* Posts by Yes Me

931 posts • joined 11 Jan 2008


Is Oppo short for Opportunistic? BBK opens UK doors

Yes Me Silver badge

No more OPPOs for me

OPPO - no opportunity to root your phone or even to install an alternative message app. Not a good buy.

Slow and steady for Cisco: Yep, people still need network gear, and together they'll pay billions of bucks for it

Yes Me Silver badge

Re: Not exactly impaired by all the anti Huawei activity..

Not mind it? Who the hell do you think is lobbying against Huawei in Washington?

Cisco must be delighted that their lobbyists have done such an awesome job - they've got the whole US government waging economic warfare for them.

Uncle Sam to its friends around the world: You can buy technology the easy way, or the Huawei

Yes Me Silver badge

Let's not beat around the bush

This is unfair competition raised to the level of governmental bullying -- wait, no, it's actual economic warfare. We all know the "security" arguments are completely bogus, and the allegations of intellectual property theft are no worse than what US companies are regularly alleged to do, and the sanctions-evasion allegations are unproven and unlikely to be proven. What's really going on is that Cisco and friends have spent enough lobbying dollars in Washington DC to get a number of rabid right-wingers up in arms.

Yes Me Silver badge

Re: Does that mean...

...NSA will avoid rooting us?

Nah, they'll just root you in the AU/NZ sense.

Not heard owt bad about Huawei, says EU Commish infosec bod

Yes Me Silver badge

Pompeo sticks his oar in

Mike Pompeo warned U.S. allies on Monday against deploying equipment from Chinese telecoms gear manufacturer Huawei on their soil, saying it would make it more difficult for Washington to "partner alongside them".[Reuters, today]
So let no-one pretend that the anti-Huawei campaign is non-political. It's a blatant attempt to distort free competition to protect US industry. "Partnering" with the USA looks less and less like a good idea these days.

It's OK, everyone – Congress's smart-cookie Republicans have the answer to America's net neutrality quandary

Yes Me Silver badge

I've always wondered...

... what about cases where paid prioritization is in the consumer's best interests?

Huawei pens open letter to UK Parliament: Spying? Nope, we've done nothing wrong

Yes Me Silver badge

The Bloomberg story...

...doesn't even have the whiff of a smoking gun. You get a sample of an alleged miracle product from a startup. Its claimed virtue is strength. You test it to destruction and therefore send it back broken, with a few slivers missing. What's the problem?

Our vulture listened to four hours of obtuse net neutrality legal blah-blah so you don't have to: Here's what's happening

Yes Me Silver badge

It can really be argued...

It can't really be argued that the function was somehow separately provided

Of course it can. Lawyers can argue anything. And in this case they're right. The DNS is replaceable; it's what we used to call a value added service. tells me how to find 2a03:2880:f119:8083:face:b00c:0:25de by name instead of by number. If the DNS vanished overnight and was replaced by the new Yes Me Directory service, we'd be fine (and I'd be rich, which is whole point of having a monopoly and exactly why the incumbents are on the FCC side in this lawsuit, and why ATT and the European PTTs were against the original deregulation efforts).

I'm all for network neutrality in a reasonable form, but actually the FCC is correct - it's a consumer protection and free competition matter, and it should be regulated under consumer protection and anti-trust rules. Not that that's good news for consumers in Trumpland.

Smaller tech firms just aren't ready for a no-deal Brexit, MPs told

Yes Me Silver badge

Re: Taking Back Control!

"The EU have admitted they will be enforcing a hard border. We done need nor seem to want to so thats the EU."

They didn't 'admit' anything (they are not in the dock, after all). They stated the obvious: when people or goods enter or leave the EU, that's crossing a border and of course checks will need to be applied, unless there is an international agreement in place. You don't just drive between France and Switzerland: you drive past a customs post in both countries. The agreements (including Schengen) are such that you probably won't be stopped if your car has EU or Swiss plates on. But there's a border. There is (and will be) such a border between France and the UK, with passport and visa checks because the UK is not in Schengen. Why would it be any different at the border between Ireland and the UK, after Brexit? Only because an agreement has been reached - an agreement which the House of Commons barfed over.

