Well that's about all I have to add really
610 posts • joined 21 Mar 2007
Well that's about all I have to add really
Ans yet if nothing was done about the click fraud and security API use the same people would also complain
Maybe you should plug their toilet in and do the human race a favour
Haven't hand this issue on the Pixel I have and the issue hasn't raised it's head on the Nexus 5X either.
I did have an issue two consecutive months after security updates on the Nexus were it switched off Wi-Fi (for some reason)
Then again I caught those because I'm a data miser and have an alert set for mobile data usage (you do these things when ones beloved goes for a walks while listening to her favourite by streaming from YouTube)
Available data seems to imply that deveropers know very little about developing (unless cut and paste from examples on the internet counts as development)
sadly I know of way too many 'network engineers' who do the same thing <sigh>
Oh when will Google allow us to revoke permissions to apps.
I can't actually remember how long I have been able to do that, but it turned up in Android 6 (Marshmallow I think it was)
Maybe you need an OS update
Considering the only times I have managed to speak to anybody who wasn't an idiot it was because I was put through to the Dundee office.
Considering the concept of efficient seems to involve an Indian team that have no ability whatsoever to resolve the issue while trying to sell you a more expensive option.
Virgin media have never provided an efficient service (either from a domestic or commercial user perspective) they have however provided services with poor backend systems and ever less able customer facing staff.
I very much doubt it was the DJI glass filled nylon arms, the motor or the flight controller that did the damage.
In all likelihood it was the DSLR (or less likely the battery) that actually did the penetrating.
Therefore it should either be cameras or batteries that should be banned.
I also wonder it was a tractor battery or something that they used
So is it rude to ask how the Great Australian Firewall succeeded ?
Oh wait whats that it was useless wasn't it
Had the IRA got 36 counties the next target would have been the Irish government as they were essentially a Marxist organisation that would not have tolerated Irish governments of the time.
As has been shown they would not have given up the power and control of their communities or the lucrative "community worker" status
Actually they had a habit of giving warnings that were crafted to move people closer to other other bombs which they neglected to mention to anybody
Funny how Britain always becomes England isn't it
Quick break out the flags
I was on board with the whole thing then I saw Eclipse
Oh well that's something else that isn't going to work
You mean they have sold the airspace
Well it's not as if the recording companies ever get around to paying the artists who do the actual work.
I've come to the stage were most of the artists I like have ended up running their own companies so I buy from them now.
"Connect app and while it's certainly very grabby on data – you need to have both GPS and Bluetooth turned on to use it"
While I do not see the need for the GPS I do have some sympathy for wanting the Bluetooth to be enabled what with them requiring the Bluetooth for Yer actual connectivity.
I had more difficulty not shouting at him to be honest, though according to other office denizens I was very close to failure.
That was noticed when I started suggesting that my current certifications actually may mean that I know a little about Wi-Fi <sigh>
Still it entertained everybody else.
their tech support claimed that you can't use the 5GHz channels unless you are using Apple devices as it is specifically for Apples use.
My new network kit arrived about 90 minutes later (10 days early) and surprisingly enough within an hour of arriving home my VM router was in modem mode and Meraki kit has been doing everything else.
So the prospect of IP V6 arriving doesn't really strike me as something that is likely to arrive until somebody actually forces them (and then their 'tech support' staff will deny it's existence unless you are using Apple devices.
Oh look a Daily Mail April fool
Have added the quote
"That said, drone enthusiasts can prevent a lot of irritation and upset if they respect other people's privacy. There is plenty of room to avoid problems, and even where it cannot be avoided a polite knock on the door and a quick, friendly chat goes a very long way to avoid misunderstandings and unpleasantness."
Actually 'drone pilots' shouldn't have to do that, for the simple reason that they should not be flying that close to people and structures. There are regulations that flyers are obliged to adhere to.
Although I do get irritated with the scare stories I have never had any compunction to tell people to stop flying somewhere inappropriate or in the past report them to the cops (flying model plains at the end of a commercial runway) or posting horrendously dangerous content to youtube (when the CAA used to want such material reported)
The majority of flyers are the same as they are responsible people who do not wish to lose their hobby due to the actions of a selfish few
So what you are pointing at are modified cameras that permit updated lenses.
In the case of DJI you are flying through the same camera as used for photographic purposes and for the most part these days they are DJI specific items
Additionally so that isn't going to go too well as you need a wide FOV to fly the damn thing and there is no method of changing the 'zoom' when in flight.
For most consumer kit the weight of any useful long range lens (even these days) will limit it's usefulness and by the time a suitable gimble (as it would need to be a good one that copes with more than an ultra light action cam) the weight and therefore the machines size goes up again.
I have a lightweight gimble for a small DSLR & associated lens that I am repairing (for a commercial pilot) and I could assure you no DJI available in an electronics store would be lifting it off the ground even without a camera in place.
Somehow I don't think anybody will be spending a few grand on building a large machine to hoist a camera with a large lens into the air to photograph you in your house.
