Forced labour ?
You compare forced labour with computing how many people are getting gassed, and how much more efficient the process could be ?
Wow.
16751 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Apr 2007
"travel bans on the seven and freezing their assets"
I wonder if these Russkies have assets outside of Russia. They probably have multiple crypto wallets, but I haven't heard that The Man can freeze those.
And for travel bans, I'm sure that has them shaking in their sapogi.
It's not a question of amount, it's a question of not needing to remove your eyes one second from that all-important screen that has replaced your hand (and mind, apparently).
Coming next : an Education app which will gamify your child's upbringing, so you can finally ignore the brat completely and fob it off to a slab of plastic and toxic metals while you go on with the more important things in your life, namely your next Twitter post.
Hmm. As far as software is concerned, if you're dealing with a system where all possible values are automatically and instantly computed, I'd think that your software would be fault-tolerant by default, else it would crash.
Quantum computing is a very, very curious beast.
Okay, Space is wierd and very, very large, but if it's already wierd that a 1,100 km-wide ball of stuff has a ring system, it is absolutely mind-boggling that it might have cryovolcanoes.
Jupiter's moon Io has volcanoes, but that's because Jupiter's gravitational field is literally mushing up that little pizza ball. Quaoar does not have such a luxury, and I very much doubt the Sun can be counted on for melting its surface enough at that distance to encourage icy volcanic activity.
So, if this stuff is confirmed - and it still has to be, apparently - then astrophysicists are going to have a hell of a time explaining how a dead ball of ice deep in the freezer of space can be active enough to spout frozen geysers that manage to create a ring in such conditions.
This is going to be a mind-bender of major proportions.
Not going to happen. Closed source has to obey the laws of the countries where it sells, there is no reason to exempt open source from the same obligations simply because the sale price is zero.
Besides, it's not like it's a problem for the developers. You don't want your code to be GDPR-compliant ? Not a problem, your code won't be used in the EU. I don't think there are many non-EU developers who are bothered by that.
EU-centric developers, of course, will have to ensure that their code is GDPR-compliant, meaning that they'll have to amend whatever FOSS code they decide to use to ensure proper compliance. The burden is on them (apply to other countries/law structures as applicable).
But all code should be compliant with the laws of the country in which it operates.
You want proof of funds ? I can provide you with a printout of my bank account balance.
I can even give you my IBAN number, for all the good it will do you.
If that is not enough, I can point you to my bank, where you can phone and ask questions yourself. But you won't be getting a cent either before, during or after the meeting. Not unless I actually transfer money to you, and why would I do that ?
Only in the funny-money universe can you feel obliged to actually give someone you don't know your own money just to prove that you have it.
Good question.
Since COVID I have touched physical money maybe three times. Everything else has been done via VISA or bank transfer.
The digital Euro already exists, so does the digital pound. There is no need to pontificate about a new currency, just create a plastic card with proper security and contactless tech, call it a wallet and let everyone put their money on it like cash at the distributor.
Maybe limit it to €200 max, to avoid the bigger issues.
Get terminals in the hands of stores everywhere, or allow the existing card terminals to deal with the wallet, and you're done.
Yes, "they" will be able to see that I shop at a given supermarket, but "they" won't know what I've bought. The shopping list is not sent to the VISA card handler, only the amount paid.
Which is basically no different from "they" being able to see that I connected to The Register, or that my smartphone is connected to a given cell.
We live connected lives and we have only ourselves to blame for that. Stop referring to some shadowy "they" as an excuse for protecting your privacy. Give some real problems.
Diagnostics are not telemetry (at least, I hope Borkzilla still maintains a distinction between the two).
As far as diagnostics are concerned, I have an explanation of the why because I am a developer and have been since 1996 (TLDR : I like diagnostics).
Whenever I write a script that must execute automatically without human intervention (ie at set time intervals), or executes in the background without pestering the user with error messages (because they're just ignored anyway), I want a log of that code's activity. I want to know the start environment, the data in input, the path that the code took and why and, if relevant, what the code sent back as response.
