So what happens if the software providers simply don't bother to add the back door, and say we don't really care about the Australian market anyway.
626 posts • joined 21 Mar 2007
Wow, what a lovely early Christmas present for Australians: A crypto-busting super-snoop law passes just in time
Yeah that will work
Anybody remember Operation Ore back in 2002 that resulted in several suicides over accusations of child porn.
Turns out the child porn link was really a link to the US government mandated age checking via a porn hub
which used the ability to make a CC payment age verification.
The FBI 'expert' claimed it was a child porn link and so thousands of people ended up being prosecuted and placed on offenders registers.
"But it can't happen here" say those who shout "Won't somebody think of the children."
I owned a 128k Enterprise
Apart from the shit case, even shittier keyboard and the damn thing being slower than you could imagine it was great.
Oh except for the edge connectors for the monitor connection that meant most people blew up their Enterprises.
Oh and the overheating problem, I never knew a heatsink that go so hot until pentium processors turned up.
I would like to ask a question
To quote "But by making even one FireOS phone, the OEM would have lost the ability to include Google Play Store on its other devices."
Has anybody even seen the Play Store on any Amazon device, as I most certainly haven't, they don't use it as they want all the income for themselves.
So that's a bit of a non argument.
I'm not agreeing with googles business plan but lets at least avoid non existent examples being used.
Re: Where did you get that $20 padlock?
Just rap the lock (as it's phrased) and the pawls bounce open on masterlocks and similar, hence it is wise to use something which uses ball bearings to secure the hasp
Shimming tends to be irritating and sometimes they even make one that fits together proper properly.
For chinese built locks usually the locking mechanism isn't protected so a 'knife' can be shoved up through the key way and used to unlatch the catches.
Re: The same law for everyone ...
Obviously you haven't kept yourself up to date with how the computer misuse act is applied to the rest of the population.
People end up in a court room for accessing publicly accessible material, I know a couple of people who ended up in a courtroom for notifying hosting companies that there was publicly accessible documents/pages that looked like they should be private.
Few week later the cops arrive at their houses and employers, grab all hardware and media and make their lives hell for a couple of years.
If it was anybody else
If it was anybody else it the lack of training or anything else would have got the "but you accessed something that you shouldn't have" response.
Funny enough the majority of us seem to be required to be capable of speaking on the phone and working through documents at the same time
Re: Try watching UGC for a month.
To be honest I would rather lose Holywood and the endless inane crap that gets made these days (and that's ignoring the sequel to the sequel to the sequel of a poor remake) seems that any decent film that is made is in spite of the entertainment industry rather than because of it
I have seen two recent films in the last two years solely because I was entombed on a Dublin to San Francisco flight and I am still unsure as to whether the films or the flight were the more mind numbing aspect of those 11 hours (I worked through their audio selection on the return flight and even then everything was 30+ years old) the rest of my film watching has consisted of about 5 pre 1970s 'classsics.'
About twice a month I will get around to watching a documentary and that's it, to be honest I would ditch TV altogether if it wasn't for the rest of the family, my news comes from the radio which doesn't suffer so much from the endless churn of 24 hour news stations.
The rest of the time I either do something or work through tutorials on YouTube (and similar) and some live streams, Iv'e even been known to play the odd video game one in a while.
So before dissing the good quality UGC that is out there, have a think about the pap that the entertainment industry tells you that you need to watch
The automated systems don't work
Anybody who follows any number of channels on YouTube will find the following
Automated DCMA claims for stolen material (which isn't stolen)
DCMA complaints from falsely claiming ownership of material
DCMA complaints when "fair use" applies
False claims of regarding ownership of background music tracks
The system doesn't work already so why would you introduce a system which is even worse?
Even if the fingerprinting did work properly, it would still be a minefield and would simply benefit those with the right lawyers.
No problem here (yet)
Haven't hand this issue on the Pixel I have and the issue hasn't raised it's head on the Nexus 5X either.
I did have an issue two consecutive months after security updates on the Nexus were it switched off Wi-Fi (for some reason)
Then again I caught those because I'm a data miser and have an alert set for mobile data usage (you do these things when ones beloved goes for a walks while listening to her favourite by streaming from YouTube)
Re: "a developer can see the problem of networking clearly ... especially if they know networking."
Available data seems to imply that deveropers know very little about developing (unless cut and paste from examples on the internet counts as development)
sadly I know of way too many 'network engineers' who do the same thing <sigh>
Considering the only times I have managed to speak to anybody who wasn't an idiot it was because I was put through to the Dundee office.
Considering the concept of efficient seems to involve an Indian team that have no ability whatsoever to resolve the issue while trying to sell you a more expensive option.
Virgin media have never provided an efficient service (either from a domestic or commercial user perspective) they have however provided services with poor backend systems and ever less able customer facing staff.
Penetrated by a camera?
I very much doubt it was the DJI glass filled nylon arms, the motor or the flight controller that did the damage.
In all likelihood it was the DSLR (or less likely the battery) that actually did the penetrating.
Therefore it should either be cameras or batteries that should be banned.
I also wonder it was a tractor battery or something that they used
Had the IRA got 36 counties the next target would have been the Irish government as they were essentially a Marxist organisation that would not have tolerated Irish governments of the time.
As has been shown they would not have given up the power and control of their communities or the lucrative "community worker" status
I had more difficulty not shouting at him to be honest, though according to other office denizens I was very close to failure.
That was noticed when I started suggesting that my current certifications actually may mean that I know a little about Wi-Fi <sigh>
Still it entertained everybody else.
their tech support claimed that you can't use the 5GHz channels unless you are using Apple devices as it is specifically for Apples use.
