10 it would be a knock out best seller. Ad blockers are very popular, it would be similar in essence to those. There seems to be a lot of mediocre / crap ones on the Google store... There is clearly a level of demand for it out there.

Personally I loathe Android's Freemium funding model. It's a distasteful race to the bottom that gives zero choice for those who are happy to pay a little bit of cash for stuff that works but doesn't snoop.

2
0

German regulator sets VW deadline

bazza
Silver badge

Re: Go Petrol Go!

British army fighting vehicle of old, such as the Chieftain tank, could be converted with a spanner fairly quickly.

It wasn't wholly successful. They didn't run very well on either fuel, and if run on petrol for an extended period of time the piston rings would wear quite quickly. The result was that they could start dieseling on their own lubrication oil, and run out of control and explode. Apparently running away was the recommended course of action.

2
0
bazza
Silver badge

If KBA withdraws approval for the affected cars, they can neither be sold nor driven in Germany.

Not even driven? Blimey! That will sting...

11
0

NOxious VW emissions scandal: Car maker warned of cheatware YEARS AGO – reports

bazza
Silver badge

Re: Today VW ...

Seemingly VW are fairly unique in the diesel world in not using urea in the exhaust system to reduce NOx emissions. From what I hear, urea injection definitely works, so if other manufacturers (which I gather is all of them) have used it then they should be in the clear.

The real problem they have is that these systems need to be properly looked after. They wear out, run out of urea, get fouled up. A diesel car when it's brand new is pretty clean, but after a 100,000 miles who knows? Especially if you run it on cheap diesel.

And of course, things like diesel particulate filters, catalytic converters, exhaust gas recirculation valves, etc. all cost serious money to replace, especially if you take your old car back to BMW, Mercedes, Renault or whoever. I get the distinct impression that the manufacturers push the renewal costs upwards as a ploy to get you to buy a new car. Who would spend £1000 on a car worth £1500?

So I think the real scandal is that the major atmosphere protecting components are not built to last or be econmoically replaced throughout the true lifetime of the car. There must be many a diesel that gets to 100,000 miles only to then start spitting out soot and fumes, yet no owner can reasonably justify the expense to get it fixed. So they don't, and they just drive it around anyway.

8
0

NASA rover coders at Intel's Wind River biz axed – sources

bazza
Silver badge

Re: Agism and fools

@petur,

"I'm so happy I'm done with using INTEGRITY, ran against more bugs than we wanted to handle, and the standard response was that there was a newer version just out, please try that."

Sorry to hear that. I have to say my experiences with INTEGRITY were all good. This has all been in the past 4 years, version 10. The support I got here in the UK was very good indeed. We didn't try to run on anything out of the ordinary, stuck to carefully chosen standard x86 hardware, and didn't need a magic cable either. Maybe that was a good choice. In that particular system it was very good value for money.

The drivers may be derived from BSD, but they're not really part if the OS proper. The clever bit, the kernel, is all theirs AFAIK.

It's so hard to put an off the peg OS onto bespoke hardware, Linux, VxWorks, etc they're all hard. Someone somewhere has to put the lot of effort into software support. Linux has put a lot of effort into SoC, which is a tremendous help.

0
0
bazza
Silver badge

Re: Topical

@Thames,

"Intel is rarely the first choice for CPUs these days in embedded markets..."

It depends on which particular bit of the market. I can assure you that in the high performance embedded market (radar, etc) it's Intel all the way for newish projects. That's simply because Freescale (now NXP) failed to deliver a decent PowerPC with decent math performance. Not surprisingly I suppose, the market is perhaps too small.

Once upon a time I can remember it being the other way round. I can remember 400 MHz 7410 PowerPCs being way quicker than 4 GHz Pentium 4s (mostly down to Altivec, the PowerPC equivalent of SSE). In my opinion Altivec is still better than SSE, but the first Nehalem Xeons were just monstrous enough to overwhelm anything the PowerPC world was selling, especially as IBM canned the Cell processor.

