My buzzword bullshit detector is now wrapped around its endstop. Thanks a lot, ElReg.
3300 posts • joined 6 Apr 2007
Your boss asks you to run the 'cloud project': Ever-changing wish lists, packs of 'ideas'... and 1 deadline
Re: 'utilise our resources to leverage the actioning of the process-driven outcome'
Don't forget to "counterpoint the surrealism of the underlying metaphor".
You can use a very similar argument to 'prove' that you don't pay income tax.
VAT is chargeable, but mostly reclaimable by businesses on their purchases, which means that it is (in effect) a consumer tax.
VAT is paid on value added (the clue is in the name), which is similar to (but not the same as) gross profit - if you're not adding value, you won't stay in business very long. As a consultant, I have minimal outgoings to offset against my VATable earnings, so it certainly feels like a tax to me when I write out my cheque to HMRC every quarter.
Anyway, as Tim Worstall (late of this parish) would have pointed out, corporations (being merely a useful legal fiction) can never pay tax; it's always ultimately borne by people, whether customers, employees, suppliers or owners - there's no-one else.
The class action lawyers (in the US) are already recruiting. This is going to cost Equifax a minimum of 9 digits.
The UK is the second largest satellite manufacturer (after the US). So not too ridiculous.
Why should freight be carried from New York to Chicago by railroads when we could employ enormously more men, for example, to carry it all on their backs?
Economics in One Lesson - Henry Hazlitt
Hornets (the European ones found in the UK, anyway) are much less aggressive than wasps. They have little interest in your picnic sandwiches, either, their main food source being other insects.
The Argentinians not having the capability to buy (or get as a present) the data from the Chinese, Russians or anyone else who keeps an eye on them from space.
If the Russians could spot submerged nuclear subs from a satellite, we'd have bigger problems than Argentina to worry about. But they can't. They can tell how many boats are in port (as can a tourist with a pair of binoculars), and that's about it.
At least at one point this year there was not - the Admiralty unintentionally leaked the fact by stating which one is in for repairs and which one is participating in various junkets (all away from there).
There are three commissioned RN nuclear hunter-killer submarines, with three more under construction in Barrow, and a seventh planned.
The problem with the Falklands in 1982 was that there was only a token military presence (a couple of dozen Royal Marines) and no way to reinforce by air (the runway being relatively short), allowing the Junta to calculate that they could quickly occupy the islands with minimal risk of casualties on either side. This is no longer the case.
Re: "Prices start at £1,299/US$999."
True, but when the exchange rate was ~£1=$1.50 IT kit was still (often) priced at $1=£1. 'Twas ever thus!
"Prices start at £1,299/US$999."
I realise the £ has fallen against the $ (and one includes VAT and the other doesn't), but that's still a bit harsh!
If this were the plot of a Scandi-noir novel, it would be dismissed as ridiculously implausible.
Whether you call it "appetite for risk" or "tolerance of risk" is not a big deal. But the point is that this isn't (shouldn't be) a purely IT decision, because security is not purely an IT issue. Businesses exist in order to take (and share) risk - but how much risk they're prepared to take is a question that is ultimately for the owner(s) of the business to decide.
It's never (well, hardly ever) the job of Security (or IT in general, for that matter) to say "No". It is their job to point out the costs and risks associated with a particular course of action. Given that there's no such thing as absolute security, security is always about managing risk. The appetite for risk varies greatly between different (and different types of) organisations, which is why 'one size fits all' security solutions are few and far between.
"He says he learned that there was nothing that could have been done to stop the attack"
Because a thing seems difficult for you, do not think it impossible for anyone to accomplish.
Re: Out of Date Discussion
IBM has had in various forms an active and successful policy of employing and promoting strictly on merit since the 1920s
The argument is not about whether such a policy is a good idea, but whether you look at a resultant situation where there is a significant disparity in male:female ratios and conclude that therefore we are not promoting strictly on merit and must apply different criteria to male and female candidates in order to rectify the perceived discrimination.
