Re: Where are the benchmarks?
Phoronix has done a lot of benchmarks on this topic which you may find informative. Not all on Intel architectures either:
23 posts • joined 23 Apr 2008
Very happy with my Unlimited Fibre 2 because:
* No throttling
* No blocking
* 8 static IPv4 addresses (pay extra though)
* Fairly reliable (three outages in the last few years that I am aware of)
* Northerners providing support
* They don't piss and moan when I tell them I'm using a Linux router
Exactly. This is incredibly advantageous for a couple of reasons. Firstly, if somebody else changes an in-kernel API that your code uses, they will generally have to update all users of that API. If your module is part of the tree, they will update it - saving you effort and avoiding bit-rot.
Secondly, it significantly increases the likelihood that your code will be integrated into general purpose Linux distributions, as all they have to do is include the modules in the kernel configuration they build. In the case of WireGuard, some distributions are already including it (using DKMS for example), but this will make it even simpler.
It is a module. From the patch:
+ tristate "WireGuard secure network tunnel"
+ depends on NET && INET
+ select NET_UDP_TUNNEL
+ select DST_CACHE
+ select ZINC
+ default m <------------ compile as a module by default
+ WireGuard is a secure, fast, and easy to use replacement for IPSec
+ that uses modern cryptography and clever networking tricks. It's
+ designed to be fairly general purpose and abstract enough to fit most
+ use cases, while at the same time remaining extremely simple to
+ configure. See www.wireguard.com for more info.
+ It's safe to say Y or M here, as the driver is very lightweight and
+ is only in use when an administrator chooses to add an interface.
Or.....you can say no and they get issued a pin. Apparently my kids can type their pin faster than the other kids read their fingerprints because it can take two or three goes to work. They have to provide pin as an alternative because some kids fingerprints are too hard to read apparently.
I just had a BT line installed today (for the Zen FTTC product that I have ordered). I was given an 8am to 1pm slot. The engineer arrived at 12:30pm and left about half an hour ago (3pm). Apart from the fact he went past the alloted time, I'm pretty happy. I told him exactly where I wanted the copper cable to be attached to my house, and exactly where I wanted the socket and he did exactly what I requested.
For some reason I had to get a separate appointment to do the FTTC part so I'm crossing my fingers that will go just as smoothly.
I was under the impression you can't patent an idea, only a novel way of implementing it. Since the implementation of said idea is (in my opinion, of course) both obvious and trivial to someone having ordinary skill in the art, it would seem to me that the patent should not have been granted.
Let's face it, most people can come up with great ideas, it's only if the actual implementation of them requires an inventive step that patents should come in to play. I'm generally against software patents due to ongoing farce around them, however I would probably concede (if pushed), that certain very limited software patents could be reasonable. One example would be font hinting and anti-aliasing. It's all very well saying "I've had this idea of making fonts look good on a screen", but actually it took some effort to invent an algorithm to do the job.
"Laidback Linux founder Linus Torvalds characteristically understated the relevance of the latest 2.6.34 release in a post about the final release candidate."
That's because he's talking about the difference between the final release candidate and the previous release candidate.
A much more reader-friendly overview of this release is here :-
Okay, not too much of a break. BUT, they will sell a lot less of the Ubuntu ones presumably, and there will be a support cost associated with that (especially with lower volumes). They will also want to avoid numpties sending them back because they don't have Windows on them.
Personally, I'll be ordering one from Tesco as soon as they get the stock.
When the kids misbehave I ban them from the Wii. I can do that because they love it (two boys, 8 and 6). I know when they are teenagers they will want a hardcore gaming console, but for the next 5 years or so I'm sure they will continue to enjoy the Wii (bought for Christmas 2006).
We have about half a dozen Gamecube games that they really like - Mario Kart Doubledash (sadly, soon to be displaced by Mario Kart Wii), Luigi's Mansion, Windwaker, Monopoly and Mario Dance Craze (with a dance mat, and surprisingly good fun).
They love the virtual console games (I wonder if they are included in the games-per-console figures?), especially Paper Mario and Mario 64. In fact, I played through Paper Mario (25 hours accumulated play time omg), and both my sons have played that through twice themselves. That's a hell of a lot of value out of a £4 game.
As for actual Wii games, Wii sports is of course great, we have Ravin Rabbids (apparently Ravin Rabbids 2 is even better), Super Paper Mario (massive let-down after Paper Mario), Fifa 2008 (can't stand it myself but my eldest loves it), Galaxy (astonishingly good), Twilight Princess (put in about 20 hours but got stuck), Star Trek Conquest (utter rubbish), and Mario Strikers Charged (got supplanted by Fifa 2008). I also have Resident Evil but I don't let the kids play that one. The Wii is perfect for that sort of game and I'll probably buy House of the Dead too.
I just bought Mario Kart Wii for them, as I said, so it looks like we'll be playing that solidly for the next month or two. I'm hoping the Network play will be good as the Wii is crying out for this.
Finally, we will of course getting the balance board when it comes out - really looking forward to that.
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019