(And: Why isn't Ireland in Schengen? Because the UK isn't. If Ireland had joined Schengen, we'd already have passport and visa checks at the Ireland/Northern Ireland border.)

While US fires criminal charges at Huawei, UK tells legislators not to worry, everything's fine

Yes Me Silver badge

Re: @robpomeroy

The downvotes are because companies in every country commit industrial espionage. It's rather obvious that they're picking on a Chinese company for political reasons at this point in history.

Yes Me Silver badge

Re: Who's afraid of the big bad dragon

" the poor at the bottom of society commit more crime"

Actually that's true. For every Bernie Madoff there are thousands and thousands of poor people. Statistically they commit more crimes, unless you count the money, in which case Madoff committed 64.8 billion times more crime than each poor person who stole a dollar.

Fine, we'll do it the Huawei, says Uncle Sam: CFO charged with fraud, faces extradition to US over Iran trade claims

Yes Me Silver badge

Not unfair at all, and certainly not the result of lobbying by US companies

And of course, all American companies that ever did anything like the things they are alleging have been thoroughly punished.

(That was sarcasm, just to avoid misunderstandings.)

Senior UK.gov ministers asked: So, are we going to ban Huawei or what?

Yes Me Silver badge

Re: Another US Trade War In Disguise. Besides Who Would You Prefer Spying On You?

It's a different form of moral bereftness. China has an utterly different view of human rights than Western countries do. But in this matter, the West is setting out to be utterly hypocritical, by claiming the merits of free global competition while misusing the security services to protect home industry against a cheaper, better foreign competitor.

Apparently, free competition is OK as long as we're winning, but undesirable when we're losing. (As the UK will rediscover to its cost, if Brexit happens.)

Yes Me Silver badge

Re: The same elsewhere

> I suspect also that there is a very serious security side to it

Why, when after years of rumours not one single shred of evidence that Huawei products are more risky than, say, Cisco's or Ericsson's or Alcatel's has ever been offered? If anything, the evidence is the opposite, since the UK/Huawei testing lab has given Huawei a completely clean bill of health.

This is all about protectionism. Quite how the NSA and GCHQ have been suborned to support protectionism is an interesting question.

France wants in on the No Huawei Club while Canuck infosec bloke pretty insistent on ban

Yes Me Silver badge

Re: Huawei isn't any different than any other corporations.....

> uproar if a westerner company called it "getting rid of mediocre people".

Or in IBM's case "getting rid of older people". It would be refreshingly honest compared to today's mealy-mouthed PC PR language. Ever since "Personnel" was replaced by "Human Resources" the hypocrisy in employment-related "news" stories has been getting worse and worse.

Yes Me Silver badge

Re: Meanwhile

Most of the people who work for Huawei are also too young to remember Tiananmen Square. That is startlingly irrelevant as to whether a successful employee-owned company sells products that have security defects or undocumented backdoors. Until technical evidence is produced, nobody has any grounds to join the witch hunt. (Unless they're lobbying for companies that Huawei undersells, of course.)

That's technical evidence, not gossip or speculation that could be traced to any individual.

If there was technical evidence, I'm pretty sure NSA or GCHQ would have published it by now.

Yes Me Silver badge

Re: Again....

"snooping on PowerPlants, Govt Institutions, Telcos etc is a whole other ball game"

Yes. Please show me the evidence that Huawei has done that, ever, anywhere, or that their products have undocumented weaknesses that would allow such things to pass undetected.

Of course, it's like any witch hunt, it started without the slightest evidence of anything. Except that they were outselling Cisco.

Oxford University reportedly turns off its Huawei money tap

Yes Me Silver badge

Re: Very slick

I don't see any misdirection. If there are backdoors in Huawei products, it's because many governments want them, and telcos have no choice about acquiring equipment with backdoors. And do people realise that "call home" features are pretty much standard practice in everything today?

This whole business was cooked up by lobbyists for Huawei's Western competitors, who are seriously worried about their market share collapsing in the face of better, cheaper equipment. Don't like the fact that China has learned how to compete? Then use underhand techniques against them, rather than making your own products better and cheaper.