If we're in a simulation, someone hit it with a hammer, please: Milky Way spews up to 100 MEELLLION black holes
Re: Quid of dark matter then ?
Should have added that there's been a lot of searching (looking for transient gravitational lensing events) for MACHOs (MAssive Compact Halo Objects) with largely negative results. This would be much more likely to find brown dwarf sized objects rather than black holes (simply because there'd be a lot more of them). Which is why the dark matter search remains focused on WIMPs (Weakly Interacting Massive Particles), but with no more success :).
Anyway, these putative (this is only a computer simulation, no-one's actually found any!) black holes would, as stellar remnants, be mostly within the disk of the Milky Way; which isn't where the dark matter needs to be in order to account for the observed anomalies in galactic rotation rates (it would need to be in a halo surrounding the galaxy).
Re: Quid of dark matter then ?
Not really. Mass of Milky Way ~6x1011 solar masses, so even a billion solar masses in black holes is less than a rounding error. If dark matter exists (and it's not a failure of understanding of how gravity works at very large scales), there's more than 5x as much of it as there is baryonic matter.
Kasparov ... was creamed by IBM’s Deep Blue computer in 1997
He beat Deep Blue 4-2 in 1996, and then lost to a version with improved software a year later (2½-3½). I wouldn't call that being 'creamed', particularly as IBM refused a third match (probably on cost grounds).
Kasparov later said (IIRC) that he would have needed a different technique to play against a computer. Playing a human, a good chess player will think along the lines of "it appears my opponent is trying to develop his queen's bishop, but I can block that if I advance this pawn ..."; but that doesn't work as well against a computer, which doesn't have a 'plan', but has just scanned through a lengthy series of all possible moves and identified the strongest.
Apart from that, a genuinely 'strong' AI that could play chess well could also be taught to bake a cake or change a baby within a couple of hours. We're still a minimum of decades away from such a machine.
Re: Given that no matter to speak of ...
All matter and energy was once contained within the 'big bang', as was all our space-time, so it's correct (or at least, not wrong) to say that the big bang occurred within the local galaxy (and within your living room, too). All of the hydrogen and most of the helium we now observe was a product of the big bang (some helium has been created in thermonuclear processes within stars, and some is the result of nuclear decay of heavy elements created in supernovae) as was some of the lithium. The observed ratios of these elements in the universe provides strong evidence for the existence of an initial big bang.
Re: ICAN has Cheese?
Wisconsin = America's Dairyland
Wisconsin court rules in favour of Wisconsin U
74% is a level of accuracy most human psychiatrists can only dream of reaching. (They'll never admit this, of course, because they're 'in denial'.)
Re: "without PGP"
Yes. I'm probably just missing something obvious, but I can see how you can mess up PGP (accidentally deleting your private key, for example), but not why it would take 4.5 months to correct the error.
Re: Ok, so France can't claim the tax cash
Some of it is paid in Ireland, who are often chosen by multinationals as their European HQ (which in EU law they are required to have) because their CT rate is relatively low (see also Luxembourg). But international tax treaties imply that taxes on profits are due where the profits are made - and in the case of Google, it's hard to see that the bulk of their profits are not generated in California.
The US (and California in particular) has one of the highest corporate tax rates in the world, but it becomes payable only when the money is repatriated. This is why Apple, Google etc have vast piles of cash sitting in 'tax havens' in the Caribbean - they're waiting for a US government to reduce the corporate tax rate to something closer to the global average, a change that the Donald has promised to make.
Re: Basic accountancy problem
Corporate (and to a large extent personal taxes such as VAT - hence the arguments about 'tampon tax') are standardised by the EU, but the rates at which they are charged are (within limits) still the decisions of individual countries. The EU has created competition between countries to keep a downward pressure on corporate taxes, partly because (economically speaking) these are a relatively inefficient means of raising government revenues.
Re: Hmmn.. interesting..
the densest that matter can get short of being crushed into neutronium
White dwarf (degenerate) matter is ~1,000,000x density of water. They're much more massive than this object, of course.