I want that information stored in a repository so I can consult it when (not if) there's a problem in production, because invariably, weeks, months, or even years after I wrote that code, I'm going to get a call to tell me that my code doesn't work anymore and could I fix that. Invariably, I ask what changed and, almost invariably, the answer is "nothing changed, your script is broken".
Yeah, sure, because I wrote chameleon code that overwrites itself. Pull the other one, etc. But you don't say that to the customer, do you ? Not when you're a freelance developer in any case.
So I know I have my logs. I ask permission to go on site and have access to the application. In customer environment, I access said logs and trace the activity back to where it was working properly, then I take the next log and find out, normally rather quickly, where the issue is.
Correcting the issue may be easy, or it may be hard, but I can print out that log and point to it as to why the code isn't working anymore (because you changed the date format of the server, doofus).
That, to me, is diagnostic data. Since I do not go and post that in The CloudTM, it is only accessible on-site and, therefor, as well protected as the client's server is (aka security is not my problem).
What happens after varies and is irrelevant to my point, which is : with logs, I spend at most 15 minutes finding out what went wrong. Without logs, it would take hours, if not days, just to find out what the issue is - especially when the customer doesn't want me accessing production data.
So I like diagnostics. They've saved my bacon (and my time) more times than I care to count, and they make me more efficient.
I'm just hoping that the term means the same thing for Borkzilla.
Following the data available here, a quarter of the US defense budget for 2023 is $236 billion, not $190 billion.
Choosing to compare that to the US defense budget is curious. Yes, the US of A is certainly the country in the world that spends the most on its military (even though it is the least likely to be invaded), but that fact is irrelevant to the discussion.
If you're going by a quarter of the US defense budget, $236 billion is the GDP of Egypt in 2017 (#44 in the list). $190 billion would be Iraq's GDP for the same year (#52).
It's much less sexy to compare global spending to a country's GDP, but I feel it's much more relevant than comparing to the world's single richest country's military spending.
But hey, American aircraft carriers are sexy, I admit.
And they work a lot better than that Russian one, eh Putin ?
And if your government is preoccupied with "sacriligious" web pages, you live in a country I would avoid.
Things that are sacriligious should literally not be hidden, that way the People can educate themselves and form their own opinion.
But of course, a backwards dictatorship is not interested in an educated population - they just want obedient citizens.
Not like our enlightened Western cultures, who just want obedient consumers.
Yes, we all naturally assume that competent people are in charge.
Until we find out that the beancounters had their say.
Well, I'm sure the beancounters are going to have a chance to revise their opinion (not that I'm saying they'll change it, it's too early for April Fool's day).
From this article, it seems to me that RDA is doing its job. Found unwiped sensitive data on auctioned machines that had also been sold to public buyers. It is largely too late to bring in an NDA and, if the goal is to sweep the whole affair under the rug, well a certain Mrs Streisand who certainly like to have a word with that school.
I'm guessing that the New Year came with an updated procedure concerning the printing and manipulation of the end-of-year share certificates.
I'm also guessing that reprinting was not an option for some asinine accounting reason. I can reprint my invoices as often as I like, they don't change number, they don't change total and printing does not impact my customers' accounts.
But hey, this is the 21st century, so . . .
"it's easy to create some knee-jerk legislation which has unintended bad consequences"
As true as that is, it might be time to put an end to the free lunch buffet that companies have been enjoying since the dawn of the Internet. Borkzilla is first in line for never accepting any liability yet is there any count of the man-years that its successive OSes have cost in time and resources ? Of course not.
I am obviously not advocating that the major OS companies be held liable for every Tom, Dick & Harry's multiple issues - they would shut shop immediately and with good reason.
But if we can't have a guarantee that the software works 100% of the time, we should at least have a guarantee that the OS vendor has every verification and control in place to ensure that, at least as far as security is concerned, every possible contingency that has been thought of has been addressed.
Then, of course, it will be the flying circus of clown acts to list all possible contingencies that should bring liability. I'm sure there's quite a list, but not salting and hashing passwords is something that should definitely entail jail time - and for the Board, not for the developers.