Yes Me Silver badge

Re: Put up or Shut up

" Nobody denies their link to Government "

You think? What is it, then? It's a privately owned company whose shareholders are its own employees. Some employees and the founder did military service. How is this different from many companies in Western countries?

We know what's going on here. Unlike most allegations of security issues in the industry, there is no published information even about what class of security issues are alleged, let alone any actual specific information that might help a user avoid or fix the alleged issues. So the only rational conclusion is that it's all fiction, invented for reasons of commercial protectionism.

It's very Trumpian in fact: a Chinese company is doing better than its Western competitors, so we'll use fake news and abuse of power to damage it. I suppose all this particular action proves is that Oxford University is still part of the British Establishment, and responds to blasts on the usual dog whistle.

Huawei’s elusive Mr Ren: We’re just a 'sesame seed' in a superpower spat

Yes Me Silver badge

Re: DOJ Joins #MyWakingGovernment Against Huawei IP Theft

As others have said, it's entirely possible that Huawei has borrowed technology. Well, Cisco used some pretty intensive techniques to squash their early competitors, not to mention allegedly ripping off their alma mater:

In 1985, Bosack and Stanford employee Kirk Lougheed began a project to formally network Stanford's campus.[7] They adapted Yeager's software into what became the foundation for Cisco IOS, despite Yeager's claims that he had been denied permission to sell the Blue Box commercially. On July 11, 1986, Bosack and Lougheed were forced to resign from Stanford and the university contemplated filing criminal complaints against Cisco and its founders for the theft of its software, hardware designs and other intellectual properties. [Wikipedia]
So could you kindly get off your high horse, Mr Creativity Technologist?

Huawei's horror show 2019 continues as Taiwanese research institute joins banhammer club

Yes Me Silver badge

Re: Accusations

You're wrong, if you're referring to insecure products when you say "wrong-doing". There is no evidence whatever in the public domain that Huawei products have intrinsic security issues of the kind that justifies banning them. And if there was any evidence, don't you think they'd publish it in a flash? This and the other bans are just the result of politics and lobbying in support of unfair competition.

Whether the sanctions-breaking allegations are true is as yet unclear, and nothing to do with product security.

Huawei's 5G security scrutiny pain could be Cisco's gain – analysts

Yes Me Silver badge

Re: Huawei's 5G security scrutiny pain could be Cisco's gain – analysts

wasn't that - as part of an all-out US technological war on China - the very point?

Of course, that is why the witch hunt started and why they are now rootling around looking for shell companies over the Iran allegations - not that they bother looking for shell companies when US kit turns up where it shouldn't. (Iran Contra, anybody?)

I'm just not sure the computer works here – the energy is all wrong

Yes Me Silver badge

There is a current one with Laptops turning themselves off or going in to standby.

And there was me thinking this was just standard Windoze 10 behaviour.

Yes Me Silver badge

Re: Mythbusters

Not just the FCC. Cell phone operators the world over hate the idea of a batch of 100+ mobile phones moving at 1000km/hr, with a weak signal to boot. The impact on the base stations being overflown would be horrendous.

I think that airliners have been pretty safe against RFI since at least the 777 came out.

On the other hand, I'd feel happier if airport security checked that each mobile phone really was a mobile phone, just like they used to check if your laptop really was a laptop by making you boot it up.

Yes Me Silver badge

Re: Similar story

My car used to conk out on very cold days when driving past the airport on the way to work. Cue paranoid thoughts about radar screwing up the electronics. (It was the first car I'd had with even an elementary on-board computer.) In the end it turned out to be a faulty temperature sensor that just happened to warm up enough to trigger the fault condition at that distance from home. It was surprisingly consistent, within a few hundred metres.

Another greybeard has left us: Packet pioneer Larry Roberts dies at 81

Yes Me Silver badge


the UK Experimental Packet Switched Network (EPSS)

That was a primitive first cut at X.25. You can argue that it derived from Davies' work at NPL, and in no way from the US efforts.

Heard the one where the boss calls in an Oracle consultant who couldn't fix the database?

Yes Me Silver badge

Re: RE: Getting one over on the boss

Yes. This is mainly why IPv6 has proved hard to deploy despite working better than IPv4...