So in short, if you want a lot of embedded CPU maths the only choice left in the market is Intel.

Which also implies Linux. The Linux kernel works better on Intel's big chips (Xeons, etc) than VxWorks apparently.

Embedding Linux (with the premp-rt patches) on Xeons and making the whole thing real time is really, really difficult. It can be done however, and these days it is about the only option left if you want to crunch a lot of numbers.

Freescale did very well out of the telecommunications market with their PowerQICC range without Altivec.

2
0
bazza
Silver badge

Re: Agism and fools

And if Intel do screw the vxworks side of the business that will seriously hamper a number of really quite important projects for Uncle Sam's DoD.

When Apple took over PaSemi, they canned the PowerPC chip straight away. Unfortunately for Apple Uncle Sam made them keep it going, because it had already been built into some military kit and Uncle Sam wasn't about to redevelop it simply because St. Jobs didn't like it. (And of course Apple really wanted the PaSemi staff, but they all buggered off to form Agnilux, leaving Apple with nothing. Ha!)

Same thing could happen here. If VxWorks support starts becoming ineffective then Uncle Sam might start getting very cross, and Intel might have to be forced to go cap in hand to the people they've just sacked. You take on a product with very long term support promised to some customers with big sticks, don't be surprised if they wave those sticks at you.

9
0
bazza
Silver badge

Re: Hmmm.....

You owe me a keyboard.

1
0
bazza
Silver badge

Re: Agism and fools

Maybe idiotic, but companies that have done it the other way round have ended up in trouble too when all their remaining staff retire...

If they're trying to save money then that's probably a symptom of the management trying and failing to grow a business. Things aren't easy out there for proprietary expensive real time operating systems.

This is probably some MBA trying to be a clever arsehole when really they should accept that the business has filled the market, especially now that Linux has pinched so much of it, including their own Linux distro. Also selling Linux ain't natural, especially if some of the "magic add ons" are actually someone else's unacknowledged open source efforts... If they want to stay in the market properly then that means taking special care to retain expertise, especially the amount they charge. If they lose too much expertise through these redundancies and the inevitable follow on "fuck this for a lark" departures, they may end up with no business at all.

These days I use Greenhill’s INTEGRITY if I need something like that. It's even more expensive, but is very cool and the company is privately owned by a single individual. If he's happy with his niche then there's no one else to tell him he's wrong, and that's a good thing in my opinion from a long term support point of view. If I were in the market for a properly good rtos then I would look at these redundancies today and wonder about Intel's long term commitment to my project's support if I chose their products...

3
0
bazza
Silver badge

Re: Topical

Linux has certainly had a big impact on their business. I heard that VxWorks never adapted well to multi core processors. Sure they bolted multi core support on top, but didn't do it as thoroughly as they might. Linux has left VxWorks behind performance-wise on multi core processors.

When I first started doing big embedded systems it was all VxWorks, VxWorks, VxWorks. Now it's Linux all the way, with the premp-rt patch set being good enough for all but the most demanding of applications.

Now that Linux has grown tools like kernelshark the there's not a whole lot of technical advantage in the proprietary IDE WindRiver had. In fact, Tornado was at its zenith on Sparc/Solaris, primarily for debugging. You could have a separate debugger running for each thread (well, task), and that was amazingly useful. You cannot do that even today on visual studio or gdb as far as I'm aware. The Windows version was rubbish in comparison.

8
0

So how do Google's super-smart security folk protect their data?

bazza
Silver badge

Re: Hmmm

What does he mean by ahead anyway? Google get to read all our data anyway, it's no surprise that they're ahead of the NSA!

Also, it's not exactly a great advert for Android for work if Google's own security bod doesn't rely on it for his company email on his mobile. If it's not good enough for him, how is it meant to be good enough for us?

