Re: Beats or no Beats
But you wouldn't want to listen to classical music through Beats headphones either.
929 posts • joined 17 Jan 2008
But you wouldn't want to listen to classical music through Beats headphones either.
But I'll forgive you this time, as a fellow Squeezebox user. Just don't understand Sonos - it seems very expensive for what it is.
I wonder how many Sonos users also have iPhones?
I was pretty sure that was the hedgehog.
To see Gregory Peck.
...the incompetent people who grace the hallowed halls of Wal-Mart and Best Buy will sell anything to the uneducated who are really looking for a laptop that can run real software, not an "app"!
If you know you want to run real software, you already know you don't want a Chromebook, and so the incompetents will not be able to sell you one.
If you're the "uneducated" mentioned above, you probably don't want to run real software - you'll be happy with an "app". You probably don't know (or care) what the difference is. And it's very likely that a Chromebook will work well.
...and I don't really understand why.
For what 99% of users want, they are perfect. No worries about backup (it's up on the cloud, so you don't lose it), no worries about remembering to update (as it happens automatically).
The more recent ones allow you do quite a lot locally, even when you're not connected to the internet. And more and more, not being connected to the internet is becoming the exception, not the rule.
Yes, they can't run Office. But how many normal users need Office? Yes, they're not much good for gaming (though there ARE some good games) - but then, niether is a cheap Windows machine.
I use mine all the time. My daughter uses hers all the time. And if all you want to do is surf the net, look at YouTube, write a few basic documents, and dash off a few mails, I can't think why you'd need anything else.
I'm on a 120M connection with VM. I get not far from 120M at 8:00 am on a Sunday morning, here in NW London. But at 8:00 in the evening, due to contention, I get 20M if I'm lucky - as every other house in the street also has Virgin Media.
So if I'm increased to 152M, I reckon I might sneak up to 25M...whoo-hoo!
So we should abandon the science labs in Antarctica, because they are only political statements, and because robots can do the job so much better?
If we really want science labs to explore the moon properly, they need to be on the moon, and staffed with people (and, yes, robots).
...we would have, by now, had a permanent scientific colony up there, which would have been able to analyse this sort of thing much more accurately and effectively.
They also plan to offer gold-plated Galaxy and HTC products...
But I bet that over 90% of the gold-plated phones they sell are Apple.
Not forgetting, please, the Command Module pilots:-
Richard F Gordon
Stewart A Roosa
Alfred M Worden
Thomas K. Mattingly
Ronald E Evans
They didn't walk on the moon, but they went with those who did. And they are too easily forgotten.
...and the bevy of California girls.
Well, I personally am very grateful to the Register for bringing it to my attention.
I went with my sixteen-year-old daughter to see this last night. We both agreed it really was an exceptional performance - I have rarely, if ever, walked away from a film feeling like that.
But yes - it's a bit of a minority interest, and that's a damn shame. The assumption is that as it's Ibsen, and theatre, it must be highbrow rubbish. Actually, it's a marvellous play, brilliantly acted, and very accessible.
I am quite sure that the people who did it are exceptionally proud of it - and so they should be. Lesley Manville, Jack Lowden won Olivier Awards for their performances, and the director Richard Eyre won the Evening Standard award for Best Director.
It was awesome, really it was. Sorry you missed it.
What does it do with the grass cuttings in general?
I have a small Bosch mower which is all I need for my two mini-lawns. But I have to empty the grass-cutting box at least once half-way through cutting. So what does this thing do?
I think the third picture means that this should have been labelled as marginally NSFW.
...businesses would bring pressure to BEAR...
But you've had an upvote for the sentiments.
So you can watch a TV show in a smaller picture while you're playing a game in the main screen?
Blimey, if the game is so easy that you can watch TV at the same time, then what's the point of it?
Come to that, if the TV program is so uninteresting that you want to play a game while watching it, why bother to have it on?
If you are driving close enough to someone to see them doing that, you're driving FAR too close to them at 70mph...
The silly ram and HD limitations almost always simply make it a no go.
Hard disk - it's got an SSD so that it starts quickly, and if you want a bigger one, it's a LOT more expensive. What do you need large amounts of disk for? And once they get the promised local connection to a shared disk on the home LAN, there will be even less reason to need a large disk.
RAM - it's got 2GB. 4GB would be better, but again would cost more. People who use it with 2GB are saying that it zips along perfectly fine. What do you get with 4GB that you can't do with 2GB? Open forty tabs instead of twenty?
Like the poster above said - how about trying one, rather than just looking at it?