Could you speak up a bit? I didn't catch your password

Yes Me Silver badge

Re: I'm pretty sure I can prove that...

I think you meant the mess of the pie.

Yes Me Silver badge

Re: I'm pretty sure I can prove that...

Well now you're getting deep into the metaphysics of randomness. Normally I wouldn't say this in public, but yes, IMNSHO there's a strong case for arguing that all apparent randomness including quantum randomness is just an extract from the digits of π. Why? Because when did you ever see an important equation in physics that didn't include π somewhere? Not that this will help anybody had up in an Oz court, of course.

Yes Me Silver badge

I'm pretty sure I can prove that...

π = 3

Because if an Australian service provider can decrypt traffic encrypted with keys that it doesn't possess, it can only mean that pseudorandom numbers don't really exist, and since the continuing digits of π appear to be pseudo-random, they therefore don't really exist, so π must be an integer.

So Australian legislators are right up there with - in fact, considerably stupider than - the Indiana legislature in 1897.

'Year-long' delay to UK 5G if we spike Huawei deals, say telcos

Yes Me Silver badge

Re: Paranoia?

They do check but clearly if you're paranoid and/or prejudiced, no amount of checking will satisfy you. There has never been published even the slightest concrete evidence that Huawei kit is backdoored for the benefit of the Chinese authorities. The whole business is anti-competitive manouevering by lobbyists for their Western competitors, playing on Puzzle Palace paranoia and US Republican prejudice. Sadly the other 5 Eyes countries tend to toady up to the US.

Fortunately for Huawei, not all customers fall for the nonsense.

German cybersecurity chief: Anyone have any evidence of Huawei naughtiness?

Yes Me Silver badge

Re: Sooner or later people will have to choose. Systems no one can hack

"lawful intercept" - it's been a feature for listening in to voice/data communications since before I can remember (the 1970's for voice and maybe early 1990's for data?)

The 1970s? You're kidding. Phone tapping goes back to when the phone was invented, and the Brits were tapping international telegraph cables in the 19th century, and of course very famously during WW I. It's always been legal (because it wasn't illegal), even before those pesky warrants were necessary in some cases.

I believe Queen Elizabeth I used to have her enemies' mail intercepted, quite lawfully.

Brexit-dodging SCISYS Brits find Galileo joy in Dublin

Yes Me Silver badge

Re: != Brexit dodging

You were sold down the river long ago.

No, we simply chose to be part of the world economy, and to encourage direct foreign investment, which is essential when running a permanent trade deficit.

Brexit of course would make the need for such investment even greater. Hopefully that won't happen, if the House of Commons comes to its senses and rebels against the small fraction of the Tory party that is current dictating.

UK Supreme Court considers whether spy court should be immune to legal probes

Yes Me Silver badge

Re: Any chance

.01 is still a quite small *number

All the same, it's still cited, especially in the US, when equal treatment under the law is at issue.

Tech support discovers users who buy the 'sh*ttest PCs known to Man' struggle with basics

Yes Me Silver badge

Re: The right attitude

as you probably know, Windows does not register a double-click when you move the mouse between the two clicks.

No, I didn't, and I've been clicking on Windows windows for an embarassingly large number of years. Thanks for the info.

But OTOH why the f*** would I move the mouse between the two clicks? I've never done that until you told me to (and you're right, it doesn't register).

Funnily enough, China fuming, senator cheering after Huawei CFO cuffed by Canadian cops at Uncle Sam's request

Yes Me Silver badge

extradition not needed

There are plenty of Huawei and Futurewei employees in the US itself. This warrant is very much targetted on a senior executive related to the company founder, who was trusting enough to fly to Canada.

Yes Me Silver badge

human rights of the victim

Hypocrisy? Not sure. The Chinese concept of human rights is very different from the West's. In their logic, this comment may be entirely appropriate. Apart from anything else, as pointed out re the earlier story on this arrest, it's based on US claims of jurisdiction gone mad.

Let's hope the Canadian courts throw out the extradition warrant. If they show the same degree of independence that NZ courts have shown over Kim Dotcom, this could all take a while.

