Actually, change my mind - it's a trick question. You can't have better than 50% accuracy of positives, as any more than 99.9% accuracy of the assessment can't be done with only 1,000,000 claims. You can't have fractions of claims being positive or negative.
141 posts • joined 17 Jan 2008
I make it 99.9990415565743% accuracy required (to get 99.05% of accuracy of positives).
Excel goal seek to the rescue, but not with enormous, erm, accuracy...
Edit - actually get a closer result with 99.9989889889889% to give 99.000088991885% positives
His story about safe cracking at Los Alamos is a perfect example of this kind of thinking. He was regarded as the security risk after announcing he could open an important safe at the high security site. The question of the safe not being fit for purpose failed to be addressed.
What about denial of service?
Forgetting the man i the middle risks for a moment, if every interfered with packet gets dropped automatically, wouldn't attempting to eavesdrop have the side effect of blocking the entire communication?
"focus on the underlying principles rather than obsess over the companies dominating the space"
Said one of the companies who's dominating the space...
If only I could pay
I'd be happy to, but the option is rare. And even when you do pay, it doesn't necessarily follow that you don't get hit by advertising and data harvesting anyway.
Well well well well...
...well well well well well then.
Progressive Web App? Fluent Design??
Web apps may make sense on a phone, but if I'm on a desktop or laptop (where Windows is typically found) why the pissing hell wouldn't I just use the browser? The version of Twitter (or whatever) in the browser is always going to be up to date.
If I could only spend a few hours with their board and point out what using some of their products actually feels like for an end user I'd start off with "Dudes! WTF!..."
And I quite like Microsoft generally. Imagine...
Re: 10 years too late
Re: Nuke notes
My company used to use Notes for an extensive Quality Management System. It ticked the necessary functionality boxes, but it was utterly abysmal experience to actually use it, and I mean really ****ing terrible. I'm not keen on the prospect of it returning.
They're currently rolling out Sharepoint and Onedrive, and we're told that this will 'replace all network drives'... I find this all rather terrifying, especially as there's no explorer integration planned for it yet!
Harder to Control?!
Zuckerberg also wrote that encryption and cryptocurrency offer the chance for more decentralization, but said "they come with the risk of being harder to control."
Of course they're harder to control! The reason they exist is to be decentralized and avoid being 'controlled'. And now he simultaneously sees that as a risk, and he wants more decentralization?
Someone please punch him in his boneless face.
Re: Two years?
Well Google need to get on with sorting this out then. My nine year old laptop still gets regular OS updates and security patches, and it's original cost was comparable to an upper mid range smartphone now.
Why do I get the impression no one seems to have a genuine interest in solving this problem expediently? Oh, that's right, they'd all rather sell new hardware as often as possible instead...
Hang on a minute...
It's only 1 in 10 Britons once you subtract the 10% that don't use the internet at all, that sounds much more realistic.
Strangle them at source - but where is the control or visibility?
I still think there's not enough easily accessible and usable options for controlling how devices and applications have access to various resources. Users need easier access to control options and to be able to visibly understand and decide what the technology they're using is doing.
For example, it should be trivially easy on any OS or platform to sandbox a program or app entirely from local or network resources, but it just isn't, on anything. We lack the ability to use software at our own discretion of trust. In fact, everything seems to be engineered in entirely the opposite way. And it's not that convenience really depends on our blind trust, it's just that we're being abused in to thinking so.
Re: Excel drives me nuts
That's because it's not using the clipboard in the way you think it is. If you want to copy something and have it persist in the 'normal' clipboard, highlight it in the formula bar and then copy.
The excel copy mode is dynamic, so you can copy a cell or range, paste elsewhere, then allow something to update the values in the existing copy range and then paste these new and different values again, all without having to re-copy the original range. Magic.
Particularly this bit, really hits the nail on the head:
"However, there simply is no good alternative to a spreadsheet for building logical and parameterised (eg business) models for many cases, at least to prototype and to get the logic right. Such models can be crystalised into a compiled, performant and version-controlled artefact at a cost, and then become difficult to tweak/update too."
Although quite often that crystallization process never happens, because of either cost, lack of technical resource, or the model needs to be flexible and dynamically change in a way that can't be done easily on a compiled platform (not by the average user anyway, who's typically the owner of the decision making process).
I'm presuming 'moved the DAC out of the phone' is a subtle euphemism for 'they've bloody well gone and removed the bloody headphone jack!'?
Jokes on them...
"...after seeing Google-served adverts on the web"
What makes them think I see any adverts on the web?
ICAN has Cheese?
What's the cheese all about, did I miss something?
Weren't there recently a bunch of security concerns regarding the 'skills' available on Amazon's Alexa? What makes you think I'd be more inclined to trust Microsoft?
My first coding experience...