I was taught at school that the expected result of the drunkard's walk is sqrt(n) - that is, after n paces you'll be sqrt(n) paces away from your starting point.
But that monte carlo simulation seems to indicate that the distance is actually something like 0.9sqrt(n).
So what's going on here?
Therefore, telling Google your password - why not?
I can't even be arsed to vote.
Just supporting everyone else. If you don't like any of them, vote "none of the above" - ie spoil your paper. It's still better than not voting. If you don't vote, you have no right to complain about the result.
I think it would be interesting to have a "none of the above" selection on elections - I think it would win an overall majority frequently. And if enough elections went that way, perhaps politicians would start actually doing some good.
If I'm listening to music, or watching TV, I don't find it necessary to tell anyone else what I'm doing. I don't, frankly, understand why anyone else would be interested.
Just one more reason not to have Facebook.
...and, come to think of it, the Sammy would probably handle 99% of what she uses that for, at 20% of the price.
Which is the point that most people seem to miss. For what 99% of people do, 99% of the time, the Chromebook is perfect.
Get her a full blown laptop with productivity software. Chromebooks and tablets are appliances.
Getting them locked down computers and tablets is seriously ruining their education.
If by "her" you mean my wife - she needs an appliance, not a full blown laptop.
If by "her" you mean my daughter - she uses her Chromebook for her homework (essays, investigating the net et al) and uses her desktop Mint machine for more interesting stuff.
Excellent little machines for basic email and web access, which is all most people want. I have one, my sixteen year old daughter has one, and my wife will be getting one (with a touch screen - she likes touch screens) when her current PC dies.
I've been wondering what had happened to El Reg. There have been two or three recent articles which have simply reported climate change stories without any obvious bias. But this is back to normal - publishing an article which clearly indicates that global warning is nothing to worry about, and a sideswipe or two at the IPCC. What a relief.
...specs are ALWAYS overpriced - particularly in this country. Those of you who don't have to wear glasses would be appalled at what we short-sighted people have to pay out.
What you pay for a pair of glasses (particularly the frames) does not come close to reflecting the actual cost of the materials.
"If you want smaller printer drivers switch OS to Linux, most drivers there are an incredible 0kb due to not being written. You won't be able to print anything mind."
If you're going to slag off Linux (even as a joke), at least pick on something it doesn't do well. HP printers are brilliantly supported by Linux - just run "hp-setup" and follow the instructions. It'll find your printer, set it up and print perfectly to it, whether it's a direct connection, a network printer or even a wireless one.
Score points for LastPass here.
If you run their "security tester" which checks your passwords for duplicates and strength, they also give you a list of the people you are connected to who may be vulnerable, and what to do.
"What to do" was basically "WAIT" if the company had the vulnerability, but hadn't patched; "Change your password now" as the company had finished patching; and "You are now OK" once you'd changed your password.
This was alluded to in the article - but the original albums were mixed in a certain way, which we're all used to from the original LPs. These new mixes just sound odd. I bought a copy of Argus (Wishbone Ash) when it first came out on CD; I then bought a new "remastered" version. OK, arguably, the sound was clearer. Actually, it was probably just at a higher level which meant less dynamic range - and the mix was a complete mess. Awful.
So when I play that album, if I'm feeling choosy, I go back to the vinyl; otherwise, I play the original CD which I'm fairly sure was just a direct transfer from the final master of the vinyl - and frankly, as a result, is closer in sound to the original vinyl that anything else. And I think it's a crying shame that more CDs of classic albums are not simple direct transfers from the final master of the vinyl.
And yet another thing - who the hell WANTS to listen to Bennie and the Jets in 5.1 audio? Why would I want to hear music coming from behind me?
I have heard it said that once you set it up correctly, it's no fuss at all - it works transparently.
I heard of a particular problem that someone had where they tried to buy a book from Google Play in ePub format, only to find that the book had somehow mislaid all the apostrophes and quote marks. So the person bought the book on Kindle (whose version of the book was fine), downloaded it to his PC, drag'n'dropped it into Calibre, uploaded it to his ePub reader and it was fine. (And he got his money back from Google Play, too.)
I, of course, know no more details about how he did it, and I have no comment on the legality of it.
"...you can literally see the sound as it envelops a room."
Really? That must look strange.
If cheapskate audiophiles want to go for wireless streaming, they should go for the old Squeezebox stuff, which is still reasonably easily available second hand. And if they are rich audiophiles, then the Squeezebox Transporter goes for over five hundred quid second hand on eBay.
It's a damn shame that Logitech stopped selling the Squeezeboxen.