Huawei CFO poutine cuffs by Canadian cops after allegedly busting sanctions on Iran

Yes Me Silver badge

Re: Canadians as puppets

No, I don't see any similarity to the Assange case. In any case, the UK has a long history of extraditing people to the US on unreasonable charges. Canada, not so much.

Yes Me Silver badge

Re: Canadians as puppets

Ever heard about 'Five Eyes'?

More than somewhat. But what has that got to do with alleged Iran sanctions-breaking at a time when the US has just ditched a highly successful nuclear containment deal with Iran? Again, this is a massive political error by Canada.

Yes Me Silver badge

Re: Canadians as puppets

Canada is legally obliged to act on the request of the US

But there is always the option of acting very, very slowly and missing her at the airport. Wise countries do that when a warrant is obviously political.

Yes Me Silver badge

Canadians as puppets

I have no idea whether she's guilty of anything, but it's beyond stupid of the Canadians to play this game as American puppets. The whole anti-Huawei campaign seems to be commercially motivated - now that the Chinese have learnt to compete on both quality and price, let's find some other way to stop them!

Wow, what a lovely early Christmas present for Australians: A crypto-busting super-snoop law passes just in time

Yes Me Silver badge

Re: "Ship! Come back!"

Well, nothing in factual reality has changed since https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1984 so like all anti-crypto legislation, this will make the bad guys more cunning and the only victims will be the innocent or very incompetent bad guys.

Huawei gets the Kiwi 'yeah nah'* as NZ joins the Chinese kit-ban club

Yes Me Silver badge

Re: Huawei gets the Kiwi 'yeah nah'

Washington once again leans on a vassal

You obviously didn't read where the head of GCSB said that the decision wasn't the result of 5 Eyes pressure. We all believe him, of course. It was all his own staff's work, of course. He never hears from the NSA, of course. He's quite unaware of whatever goes on in Washington, London, Ottawa and Canberra, of course. (Particularly ignorant about London and Ottawa, in this case.)

Yes Me Silver badge

Re: 5 eyes can't see into Huawei?

Nokia Networks and Ericsson sell in the US, so they must include NSA-approved backdoors.

Yes Me Silver badge

Re: 5 eyes can't see into Huawei?

The "security" argument is supported by the following evidence: zilch. This is blatant toadying to the Americans plus the usual Kiwi thing of pretending to be independent but actually copying Australia. But it's not over yet and hopefully this will end up on a Ministerial desk in Wellington soon enough.

NASA's Mars probe InSight really has Mars in sight: It beams back first pic after touchdown

Yes Me Silver badge

Well done

This is the best news of the year. (Not that there's been much competition.)

Ethernet patent inventor given permission to question validity of his own patent

Yes Me Silver badge

Re: Two minds about this ?

Patenting the obvious is a career-enhancement in many big hi-tech companies; the world leader is IBM, not Cisco. The issue is that patent examiners are under pressure to shift paper off their desks as quickly as possibly, and granting a patent is much less bother than denying it, because then there'll be follow up and all kinds of botheration.

And BTW when you take a job with one of these companies, the small print in the terms and conditions that you sign specifies that anything you invent belong me. It isn't a matter of choice.

London flatmate (Julian Assange) sues landlord (government of Ecuador) in human rights spat

Yes Me Silver badge

Won't someone think of the cat?

I feel much more sorry for the cat than for JA. It seems he isn't willing to empty its litter tray. I'm sorry, but when a cat agrees to live with you, emptying the litter tray is part of the deal, and you can't delegate it.

On the third day of Windows Microsoft gave to me: A file-munching run of DELTREE

Yes Me Silver badge

Re: This is affecting the enthusiasts ...

"... if your Windows 10 is running half decently, you should never change its software."

It would be lovely if that was allowed.

IBM won't grow, says analyst firm while eyeing flatlining share price

Yes Me Silver badge

...developing countries

"there must be potential to sell their systems in developing countries"

Nah. Their price point is way too high. If I was packaging for a developing country, I'd start with a Pi and open source code, and work down. IBM doesn't have that in its genes.

IBM's problem for 25 years has been too low revenue per employee. You can't fix that by applying more managers to the problem. IBM's main business skill for 10 years has been "resource actions."

All bad.


Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019