8
5

Controversial: The future is data integrity, not confidentiality

bazza
Silver badge

"He noted the irony, however, in the fact that the "five countries most opposed to a national ID – the UK, US, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand"

Not quite right. In at least two of those countries the driving license is a de facto ID card. However there isn't a means for it to be widely used by the holders as an electronic ID card. I'm not sure what sort of political point he's making; most of the objections in the UK centred on the right of not having to carry it, not the existence or utility of the card itself.

5
0

More BlackBerry layoffs: 200 Venice devs binned amid Android shift

bazza
Silver badge

Re: security as a selling point

Sure, for a lot of people "security" seems not to matter too much.

However, now that there's tons of adverts for NFC-pay-by-phone, there's money at stake. If there's one thing that everyone really, really cares about it is money. If people start realising that poor security = money stolen from their bank account, they will care a lot about security. Android's update anarchy is a seriously liability in this regard. Apple, Microsoft and BlackBerry can say, "we've got updates properly sorted". Google cannot.

3
0

How green is your ROCKET FUEL?

bazza
Silver badge

Re: Not just guns

Britain was buying ball bearings from Sweden too. Used Mosquitoes to fly them out. In fact for a short while Britain was buying Swiss Oerlikon anti-aircraft guns built from German steel...

1
0

This new new chip will self-destruct in less than 10 seconds

bazza
Silver badge

DON'T...

...drop it.

7
0

3D printer blueprints for TSA luggage-unlocking master keys leak online

bazza
Silver badge

Re: This is why I always lock my luggage with

Careful, your case might get replaced by a cardboard box with "Luggage" written on it...

21
0

Roll up, roll up: Microsoft, those Irish emails and angry Feds

bazza
Silver badge

Declaration of War?

In some ways seeking to impose one's own laws on another country is tantamount to a declaration of war. Imposition of law is control of that country.

If MS lose this case it will be a pretty bad advert for the USA. Want to run an internationally significant company? Don't base yourself in the USA, lest your international business evaporates.

0
0
bazza
Silver badge

Re: "Microsoft maintains that the data is secured under EU data protection laws"

"Your comment is just more uninformed anti-American bullshit. The 14th amendment applies to the USA, not foreign countries."

Well, kindly go and tell the US judicial system that. Apparently they think otherwise.

0
0

Hacker mag 2600 laughs off Getty Images inkspots copyright claim

bazza
Silver badge

Re: @bazza

Are you sure you aren't confusing copyright with trademarks?

Sorry, yes I was. Too early in the morning. I've had a cup of tea now.

However, not defending one's copyright for a sustained period of time is certainly bad for business. Try asking for judge for large damages when one has ignored many other instances of copying.

In this particular case it will be interesting to see who does end up owning the picture. Unless there some sort of deal between Getty and DeviantArt it seems hard for Getty to sustain this claim.

5
0
bazza
Silver badge

It's not quite that simple. Copyright owners are pretty much obliged in law to actively defend their copyright. If they don't do that then their lack of action can be taken in a court case as meaning that they are happy for the work to be copied. Thus lack of action means risking losing the rights to the work.

So it leads to mad situations like this. It may well be that Getty in this specific case do not actually care at all, but the wider ramifications for their business if they do not act are in general bad for their commercial future.

As usual it's the lawyers who will win, and of course it's lawyers who create the legal problem in the first place. Thanks guys.

5
47

US cop goes war-driving to find stolen gear by MAC address

bazza
Silver badge

Re: I think it's a reasonable idea.

It is reminiscent of the boneheads who insist that an IP address represents an unique user or geographical location.

An IP address at any one moment in time does point to a specific connection point, and therefore a fixed geographic location. That's kind of the whole point of an IP address. If they didn't do that then the Internet wouldn't work...

It's solely a matter of record keeping by everyone involved (the ISPs, telcos, etc) for DHCP allocations, base station connections, etc. to be able to say where in the world an IP was.

