"none of its machine-learning software capabilities have been affected"
I've got a notion that the ML software is learning that machines are shit for crossing the Atlantic without a meatbad around.
16741 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
What a terrible link. There is nothing on that page that gives a hint anywhere that it will explain what password spraying is (and it doesn't). It talks about a new APT group (at the time), about phishing and 2FA, and it mentions "Identity and access management", but there isn't a single mention of password spraying anywhere.
A much better link for those of you who didn't have a clue is this article, which makes things clear in a simple way.
Tell me, is it normal that a company supposedly working for several customers goes and posts its code on a public repository ?
This Cloud thing is driving people nuts. Yes, I can imagine that using GitHub is a great convenience, but for Pete's sake, you're writing sensitive code that is destined to do something for your customers !
Get that stuff off the Internet and back onto a private, secured server !
NVidia is actually giving the Linux community (and others) a free door into its kernel code ?
What on Earth is happening ?
After many, many years of resistance, Borkzilla got the cancer, now NVidia is bowing down (albeit partially).
I hope this is a sign of things to come.
Oh, you mean except where Russia is concerned.
Because Team Rule Of Law has gleefully cut Russia off of everything they could that should have been guaranteed by the rule of law.
Trust the US to invent lofty terms to cover their actions under a veneer of respectability.
I'm not saying that Russia's invasion should have just been ignored, something had to be done (like respect a certain treaty some decades ago), but it's a bit rich to come in now spouting Team Rule Of Law.
If your Rule Of Law has whatever exception you want, it's no longer the Rule Of Law.
I agree with that point.
I use TeamSpeak for my bi-weekly Internet gaming sessions with my friends, but if I ever forget to plug in the USB mike before starting TeamSpeak, the latter will never recognize the former unless I restart the program.
I wonder what technical limitation is at play, here. You can open Windows Explorer before plugging in a USB key, Explorer will find it.
Why is that so difficult for microphones ?
Right, in other words, they are asking someone else to solve the problem.
I guess I'm glad that someone is looking into this, but if the BIS has any clout, shouldn't it be at the forefront of this effort (meaning putting money into it) ?
Why ?
What does it matter where the dish is ? There is a dish, with a paid subscription. You should be able to lob it on the roof of the car and drive around with it. The cubestats are moving at thousands of miles an hour anyway, a few more dozen shouldn't have any kind of impact.
Great idea. I have just one question : who is paying for the maintenance of the account ?
Whether you signed up for free or have a paid hosting account, this new idea supposes that BluSky is going to be dealing with the survivability of said account.
With what money ?
Because that's what it always boils down to.
How is BluSky going to fund maintaining all those free logins ? They are free, nobody is going to pay to maintain them.
I think BluSky is going into PieSky territory.
I would think that the primary duty of a network admin is knowing exactly what is connected to the network and why.
Any router or switch should be accounted for, and any new connection (because a beancounter decided to bring in a new router without asking) should be logged and analyzed to find out where it is and why it's there.
All changes to the network should be documented and a clear overview of the global situation should always be available.
It's not rocket science.
It really is a pity that democratic countries cannot use jail as an impactful means of meaning business.
Because if you are dishonest enough to impede on government sites on purpose just to prove a point, well I think dragging the local CEO to jail until the problems get solved should be standard procedure.
In other words, FB is never going to try that in China.
This, in itself, is a gigantic red light as to why Western companies should not have commercial dealings with China.
If it is my company, then I should be able to fire whomever I please, but no, not in China. China forces you to have one of their nationals at the head of the company, and if that guy doesn't want to step down, you're screwed.
Well that in itself tells me that I would never want to have a subsidiary in China. You can't trust it.
"Law of No Evidence: Any claim that there is 'no evidence' of something is evidence of bullshit"
That seems to be pushing it a bit in my view. If I am suddenly convinced that the disappearance of my sunglasses means that my house has been broken into, but find no broken window, no scratch marks on my front/back door keyhole and no muddy footprints anywhere, then there is no evidence that my house was broken into.
So it's just me forgetting where I put the bloody things.
No evidence is evidence that either you have to look harder, or you have to look elsewhere.
I am really impressed with Wi-Fi technology in general. It deals with radio signals and the fact that we have the technology to use multiple channels at a given frequency is mind-boggling when you think about it.
I mean, you're sending out radio waves. They can overlap. How on Earth do we know how to determine what is part of what signal ?
Any technology that is sufficiently advanced can be regarded as magic. Well, Wi-Fi is kinda magic to me.
We don't care that you didn't admit any wrongdoing.
You're forking over $141 million - that is an admission of guilt. That and the fact that you are forced to stop advertising "free" and change your practices.
You were doing wrong and without this lawsuit you would not have changed.
I really hate this attitude of "well there is no judgement so we dinna do nuthin' wrong".
Somehow I doubt that recovering a rocket booster with a helicopter is going to prove economically viable.
There is no guarantee of recovery, and if the operation misses, the booster is gone and you have spent not insignificant amounts of money on a helicopter for nothing.
Given that there is no way of ensuring success, what is basically needed is to know how many failures they can sustain before going under.
It licenses designs to an entity that is part of the global corporate structure - therefor it is an internal issue and not something that should avoid tax.
If tax laws were capable of dealing with that, then the loophole would be closed.
The fact that every multinational does it, everyone knows it and no country has done anything about it is a clear sign that there is something wrong with taxation laws.
There is.
There is a very small portion of all people holding a managerial position that are actually capable of managing.
Most of them are just capable of barking orders and complaining when results don't follow.
That is not managing.
Managing includes knowing what you are managing, understanding the constraints and being intelligent enough to imagine ways to improve the situation in a meaningful manner. Planning skills are a good bonus.
That is why there are so few actual Managers.
I am totally in agreement with the idea that privacy protection needs to become a branch of Science and treated in the same open and sharing way.
As much as I like the idea, I will not, however, buy an Alexa, or stop using NoScript and uBlock Origin and thus, I will not participate in giving "the enemy" data just so I can find out how they use it.
I prefer the concept of castle walls and drawbridges. I just hope "the enemy" is not in the process of creating the cannon.
That is a dangerous thing to say, even if it is exact. A brain is a brain. I can't see how black people would have a brain that is structurally different from white people.
Of course, I'm not a doctor in the field, but it's a hard pill to swallow, and it brings us two steps away from "Jewish" brains and "terrorist" brains and then it's eugenics all over again.
They say they have a "common understanding" of how these systems normally work. I say they don't, because they cannot justify the results. It's just "machine says this".
That is because they have no log of how the procedures behave. It's a black box and, when said box spits out results that we find acceptable, we say it's working.
When I am confronted with a piece of code that I don't understand the behavior, the first thing I do is set up a log of its functions. When the function starts, what are its entry parameters, what results it sends back. I do a couple of test runs on different data sets, and then I analyze the log results.
In that way, I can understand how the code gets to its results, then I know what it is I need to modify to obtain the desired output reliably.
They're not doing this for their wonderful AI, so they don't know anything about it except what they expect as a result.
That is no way to manage a project.