Was laboriously typing BASIC line by line from from a book of games written for the Oric 1 (before we upgraded to the much more lovely Oric 48K). Typing and then debugging would take hours if not days, and the results were, well, often a bit shit.
Looking back, I, erm, don't think it did mE aNy LoNG tErM hARm....
60 Programs for the Oric 1 http://www.defence-force.org/computing/oric/library/lib_coding_basic/
Impressive analysis but
I still don't like the term AI being slapped on every bit of machine learning or 'big data' analysis...
Maybe I'm just old fashioned, but I liked it when words and definitions had specific meanings.
Re: If you want good trains
Actually, there's some quite nice trains in the museum in York, especially the super cool 1960's Bullet Train.
If you want a good train service however, that's a different matter...
‘a computer program someone wrote.’
Precisely. Especially the personal assistants, which after nearly two decades of advancement are just as frustrating as Microsoft Clippy. This is not AI, it's data whoring sh*t.
I personally doubt that the majority of middle class jobs will be replaced by AI, it's simply that the roles people have will change to reflect the increased capabilities of man & machine as a system. The personal computer revolution has completely re-defined what it's possible to achieve in the workplace, not simply replaced a bunch of typists and clerks like for like.
The world will get more complex, and we'll all need to do a more complex variety of tasks to deliver competitive outputs.
It's a simple recipe...
Problem: No one is using MS Store.
Solution: Take something that everyone uses, and make it only available from MS Store.
Re: Reminds me of...
"The Ravenous Bugblatter Beast of Traal is a vicious wild animal from the planet of Traal, known for its never-ending hunger and its mind-boggling stupidity. The Guide calls the bugblatter the stupidest creature in the entire universe - so profoundly unintelligent that, if you can't see it, it assumes it can't see you."
Seems about right.
Reminds me of...
...that great Richard Feynman safe-cracking story at Los Alamos. When he informed the General (I think it was) that classified military documents were at risk because he could easily open the safe door, Feynman was instead excluded from accessing the area where the 'safe' was. He was seen as the risk, not the fact that the expensive new safe was not fit for purpose.
Re: precise measurement of the length of the Saturnian day continues to elude us
Maybe I'm missing something obvious, but when a gaseous planet spins, and different latitudes spin at different rates, what exactly ought to be considered as 'a day'? Furthermore, why is it significant?
"So glad you brought your childhood Amiga vs ST rants with you into adulthood."
Once Atari, always Atari. My trusty 1040STE is still boxed and ready in the attic, just in case this whole PCMasterrace thing doesn't work out...
Please forgive my ignorance, but downloading another OS via the windows store! What kind of sorcery is this?
Does it install alongside windows as a dual boot (risking Grub destroying your RAID arrays; this happened to me last time I tried to set up a dual boot!) or does it run virtualised inside Windows?
Re: Paradox. Everyone hates ads. Everyone wants stuff for "free".
Actually, on reflection I think I'd rather pay, it's just that I don't often find much worth paying for.
If there was on option on Google that let me pay £5 a month for their services and freed me from all their insidious advertising and data collection, I suspect they'd be getting a hell of a lot more money than they could generate through advertising to me or using my data.
I know the value of their data set is only realised when aggregated over lots and lots of people, but in the end it's all just snake oil to lure the advertisers. It can all be done with good old simple subject matter context, so that adverts relate to the content of the internet, not the personal information of people.
...and is this the arbitrary code you selected?
Re: Clever image processing algorithm
Whilst many of us are probably fond of a bit of creationism bashing, there's a time and a place.
And that time and place was AOL Instant Messenger, in 1998.
"the programme has not delivered value for money"
Seems to be a recurrent issue in Scotland for some reason... See also Scottish Parliament and Edinburgh Trams.
The new Forth bridge, apart from a bit of a delay, appears to be going well though; unfortunately big projects have become so tarnished that hardly anything positive gets said about the few successes anymore.
Re: Big Banks
And you can't have a two tier system of proper encryption for banking and lesser encryption for everything else, because you could feasibly communicate using financial transfers by ciphering values into coded messages.
If people are determined enough they will find a way to communicate in secrecy. The bluster about back-doors into messaging services is more political than real. Unless, of course, there already are backdoors in all the common messaging services and we're being gamed.
So maybe this is why my Freeview box feels so under-powered that it often struggles to bring up the TV guide, perhaps it's busy doing someone else's malignant bidding - using higher user privileges than I've obviously got too!
I've never been canvassed for an opinion either when exiting a polling station or at any time beforehand; furthermore I’ve never even seen anyone else being canvassed. Who is being asked?
You’ve got to wonder where all the data comes from, surely getting an accurate poll for all the constituencies would involve canvassing across a range of times of day to get account for voting behaviours in different demographics?
Personally I like to completely ignore it all till the final results are in. And even then...