You do realise that any commonly available machine doesn't have much more than a go-pro on board, even the nice DJI cameras are fairly high quality but still have action cam type optics.
The behemoths that carry the kit for what you are referring to are large, loud and expensive (I know enough licensed commercial operators)
But then again who is worried about reality when you can simply invent deviants to rail against
What are you talking about, are you making up statements I have not made?
What is the problem with me flying my radio control aircraft around an area where the flying of model aircraft is permitted?
What is the problem with proximity flying within abandoned buildings?
There is none, but for some reason you have decided to classify me as a moron, I'm afraid that you really need to educate yourself and on more than the matter of flying radio control models (because that's what they are)
I take it from your comment that your experience of multi rotors and the cameras they can lift is non existent.
FYI they're noisy, very obvious and the cameras they carry are very limited unless you are going to spend a hell of a lot of money to hoist a DSLR into the air.
Remember when mobile phones with cameras where banned for the same reasons.
Please tell me you don't believe in the voyeur/pedophile/pervert and a drone crap.
I mean really please return my faith in the IQ of people
Oh look a method of taking money of people.
I'm rather confused how my 130mm racer will carry any transceivers for identification, also wondering how my 150mm racer will manage to carry anything apart from the minimal configuration it already has.
So how does the phone detect if it's the driver or a passenger using the phone.
I would not be overly happy if I couldn't use my phone on a bus, train, tram or while a passenger in a car.
I understand the family's anguish, anger and the desire to make anybody even vaguely connected with the accident responsible and I'm sure that my anger and distress would cause me to to try and do something.
However I do see this as a lawyer steering them in the wrong direction (and more for his own benefit than the family)
In the UK they would already know and based upon diameter you may end up on a watch list
Not that Talk Talk are being crap, I'm simply surprised that so many Talk Talk users had an internet connection good enough to even get infected
Such issues are easily fixed by making such calls chargeable.
If the contract didn't cover such calls being chargeable then the people involved in the bid should be sacked
Nurse Ratchett his meds are wearing off, swat him with his Daily Mail
In sport mode it can hit around 40 => 45 MPH though that probably isn't enough to stay in front of an aircraft and climb 150 metres at the same time.
Once again I will make the proviso that there are stupid people out there who do stupid things, but where are the events likely to occur, close to the ground and close to locations nobody should be flying anything larger than a piece of folded A4 paper.
Wi-Fi isn't used (that's info coming from people who don't know what they're talking about, or who are talking about toys)
Output is limited to 100mW and in the case of the very common FrSky Taranis the absolute max range is about .9 of a mile on a standard setup and perhaps 2.7KM with the long range TX.
Further ranges can be gained by shifting down to 433MHz and going mad with antenna trackers.
I've never sent a machine out past 150 metres as a 450mm machine is difficult to see even with nice LEDs installed.
Personally I don't like FPV flying, but even then with a totally illegal 600mW 5.8GHz transmitter the range isn't massive. Those who want long range go down to 1.2 GHz (those require physically large antennas)
On the whole the people who are causing issues are idiots and who buy a ready made machine and fly somewhere stupid, usually through ignorance.
If you are referring to me then I suggest you read what was actually written as opposed to making accusations.
There are issues, I have personally reported flyers to the cops on 3 occasions for flying in and around airports (and a couple of times in city centres) and will continue to do so, so watch where you point fingers.
However the altitudes (and speeds) quoted simply smell of piss for consumer (and even commercial) machines.I have no doubt that several such sightings in the US where very large turbine powered fixed wing machines (which everybody insists upon calling models, so that's OK)
I have watched the PSNI UAS flying within the Belfast City Airport approach path so maybe the police force mentioned where dicking about at the time with some monster machine they own.
As such sightings have been going on for donkeys years what where they called before multirotors became available?
There are issues but they aren't DJI Phantoms 2 miles up, they're in and around entirely inappropriate locations and probably much more dangerous.
Perhaps the Daily Mail have a job you may wish to apply for?
Firstly you are presuming this ever actually happened.
Frankly the technology simply can't do what is claimed in this 'article' (by article I'm wondering if a pair of tongs, bleach and a boil wash would be appropriate for the offending item)
At best it would point to military kit if the claims are to be believed. In times past when such claims where made pilots where breathalyzed, maybe they should start that procedure again
Secondly you are presuming you have a clue regarding what you are commenting upon
4000 feet at 200 knots, I think not
Flying around the nose of an A340 at 9000 feet yeah right, what speed and altitude do they think these things fly at exactly?
Full out racing machines are lucky to get much over 60mph and are lucky to reach 4.5 minutes flight time
What! you worked for Fujitsu 3 times ;)
Sorry I will ignore the reference (if you had any confidence in your humour you wouldn't have hidden anyway)
He fucked his own life up
Ever had to look after somebody who has only had a couple of kicks in the head, no I thought not.
