Adverts are not needed
@Bluegreen and @Michael claim the web requires adverts, why?
When I climbed onto the web back in 1996 there were effectively no ads. Granted the web was a much smaller place but, in my onion, it was a much better place. The sites that were there wanted to be there. They had few motives other than the desire to communicate free from the corruption of the big fat liars of the advertising industry.
It was still easy to purchase goods and services. Retailers had their websites so if you wanted to buy something you located their website. You did not need to be conned into buying some shit you never knew you wanted in the first place.
Some will say that there would be no news without ads, possibly meaning no Register, so be it.
I recall places like Tom's Hardware in it's early days as an enthusiasts blog - before that dreadful word was invented. That is the legacy the current rubbish that is Tom's Hardware trades off. It's no longer worth reading since it has been corrupted by advertisers and business.
I want the web back in the hands of the users not the corporations.
It could still happen. The nice thing about the web is that ideas like Adblock can become widely known about so that enough people will start using it, or something like it, to make current web advertising redundant.
Does this make me a Freetard?
If that means the web is freed from the clutches of the unquenchably greedy parasites of big business and advertising, then I will wear the moniker of Freetard as a badge of honour.