Re: "then you're also telling me it has a density 144 times that of the Sun, "
To answer my own question, yes you can get a density 193x water from a tiny red dwarf. There's little radiation pressure to expand the size, as would happen with a larger star. So you get the apparently contradictory result of an object smaller than Jupiter, but 80x more massive; while having a similar composition.
Re: "then you're also telling me it has a density 144 times that of the Sun, "
It may not have a composition identical to that of the sun, but if it's evolved in place as a red dwarf it must be hydrogen and helium (with just a trace of what astronomers call 'metals'), as it's far too small to fuse helium. So a density more than 100x greater is hard to explain. Unless it's some sort of stellar remnant from a much larger object?
We've got two 'adjoining commons' near me (in the Chilterns). One is shown as a 'green space', the other isn't. I think most people would struggle to tell when they cross from one into the other.
The first commercial mainframes I worked on (in the 70s) were Honeywell 36-bit machines running GCOS (originally GECOS for General Electric). They also had the ability to run Multics (and we had the manuals), but there was no commercial software (such as COBOL compilers) available for it.
All customers got the source code for the OS - it was on microfiche. This enabled you to write and implement your own patches, which we did. I think some universities ran Multics, but whether they got the source code, I can't say.
All women become like their mothers. That is their tragedy. No man does. That’s his.
H2 + H2+ → H3+ + e
doesn't balance either for hydrogen or charge
Re: Choo Choo!
Bringing a new station, that's 15 minutes from any onward rail connections, in Birmingham 20 minutes closer to London is essential for London.
Re: "discovering an increased value for Planck's constant"
In theory, yes, but an adjustment of a few parts per billion won't affect very much. Many other key cosmological values are know only approximately - Hubble's 'constant' to just two significant figures, for example.
Re: In all Fairness
TV in the uk is crap.
I can't disagree (and getting worse), but it's still pure gold compared to anywhere else in the world (that I've visited, at least).
I also agree that there's plenty of useful stuff on YouTube, it's not just cat videos. I have three webcams streamed via YouTube running more or less continually while my PC is on, so that's several thousand hours a year of 'watching', right there.
If you want to claim that terror attacks are the result of the West meddling in the Middle East (interference that I'm certainly not trying to argue a case for), how do you explain the attacks on (e.g.) Coptic Christians? What part of Irag had they invaded?
Has someone taken an approx 18,000mph and converted to kms? The correct number for the orbital speed of the ISS is 27,600kph, or 0.2557% of the maximum velocity of a sheep in a vacuum.
That's the migration project from Win2k, I assume?
They were probably unpaid interns, like everyone else on The Grauniad, except for a handful of enormously overpaid 'columnists'.
Re: swaying elections
I'm not sure this is the point "when it can do the most damage". A week or two ago, giving time to analyse the massive cache, would have been far better.
"wine has become more alcoholic"
Some wine, and by up to 20%, not 4x.
It's Russian hackers, FBI and Wikileaks wot won it – Hillary Clinton on her devastating election loss
And there was a Libertarian candidate who polled 4 million votes (absent which I imagine most would have gone to Trump). If you're going to have direct presidential elections, you either need a run-off system (à la France) or a transferable vote - otherwise you run the risk of the election outcome being decided by which third party candidates decide to stand. Had either of these been in place, Trump would probably still have won, though turnout might well have been different (there's little incentive for a Trump voter in California under the Electoral College system).
Hallucinations are pretty normal following lengthy periods of sleep deprivation. A friend attempted the Lands End to John O'Groats cycling record (~48 hours) many years ago - he reported hallucinations when approaching his goal.
Re: Steal a Hyundai?
Fair point. My primary 'anti-theft device' is living between drives, one of which holds a shiny new Mustang and the other a fully tricked out M3. I doubt anyone would target my boring SUV.
The full quote:
“Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit, but the highest form of intelligence.” Oscar Fingal O'Flahertie Wills Wilde