paywall on linked article
presumably it's this one on arxiv...
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1604.07411.pdf
243 publicly visible posts • joined 11 Feb 2008
especially...
"@virginmedia Getting dangerously close to 24hrs with no service. Also dangerously close to me contacting Ofcom about lack of info/updates."
vm doesn't even put scheduled outages on its status pages/ivr system or make the front line helpdesk agents aware, the last one of those i experienced was announced as a few hours but actually lasted three days
vm broadband - great when it works; but when it doesn't, vm's lack of coordination, communication and basic care for its customers is clear to see
but the idea of sticking all my cards/id/tickets on a phone, of whatever brand, seems pointless
cards weigh c. 12g, fault tolerant, unaffected by impact/environmental conditions that'd damage/destroy most phones, don't need charging; lose one/all and you use your phone to report it, oh. and don't need a wallet, they work fine carried naked
phones weigh a lot more, need charging, easier to damage, clumsier to handle, tend to need protection against impact/extreme environment; forget to charge it, break it, or lose it and with no cards or you it's much more likely that you're screwed
you really think it is correct that a newspaper or image or book on a news stand is no longer protected because it's in a public place? or a painting or photo that the artist has displayed in public? or source code?
the creator owns the rights, congratulations to the court for upholding those rights
minor/partial inclusion of a work visible in public is not the same as deliberate duplication for the sole purpose of distributing it for gain (of any kind), which is what wikimedia wants to do
wikimedia being non-profit does not mean it has the right to strip creator's of their rights in their own works
surely this took development resources away from the new version of ios
otherwise the combined effort of these two activities, plus ejecting a new model of fondleslab, would be overwhelming
apple should reign in its ambitions, it's just pushing too hard
no, you are wrong
apple DOES have the key, this is a matter of fact, it is the key that signs the software update
this key enables signing of a crafted image that can then be used to auto update the device, this in turn will allow brute forcing the user's unlock code required to gain full access
btw apple was lying when it said there is no backdoor, there demonstrably is, this is it
only apple has the key to the backdoor, but it has it
apple lies
if a court agrees that a private company has no obligation to comply with a warrant requesting that they help open a box to which they have the key, then that sets a precedent too
i.e. banks no longer need to provide info on money laundering - they have their clients' info, locked in a box to which they have the keys
we live in a civilised society, that requires compromise
the dramatic posturing by apple/others is pure pr guff
if all the wailing ninnies truly believe the fbi etc. has any interest in them at all, they have a seriously misplaced idea of their place in the world, i'm sure you could eliminate at least 99.9% of these delusional fanbois with no lasting impact on humanity beyond improving the gene pool
fact: he's not been found guilty, a court has to decide that, not internet experts, even el reg ones
fact: he's not even been charged with a crime in sweden, it's accusation, you'd think if there was evidence they'd have managed to charge him by now, funny that
fact: he's repeatedly offered to be questioned, which is all the swedes claim they want to do, but for some reason they decline, funny that
fact: he deeply pissed off the usa, uk and others when wikileaks spluffed snowden's blagged info to the world, after which the accusations were brought out to justify extradition, funny that
fact: whether these assange groupies, who by their own admissions chose to get into bed with him and in one case agreed they had consensual sex with him, were then assaulted as they claim, i do not know, but he's not accused of abducting, torturing or imprisoning them
fact: the usa, at the highest levels of government, approved the abduction, torture and detention without trial of many people, including british nationals, some of whom have after many years been released without production of any evidence that they were guilty of any crime
fact: cameron has been accused of porcine necrophilia and he's not sued for libel, funny that, but it doesn't make him guilty, personally i think it's nonsensical, but on the published information, the accusations against assange have exactly the same degree of corroboration, except, unlike cameron, assange claims innocence
the law needs to be consistent, everyone who is advocating extraditing assange without charge, when he has a plausible fear of then being handed over to another country with a proven track record of government approved abduction, torture and false imprisonment, needs to take a deep breath and think about the facts not the bullshit, and wonder why there is one law for assange and another for the rest
if he did assault these women, fine, nail him, but the way things are it does seem funny that the swedes haven't charged him, have proven to be uninterested in questioning him, and seek only to get him onto their territory from where he quite reasonably fears he may suddenly find himself usa bound and alone in the hands of proven torturers
strange how their desire to 'share', doesn't involve sharing the legitimate regulation, oversight and taxation of the old-fashioned businesses they compete with
whilst they're not perfect, i've never experienced surprise bum-rape or imprisonment by the people of slh, hilton, ihg, marriott, sheraton etc., not sure the same can be said of some airbnb customers
‘it’s the wild colour scheme that freaks me out,’ saidzaphod, whose love affair with the ship had lasted almost three minutes into the flight. 'every time you try and operate these weird white controls that are labeled in white on a white background, a little white light lights up in white to let you know you’ve done it.’
...just equip your drone with a gun and invoke the second amendment
drone registration would be no less than gun registration, which of course is totally unacceptable, call out the nra, march on washington, lynch that african muslim guy, etc.
job done, stand by for strafing
it's sad to see people who were trying to build something get hurt
but in this case i feel i have to make an exception
i do hope all the exploitative, money grubbing, race to the bottom, scum sucking, shit for brains, twats who thought creating and funding this invitation to abuse was a good idea, lose every penny
then i'd like them to slip in the street and land in a large steaming turd, not be injured, but as they lay reeking, get pissed on by people passing by who mistake the steam for smoke and are therefore being positive in their output
i remember people in the repair centre putting any dirty keyboard assembly under the tap and giving it a good scrub, the operators couldn't be bothered to clean them so they would put in a fault call to get a clean one
another sight that remains with me was a processor board that according to the ticket had somehow been inundated in cream, by the time it reached repair it had become a new blue cheese
i was so happy to move to r&d where the biohazard risk was lower
"This case is a little more complicated than that of a normal picture of nature."
er, no, otherwise you can make the argument that, for instance, jackson pollock doesn't have copyright in paintings because he didn't have control of what the paint did, it was all down to fluid dynamics
or, no copyright exists in any photographic image because it is based on detection of photons, which any fule kno are non-deterministic, so any photograph is simply the result of random chance
etc.
of course the photographer had involvement and is responsible for the existence of the image: the camera was his property, he took it there, hr dropped it, like jp's paint it was then outside his control, and as a result of this uncontrolled action an image was captured, he then made a deliberate decision to retain the image and cause it to be transferred and published, it's his
"And yet it will still end up being filled by someone with a resume full of lies and no ability to prevent all the politics that will derail any project he is tasked with."
that was going to be my strategy: blag it, new laptop, big monitors on desk, comfy chair, enjoy life, a few fact finding missions somewhere warm and sunny, rake in the cash as fast as possible until it's obvious even to uk.gov that things may, just possibly, be a smidge overdue, exit with a golden handshake for personal reasons as the price of not rocking the boat, then with reputation and cv enhanced, automatically be shortlisted for the next one on an even bigger package
on those awful days when you have to endure 6+ hours of webex, a desk phone with a proper headset is an awful lot more comfy than a mobile, and as our global megacorp is run by bean counters who confused byod with "buy your own phone, pay for company calls yourself and you cannot expense them", i'm buggered if i'm paying for the experience myself
mine has mute button, can't ever recall using one that didn't, and i have the speed dials set the way i like, much faster than faffing around with a mobile that's had the corporate security policy inflicted on it so that it locks after 30 seconds inactivity
the only improvement would be ditch the ip telephony and get back to a nice old definity where voice quality starts high and stays that way no matter how many people are on the phone at the same time