I say was, because AFAIK there's no infrastructure for that data to be reliably queried in real time. And that's probably a good thing; criminals can be pinpointed eventually, but no one can be pinpointed all the time live. Unless they choose to leave location services on the mobile switched on...

4
4

Falcon 9 fireworks display grounds SpaceX

bazza
Silver badge

Re: Relying on subcontractor self-assessments

Part of what SpaceX is doing is finding out where the balance point between testing and cost is.

Well, they seem to be doing that the expensive way. I don't know how much that failed launch has cost them, but it would surely have paid for a hell of a lot more testing...

It's really hard to get commercial officers to properly acknowledge risk in all companies. Generally you have to have some sort of corporate disaster before they learn the lesson properly, after which the company might not be around anyway, or they've been sacked, jailed, or whatever. Ask BP, TEPCO,

1
0

Now India probes Google, threatens $1bn fine over 'biased' search

bazza
Silver badge

I don't think Google's search results are that solid. Have you noticed how even if you've put a phrase in quotes Google will show results ignoring the quotes? That makes you look through lots of pages of results (and hence ads) before deciding that no, they have no useful result. Not useful to me, but renumerative for Google.

Also Maps is worse than ever, full of bugs. Tried getting rid of a way point recently on a route?

1
0

US to stage F-35-versus-Warthog bake-off in 2018

bazza
Silver badge

Still won't work. If you say, "There's an A10 around" it'll frighten a lot of people and they'll run away, just in case.

That does not apply to the F35...

6
0
bazza
Silver badge

Re: Multi-Role Aircraft

The English Electric Canberra was pretty good, it was the jet equivalent of the Mosquito. Of course, it's no where quick enough by todays standards, but back in its day it was pretty awsome.

Its first showing at the Farnborough airshow stunned a lot of people. Roland Beaumont made it look like a fighter for agility, speed, etc. but was it was clearly a hell of a lot bigger than a fighter.

EE were pretty good at iconic aircraft; they went on to do the frightening Lightning!

11
0

Rosetta probe spots Comet 67P being buzzed by boulder

bazza
Silver badge

Re: Escape pod

Na, it'd have been the size and shape of a washing machine...

3
0

Big trouble in big China: Crashing economy in Middle Kingdom body slams US tech stocks

bazza
Silver badge

Careful...

It's not really a laughing matter, tempting though a Python reference is. Britain doesn't exactly have a good reputation in mainland China. The Opium Wars were a shameful part in the UK's history.

8
4

Does Linux need a new file system? Ex-Google engineer thinks so

bazza
Silver badge

Re: FAT-free

@thames,

No, we are not stuck with FAT. The only reason FAT is used is because too many people lack the imagination to see that there is Another Way.

If there were a free, well known, acknowledged and widely accepted ext file system driver for Windows then no one would have to use FAT ever again. If such a driver were available it wouldn't matter a damned what MS did or did not ship, because everyone would be using a driver beyond MS's control for cameras, etc. Whatever concerns there used to be about the inefficiency of squeezing a HDD f/s on to a small SD cards is now irrelevant given the huge capacity of even the cheapest one.

There are ext drivers available, but they either cost money or are free but incomplete. The cost of assembling a team to do this properly is surely far less than the money all the manufacturers pay to MS to use FAT.

0
2
bazza
Silver badge

Re:Thames

The CDDL license used by ZFS was carefully crafted to make it incompatible with the license used by Linux.

Isn't the one defining point of GPL that any other license, no matter what it says, is essentially incompatible with it?

10
2
bazza
Silver badge

Re: FAT-free

It's a pity that this ever came about in the first place, and was entirely avoidable. All it needed was for someone to do a decent ext2/3/4 (or whatever) file system driver for Windows and then there would have been no need for FAT in cameras, mobiles, etc.