Land somebody on the ground then kick them in the head is a damn good reason for somebody to go to prison.
BTW: FoboFool should actually be RoboFool
Also although the machine that crashed yesterday didn't have autopilot (it seems) none the less it's the autopilot facility that is the reason much more attention will be paid to any incidents with the Tesla product line.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence and considering the the meatbags are pretty poor at driving I consider claims of safe computer controlled driving pretty damned extraordinary
From memory a Lithium fire will strip the oxygen from the carbon, that's why water doesn't work so well either
Ever experienced a LiPo fire even a small one?
They can do anything from sit and lurk, bend, attempt to swell, emit smoke and steam, burn (nice and hot) with lots of smoke and pretty colours, or simply detonate as they see fit.
Also you don't know how many batteries are left inside the machine.
As for clickbait, well for the most part other cars aren't performance cars and can have "FoboFool" driving while the fleshy idiot is watching a film on his iPad (or whatever they do)
The vast majority of multorotors don't have any GPS capability.
The vast majority of fixed wing and helicopter models also don't have GPS either
Is the story a bigger load of crap than the comments being posted (I'm not sure)
No doubt this won't be approved, but look at the statements made before unwrapping the pitchforks and lighting the torches
The statements in the story smell of wee and I'm surprised that Saturdays episode of Causality wasn't mentioned as additional evidence.
Firstly there are idiots with ready to fly machines that's why the DJI Phantom is known as The Phantom Menace within the flying community but anything at 7000 feet wasn't one of them.
A twin bladed drone at 7000 feet, firstly that is called a helicopter or a plane in common parlance so No that's not something some moron bought in Maplin or online.
To me that smells one of the following : Commercial, Military or Police.
Commercial wouldn't risk their ability to make money and most commercial machines wouldn't stand a chance of getting that sort of altitude.
Military is possible, particularly if they probably forgot to set the home point and it was trying to fly back to the US or Israel (ask the Irish army about that one and the second one as well)
The Police are arrogant enough to fly anywhere they want and they have been spending a hell of a lot of money on UAV systems (see I know the lingo) but unlikely
5 years ago a pilot would have said UFO, a strangely common occurrence and probably made slightly less common by pilots being breathalyzed upon landing.
Any remotely operated vehicle is a drone (including your kids toy car) but as usual the Daily Fail would have you believe only drug smugglers, pedophiles, psychopaths and abortionists have such devil machines.but
As an aside one commenter who said model planes and helis require skill and multirotors don't, well tell you what try a 250 racer in acro mode and see what you make of it.
BTW stupidity is common everywhere I have had to call the cops about people flying both fixed wing models and kites less than 200 feet from the end of a UK airport, no doubt the story would have become satanic drone pilots as the other story would only have involved really stupid normal people
BTW a LiPo fire in your pocket, car or ear would be an unpleasant experience, however the energy carried and heat generated is probably a gnats fart compared with the untold millions of Jules and hundreds of degrees C the jet engine is producing.
No it wouldn't be good to bung anything into a jet engine, but a consumer grade machine is a plastic shell, (perhaps some glass bubble impregnated nylon), 4 small PCBs, a credit card sized computer, a few small motors and a soft(ish) battery pack.
Not a good thing to be ingested, but I would be a damn sight more worried about the damage a flock of geese or seagulls would do.
The 1% probably multirotor owners (no it's not a drone)
Anybody who runs Cleanflight, Betaflight or Baseflight or wants to flash SimonK speed controllers will be very irked
Dunno why the said Masterlock was OK as only takes 2 hammer blows to open their bluetooth padlock.
Actually it's fairly easy to break modern double glazing and it's quieter than regular glass, you just have to know how.
The purpose of any lock is to cause a thief to think it's too much bother, I will rob somebody else instead.
If the average thief knew how vulnerable many modern locks are then we would be in a considerably worse position.
Instead I have seen window frames pulled out, holes cut in the side of bungalows and caravans, snapped euro locks, slates lifted (and piled very neatly) from roofs, flat roofs cut through, melted uPVC frames and hundreds of broken windows.
Main entrance method though is the already open window or unlocked door.
Having switch to using a Nexus last year I am fairly happy with the update situation these days.
However I had an unlocked Samsung S4 and was getting almost monthly updates which cheered me up.
However those who are locked to carriers are pretty much doomed because carriers obstruct updates to keep their bloatware in place (don't tell me it's for network compatibility)
Samsung are not blameless for not so good updates but carriers should also be held to account
"For the Apple TV, this Fall"
No, simply no, only Americans (and Canadians who are Americans too as they have the same country code) call it Fall
Or did you mean "this Fail"
While attempting to ban decent padlocks
Oh well now I know what those 5 entries in the SSIDs logs are, I'm was surprised that there are so many Mitsubishi WiFi access points roaming past my house
Along with the Skoda, Vauxhall, Ford, Porche, Audi, Mercedes and BMW.
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2018