". . Apple and Google stifled competition by forcing apps to be distributed through their stores despite secure, safe alternatives being possible, gave preference to their own apps over third-party alternatives and forced developers to deal with a 'slow and opaque' review process"
Not to mention targetting apps that were not only useful but also better than the "official" app (or provided a user-approved service concerning the OS), banning it and then providing an "official" app that did the same thing.
But no matter, the ball is rolling. The wall around the garden is weakening and nothing can stop that.
I wouldn't be surprised, however, if either one of the phone giants is caught poisoning the alternative "secure" stores with malware-infested apps in order to point and say "See ? They're not as secure as we are. Please give us back our monopoly - it's for the good of the suckers consumers".
Indeed. When the Feds are in your flat taking your toys away, it's a bit late to "go out in a blaze of glory".
When the FBI has a warrant on you, you're goose is a good as cooked. Telling porkies like "someone else bought that VPN subscription" is only believable if that someone else was also buying other stuff and you took action to try to stop it. A "someone" who got access to your PayPal account is not going to stop at buying a VPN sub.
As usual, some dumb fuck thought he was on top of the world and, being the pathetic little slimeball that he appears to be, tried to rake in the cash and get an early retirement.
Well he'll get the retirement, but it'll be without the margharitas or the swimming pool blondes.
And he doesn't deserve them.
Finally a service based on Blockchain tech that is a) serious and b) not a scam.
Looking forward to hearing about how said service handles itself in a country of 1+ billion possible users.
That said, it appears to need a thousand servers to handle 240 million ops per second. I have no idea, but I'm guessing that a traditional database platform could handle that amount of activity with considerably less servers - or blockchain.
I wonder what the server environment of the New York Stock Exchange is like ? I'm willing to bet they've got more than 240 million ops per second going on, and, from what I gather, it's pretty well traced as well.
The USA has a lot of empty space within its borders. Or mountains. Shoot it down when it gets over the Rockies, it'll hit a mountain peak nobody is on.
Obviously, if it lands in a city that would be bad, but surely it is possible to know how long it'll take to drop, what speed it's going at and estimate how heavy it is (they've already shot one down, so they have an idea), and calculate the right place to shred the balloon.
Then ban sales of helium to China. It's not like one more item on the list is going to spark WWIII.
Tsk, tsk, tsk. Come now, you're not expecting a backwards, authoritarian government to actually handle things itself, now are you ?
We're talking about some midieval adminitrative busybody. Of course it's up to someone else to deal with the problem and, until it is, said adminitrative busybody from the millennia before last will wield the only thing he (because of course it's a he) knows : the banhammer.
Nice, heavy and comforting in the mind, he will teach a lesson to all those "modern" barbarians : don't fuck with Pakistan.
Well we have no intention of fucking with Pakistan. It can stay in 1491 if it wants.
"We do not agree with the FTC's allegations and we admit no wrongdoing," the company added. "Entering into the settlement allows us to avoid the time and expense of protracted litigation."
Point #1 : You don't need to agree. I'm convinced that every criminal ever arrested by the police disagreed with being arrested. It doesn't matter.
Point #2 : So you admit no wrongdoing ? Doesn't matter either, since you're essentially paying the fine. We know you're guilty.
Point #3 : You're settling because you're guilty and you just want to cut to the chase in order to minimize the impact on the shareholders.
Bottom line : you're guilty as fuck.
Musk is abandoning Hyperloop as a front for his "genius" ?
I'm sure a superapp will cost less, but you need developers and ideas for that - and Musk has neither. It's easy to say that Twitter needs to become everything to everyone, but that's not a game plan, that's just an objective.
Musk is probably berating this objective every day, telling it to "give 150%" and "not leave the building until you're done".
Good luck with that.
And that was back in the naughties, when the CPU was the only thing doing calculations.
To think of what could be achieved in analysis with today's GPUs and their massively parallel threads . . .
The SETI screensaver would just be a blur of colors.
I'm getting goosebumps just thinking about it.
And the answer almost always will be : "Nothing ! We didn't change anything !"
Followed by an extensive waste of time re-auditing the entire network until, hey, what's this ? And then you get a "Oh yeah, we had to modify a setting on the B portion of the network because bla bla, but that couldn't possibly have anything to do with the outage, right ?".
Grrrr.