Of course, there isn't a good finished free one. If the vendors pursued by MS clubbed together to make one it would make things cheaper for them all. It's typical of the short term cost conscious thinking that a lot of companies exhibit, instead of the more ambitious we'll-win-in-the-end-we-can-beat-the-incumbent long term advice that engineers routinely give only to be routinely rejected by company boards.

0
0
bazza
Silver badge

Re: About time there was...

I can remember having to type 'purge' (or something like that) a lot to keep within my space quota on the VAX we had at university...

1
0
bazza
Silver badge

Re: @ Martijn Otto - You mean btrfs, surely

I just wish Oracle would change the licencing of ZFS out so it can be included with distros by default, instead of being cast out into a legal wilderness as it is now.

Well, it's up to them I suppose. It's their code, and I think everyone is grateful that they chose to share it at all. They obviously had specific goals on control and re-use that they felt GPL wouldn't achieve, so wrote a license to suit. It's not Sun/Oracle's fault that Linux is under GPL2. We can make do and mend with building our own kernel modules or getting some pre built ones.

FreeBSD has had no trouble at all adopting ZFS. There's OSX implementations, and reportedly MS briefly considered putting it into Windows. Rigid and unwavering adherence to the current GPL2 guarantees that Linux is always going to be hampered this way, which ultimately is not beneficial for the Linux community.

9
0
bazza
Silver badge

integrated filesystem checksumming, for example, should really be everywhere.

Well in effect it has been for a long time, though not necessarily at the level of the file system. Physical storage has had error detection / correction for a long time now.

It was only with the advent of very large storage devices that their on board ECC became inadequate for "ensuring" (there's no such thing as a guarantee) data accuracy. That's led to file systems like ZFS putting in an extra layer of ECC of their own to compensate.

Incidentally I think the characteristics of the ECC in ZFS were carefully chosen to accommodate the typical bit error rate achieved by HDDs. Getting that right in a file system design is important; just slapping in a CRC something-or-other makes no sense unless one matches it's parameters to the BER of the underlying physical devices. Too much in the file system and you're wasting space and throughput, too little and the BER might be higher than desired. Of course, choosing the BER that's right for the business is another matter...

5
1

Leaked images claim to show BlackBerry's first Android phone

bazza
Silver badge

Re: Rumour mill has it

From what I can tell one of the problems in porting BB10 to other manufacturers' hardware is that the bootloader and some hardware design features are a key security component in the BB10 ecosystem.

Makes sense - no open debug ports, signed boot, who holds those keys, etc, all the things that have to be done correctly to allow BB10 to be secure too. So without those things being exactly as needed on, for example, a S5, porting BB10 to the Samsung would be a big job. At least, this is my speculation as to why we've not seen BB10 on other hardware.

However, if BlackBerry make their own Android hardware they can be in charge of all of those features for themselves, so dual boot or whatever becomes a real option without screwing up any of their security accreditations for the BB10 variant.

Being a BB10 user I won't be rushing out to buy this Android phone from them. But if you are an Androidista, it could be very good. BlackBerry are undeniably good at hardware and their keyboard is also very good (screen or hardware). They're also one of the few manufacturers out there who aren't shy of making their handset a couple of mm fatter and putting in a decent battery. This Z30 of mine lasts the best part of two days. And it's built like a brick ****house.

1
0
bazza
Silver badge

Re: It's fake...

Various experts have been saying they'll be bust imminently for years. Hasn't happened yet.

There are some fairly influential niche users who would find it very difficult to move off the BlackBerry platform. For them it might well be cheaper to buy BlackBerry and run it as is.

1
0

Antiques in spaaaaace! Retired space shuttles cannibalised for parts

bazza
Silver badge

Re: Nasa contacts BBC Top Gear

"As a space geek and a car nerd, that was the best Top Gear ever. I was gutted at the end result, but kudos for the attempt - so close ..."

It truly was one of the great moments in all of Television History. Especially the bit when they put the Top Gear space stickers on the wings upside down...