...from the same shop, a stereo amp, two small bookshelf speakers, take the sound output from the 2 phonos on the back of the telly and it'll STILL sound massively better than the TV. Add a cheap CD player and you've got a good hi-fi in the front room - add a Squeezebox classic second hand and you can stream all you like. (And the second hand squeezebox will be the most expensive item you buy).
Seventeen hundred quid? Seriously?
I have some sympathy with your point, but in the interests of accuracy, I should point out that a fag is a cigarette, and the unused end of a cigarette is known as a fag-end or sometimes a butt. Don't know of a word or phrase for a discarded unused end of a cigar.
But how did you learn to do it - and can you still do it?
I originally solved the cube without recourse to any instructions - took me a couple of months. (My first ever success was a fluke, where I did the first two layers and the third just appeared correctly - to my total astonishment.) But as a result, I have those slow but reliable algorithms fixed in place in my mind (and muscle memory!). I can still solve it now - but it probably takes me 3-5 minutes - and using my algorithms, I doubt if it could be done more quickly than two minutes.
But those algorithms work, and I suspect I'll never forget how to do it now. It's still a good trick for impressing your kids and their friends.
Yes, it's impressive the first time a Lego built machine + a phone solves the cube. I thought it was amazing when I saw the video for the first time last year. And it's quite something that it can do it under five seconds. But getting it down for 4.3 seconds to 3.5 (or whatever it is) is just improvements in technology - it's not anything new any more.
There's also the point that a random setting may have a "best" solution which takes a certain number of moves. Another random setting may have a "best" solution which takes fewer moves. If the cube happens to be in the second setting, the robot will solve it more quickly. How do you tell whether you've merely got a relatively simple start position?
Hence, the "meh" icon. It was impressive once. Now it's just more of the same.
Don't try to summon my enthusiasm, because I haven't got one.
Endorsed by Ludwig Van Beethoven
Who was deaf.
Indeed, it was a luggable, rather than a portable.
But I remember working for a small company which was building embedded systems. I went along to demonstrate a new release for a customer. They pointed out an error; I was able to fire up the Osborne, correct the software, attach a PROM burner, burn a new prom and install it, and demonstrate the problem was fixed - in less than fifteen minutes. One happy customer. Something like that simply wasn't possible before the Osborne - you'd have had to return to base to fix it.
But haven't we come a long way since then?
Can't have it both ways.
What arrant nonsense.
If a woman wears a bikini in public, it's normally in a place where she expects to be looked at - for example, on a beach or at a swimming pool. And she can't really complain if photos are taken of her. (But even if a woman is wearing a bikini in public, I think it's reasonable to be hacked off if someone is taking a photo of her as if it were an upskirt - no matter how legal it is.)
A woman who is wearing a skirt is reasonably entitled to not expect a man to be trying to look up said skirt - and is certainly entitled to assume that he won't reach down with a mobile phone to take a photo up her skirt.
And even if a man gets a glimpse up a skirt, it's just one of those things - quite a kick if you're a teenager, as I remember. But taking a photo of said view is just damn pervy. It's the difference between glancing at a woman's cleavage and staring deliberately at her breasts.
I once had to read a serial number for a customer support call. It was ridiculously small. I couldn't read it. My sixteen year old daughter could only just read it, and couldn't be 100% sure she'd read it correctly.
So I took a photo of it with my phone and zoomed in. Problem solved. I love modern technology.
There was a young man called Menzies
Whose kissing drove girls into frenzies:
Till a virgin one night
Crossed her legs in a fright
And shattered his Google Glass lenses.
Indeed. 4K TV will be for people who admire the quality of their TV screens, not for people who actually want to watch TV.
Just like top-end super-de-luxe hi-fi is the preserve of people who spend their time listening to how good it sounds, not the actual music.
So if there are pretty girls (or boys) to look at in the park, why take the laptop?
...the software makers might start coming on board too - which won't do any harm.
All we need now is a few Chromebooks at a couple of hundred quid with a better screen than 1366x768.
...creates a brand-new sensorial and atmospheric experience that utilizes space, space itself.
As marketing bollocks goes, that is pretty awesome. Sensorial, eh? You can smell it and touch it too?
Michael Gove ahead of both of those.
Also Nick "Broken Promises" Clegg.
Oh, and Tony Blair - for winning a landslide Labour victory and then spectacularly letting everyone who voted for him down.
Actually, why not just send all the cabinet members of all UK governments of the last twenty years or so? God knows they've completely failed to do their normal jobs properly.
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2017