My new network kit arrived about 90 minutes later (10 days early) and surprisingly enough within an hour of arriving home my VM router was in modem mode and Meraki kit has been doing everything else.
So the prospect of IP V6 arriving doesn't really strike me as something that is likely to arrive until somebody actually forces them (and then their 'tech support' staff will deny it's existence unless you are using Apple devices.
Re: @Cynic_999 - being seen from the air while naked
Have added the quote
"That said, drone enthusiasts can prevent a lot of irritation and upset if they respect other people's privacy. There is plenty of room to avoid problems, and even where it cannot be avoided a polite knock on the door and a quick, friendly chat goes a very long way to avoid misunderstandings and unpleasantness."
Actually 'drone pilots' shouldn't have to do that, for the simple reason that they should not be flying that close to people and structures. There are regulations that flyers are obliged to adhere to.
Although I do get irritated with the scare stories I have never had any compunction to tell people to stop flying somewhere inappropriate or in the past report them to the cops (flying model plains at the end of a commercial runway) or posting horrendously dangerous content to youtube (when the CAA used to want such material reported)
The majority of flyers are the same as they are responsible people who do not wish to lose their hobby due to the actions of a selfish few
Re: @Cynic_999 - being seen from the air while naked
So what you are pointing at are modified cameras that permit updated lenses.
In the case of DJI you are flying through the same camera as used for photographic purposes and for the most part these days they are DJI specific items
Additionally so that isn't going to go too well as you need a wide FOV to fly the damn thing and there is no method of changing the 'zoom' when in flight.
For most consumer kit the weight of any useful long range lens (even these days) will limit it's usefulness and by the time a suitable gimble (as it would need to be a good one that copes with more than an ultra light action cam) the weight and therefore the machines size goes up again.
I have a lightweight gimble for a small DSLR & associated lens that I am repairing (for a commercial pilot) and I could assure you no DJI available in an electronics store would be lifting it off the ground even without a camera in place.
Re: @Cynic_999 - being seen from the air while naked
Somehow I don't think anybody will be spending a few grand on building a large machine to hoist a camera with a large lens into the air to photograph you in your house.
You do realise that any commonly available machine doesn't have much more than a go-pro on board, even the nice DJI cameras are fairly high quality but still have action cam type optics.
The behemoths that carry the kit for what you are referring to are large, loud and expensive (I know enough licensed commercial operators)
But then again who is worried about reality when you can simply invent deviants to rail against
Re: Please tell me you don't believe in the voyeur/pedophile/pervert and a drone crap.
What are you talking about, are you making up statements I have not made?
What is the problem with me flying my radio control aircraft around an area where the flying of model aircraft is permitted?
What is the problem with proximity flying within abandoned buildings?
There is none, but for some reason you have decided to classify me as a moron, I'm afraid that you really need to educate yourself and on more than the matter of flying radio control models (because that's what they are)
Re: Where are the Drone Jammers then?
I take it from your comment that your experience of multi rotors and the cameras they can lift is non existent.
FYI they're noisy, very obvious and the cameras they carry are very limited unless you are going to spend a hell of a lot of money to hoist a DSLR into the air.
Remember when mobile phones with cameras where banned for the same reasons.
So how does the phone detect if it's the driver or a passenger using the phone.
I would not be overly happy if I couldn't use my phone on a bus, train, tram or while a passenger in a car.
I understand the family's anguish, anger and the desire to make anybody even vaguely connected with the accident responsible and I'm sure that my anger and distress would cause me to to try and do something.
However I do see this as a lawyer steering them in the wrong direction (and more for his own benefit than the family)
Re: Bit miffed and surprised
In sport mode it can hit around 40 => 45 MPH though that probably isn't enough to stay in front of an aircraft and climb 150 metres at the same time.
Once again I will make the proviso that there are stupid people out there who do stupid things, but where are the events likely to occur, close to the ground and close to locations nobody should be flying anything larger than a piece of folded A4 paper.
Re: Heavy regulation
Wi-Fi isn't used (that's info coming from people who don't know what they're talking about, or who are talking about toys)
Output is limited to 100mW and in the case of the very common FrSky Taranis the absolute max range is about .9 of a mile on a standard setup and perhaps 2.7KM with the long range TX.
Further ranges can be gained by shifting down to 433MHz and going mad with antenna trackers.
I've never sent a machine out past 150 metres as a 450mm machine is difficult to see even with nice LEDs installed.
Personally I don't like FPV flying, but even then with a totally illegal 600mW 5.8GHz transmitter the range isn't massive. Those who want long range go down to 1.2 GHz (those require physically large antennas)
On the whole the people who are causing issues are idiots and who buy a ready made machine and fly somewhere stupid, usually through ignorance.
Re: Heavy regulation
If you are referring to me then I suggest you read what was actually written as opposed to making accusations.
There are issues, I have personally reported flyers to the cops on 3 occasions for flying in and around airports (and a couple of times in city centres) and will continue to do so, so watch where you point fingers.
However the altitudes (and speeds) quoted simply smell of piss for consumer (and even commercial) machines.I have no doubt that several such sightings in the US where very large turbine powered fixed wing machines (which everybody insists upon calling models, so that's OK)
I have watched the PSNI UAS flying within the Belfast City Airport approach path so maybe the police force mentioned where dicking about at the time with some monster machine they own.
As such sightings have been going on for donkeys years what where they called before multirotors became available?
There are issues but they aren't DJI Phantoms 2 miles up, they're in and around entirely inappropriate locations and probably much more dangerous.
Perhaps the Daily Mail have a job you may wish to apply for?