0
0

Botched Google Stagefright fix won't be resolved until September

bazza
Silver badge

Re: standard Google behaviour, only hearing the echoes

"- it is abundantly clear that the current structure of Android makes it stupendously complex to create patches that reach back a few generations because that also involves 3rd parties such as phone providers for the modem code etc. My hope is thus that their patch will include a move towards a more layered model where there are not so many dependencies to address between the various parties."

It was abudantly clear from the moment Android launched in 2008. Literally every other major operating system back then already had online automatic updating available and was well esablished. Even Google's Chrome web browser had an update feature all the way back then.

It suggests that back then Google treated Android as some sort of toy, not really taking it seriously. They created an enourmous security problem for themselves and their users. Not very bright these Google engineers and businessmen; any ecosystem, including Android, is always one major security incident away from being dropped by its users like a hot potato. Where would Google's mobile search revenue be then?

Commercially speaking they handled Android pretty badly too. By making it possible for the Chinese manufacturers to take Android, de-Googlise it and make it their own there's a billion strong market that Google are missing out on. And they run the same risk too in India. If their intention was to make a platform to attract users to Google's ad ladden services, making that platform hijackable by other manufacturers / service providers seems like stupid idea...

Sure, as far as Google's shareholders are concerned Android has been terrific. However, it's nothing like as terrific as it might have been had they found a way to have full control over Android. Fortunately for Google shareholders mostly care about relative performance, and there MS have obliged by being woeful... That's very fortunate for Google for the following reason.

MS's basic model is a standardised hardware architecture that any manufacturer can make, allowing MS to push out standard binary blobs to all users for updates, etc. And that works, generally speaking. All Windows mobile phones get updates, just like Apple, BlackBerry, etc.

Had MS done a better job of making WinPhone appealling and done so a lot earlier, MS may well have very quickly turned it into a big and enduring success.

But they didn't. Google easily slotted into a good second place (profits-wise) behind Apple, meaning they could satisfy their shareholders. Being a poor third to Apple and MS would have lead to grumpy shareholders.

1
0

Apple's AirDrop abused by 'cyber-flashing' London train perv

bazza
Silver badge

Re: Ho hum,

What could possibly go wrong indeed.

Quite a lot.

Having Airdrop wide open like that is equivalent to running an unsecured WiFi network. You're held responsible for the traffic that passes through it. So if someone is using your WiFi for downloading kiddie porn it's your problem to prove it wasn't you when the police come knocking. Difficult.

So if some horrible person sent kiddie port to an open Airdrop iPhone, that phone now has illegal content on it. The owner would then either have to

1) destroy the phone immediately,

2) hand it over to the police immediately with the image intact (the right thing to do, hopefully the cops know what Airdrop is...))

3) or take a risk that their phone at some point later in time is not forensically examined and the deleted image discovered lurking in the file system somewhere.

If 3) did happen it would be a bit late to claim the image wasn't yours and had arrived unwanted through Airdrop. You'd then have that charge added to whatever else was on the rap sheet to have caused your phone to be in the hands of the cops in the first place.

OK, so that might be a low risk, but it would have a high impact on your life.

2
1
bazza
Silver badge

Re: Ho hum,

Maybe this can be tweaked into another IT sponsored pub meeting...

1
0

Intel left a fascinating security flaw in its chips for 16 years – here's how to exploit it

bazza
Silver badge

Re: Not ironic

Alas there was quite a lot of 16 bit code lurking inside OS/2 :-( A lot of thunking was going on inside.

1
0
bazza
Silver badge

Re: Genuine question!

I too am old enough to remember the 80186. Research Machines (RM) in the UK used them in their schools-focused PCs in around about 1986? I remember that they ran a slightly wonky version of DOS...

1
0

Dying cipher suites are stinking up TLS with man-in-the-middle vulns

bazza
Silver badge

Not sure about being a standard question. Afterall you can always have bacon with anything, or at least fry it on a server if needs be.

1
0

Forums

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2017