Re: As Liberal Party of Old would have told you
Which is a shame, because those all that effort going into exit polls lasts <24 hours, as the 'actual' polls get counted.
Guess it's just taking a gamble, hoping to justify the narrative, and possibly being able to say 'told you so', and 'look at us, finger on the pulse, our news is the best news' etc..
One bus to rule them all?
Looks like more and more things are going to consolidate to using PCI-E connections in a system, whether an internal slot or via high speed external connections like USB C. Storage is increasingly going that way - and as Optane starts to blur the lines between storage and memory, I wonder if DRAM will end up going that way too, once things get fast enough?
Re: Not sure the hate is deserved
But walking around with a large set of bolt cutters helps identify you as a bike thief with a high degree of certainty. It's a substantial risk you'd get caught.
You can reproduce sound at any phone, anywhere, anytime, using almost any equipment, and with complete impunity. Doesn't necessarily even have to be the target's own device.
The only way of this being useful is if the user's voice is identified AND the response is uniquely identifiable as them. Rather like speaking a password or OTA code. Utterly useless. The alternative is hidden forensic signals in ALL available methods of recreating the sound of a voice (akin to hidden yellow printer dots), but that's almost unlimited scope of equipment and thus entirely out of control.
just increase the volume and stand further away...
Local Network Security
I think there's a lot more improvement that can be made to general domestic router / firewalls to help with this... Most contract supplied kit (BT Homehub etc.) is too locked down, or where control exists it's too complex for most people to grapple with.
I shouldn't take a networking wizard to be able to set any connected device to local communication only, or to separate devices into groups with differing access to each other or the internet. Or better still, firewall individual devices to only be able to connect to certain update IP's. I'm sure all of this must be possible, it's just complicated to set up AND maintain.
Which brings me to the next problem. Someone (even if it's google!) need to provide a secure centralised service for firmware / software updates that's completely agnostic to manufacturer's own support commitments. Imagine if there was one single URN that all devices, could reliably get the latest patches. Firewalling other random connections would be a whole lot easier, and it would be a lot more obvious who and what was a security risk.
If I could guarantee that my internet connected 'whateverthehellitis' could only talk to one approved update channel and also only to my smartphone app then I'd be more inclined to allow them onto my network.
Similarly, if you could guarantee a smart TV could only talk to BBC iplayer (and whichever other services you want to use) it would be a happier world. Unfortunately these things are just not built for users to have any control of. Until they improve the 'smart' functionality remains firmly off. It's worse than the wild west out there.
Upgrading a component in 2017
Where are the RGB LED's???
Most of my VBA code can also be generalised as:
You've found my secret!!
Re: But who need a smart TV
It's almost like the manufacturers have a vested interest in you connecting your TV to the internet, so they can access reams of usage and customer data... The provision of a service useful to customers is just an afterthought, or a disguise.
I would rather just have a decent, but dumb, display panel with LOTS more inputs.
I've already got a 'smart' dishwasher (resolutely not connected online), and I can't think of any practical advantage to being able to switch it on remotely from my phone. Not until it's smart enough to load and empty itself anyway. I can only assume that Bosch want telemetry data about it's usage - at my expense and at my security risk. F**k them.
Reminds me of something...
Toaster: Howdy doodly do. How's it going? I'm Talkie, Talkie Toaster, your chirpy breakfast companion. Talkie's the name, toasting's the game. Anyone like any toast?
Lister: Look, I don't want any toast, and he doesn't want any toast. In fact, no one around here wants any toast. Not now, not ever. No toast
Toaster: How 'bout a muffin?
Lister: Or muffins. Or muffins. We don't like muffins around here. We want no muffins, no toast, no teacakes, no buns, baps, baguettes or bagels, no croissants, no crumpets, no pancakes, no potato cakes and no hot-cross buns and definitely no smegging flapjacks.
Toaster: Aah, so you're a waffle man
Re: At least...
You say 12 months old like that's somehow decrepit?
If you bought a decent laptop (seeing as the prices are comparable) should you be 'proud' that it still gets security patches after only 12 months? You'd be raging if it didn't.
I use a laptop that's around 8 years old, and it still gets OS updates. Why should we have radically different expectations for phones?
The last time I bought a 'flagship' phone (Galaxy S3) it cost ~£500 and got 2 or 3 updates within a year and then nothing. And funnily enough, that WAS the last time I bought a flagship phone... There should be a recognisable certification that a device will receive timely updates for a minimum of 3 or perhaps even 5 years. That way I'd me more inclined to invest in a phone that I expected to last more than 12 months.
With vendors and carriers not providing updates for most phones, at least there's a handy mechanism available to write the patch into the device memory yourself?
I bought an internet connected dishwasher...
just so that I can take delight in never connecting it to my internet! Smash the system!
(and it still manages to wash the dishes just fine...)