Re: Mobile Phone is an App in the phone...
And what markup will Apple or Google put.
Which Operators will they permit you to use?
Be careful what you wish for.
7377 posts • joined 23 Nov 2007
And what markup will Apple or Google put.
Which Operators will they permit you to use?
Be careful what you wish for.
No, they do.
Device vendors want to do away with physical SIMs so that they, not operators are in control. The Network operator and Device maker then do deals. Less control to consumer.
Have you LOOKED at a SIM, never mind the pointless new smaller ones (that we don't really need anyway).
BATTERY dwarfs everything else.
It's not about saving space, that's merely spin to justify user loss of control. Unless the device is locked to a network, the operator has no control with physical SIM, user can change it and many governments have demanded users should be able to unlock.
The virtual SIM is all about giving a partnership of a Network Operator and Device maker control and the user less control.
I love those liquorice chews and the big Galway row boats too.
1) Insulation and Double glazing: House still fairly warm after being out all day.
2) Timers?: How erratic is you coming home time? it's not much waste to have the heat come on early a with a thermostat regulating it.
I have only a multi-fuel stove, Google's invasive nest isn't much use for that.
We don't need any of these Organisations. So called IoT is been around as long as the Internet, before even websites.
We have plenty of good standards.Cue XKCD (Ah I see it's been mentioned). New ones simply mean gadgets won't play nice with printers, PCs, phones, tablets and Routers.
What we need is enforcement of approved 3rd party CE / FCC testing, in market policing and compliance with basic Privacy and Security standards. But that would remove the major revenue stream Megacorps are drooling about. They'll practically give away this junk if it needs a service contract or subscription, or exploits you for advertisers and revenue.
That Linux Mint is popular
They also could remove fingertips if the cover interlock was defeated. We had ours in a sound proof cabinet (it wasn't) in a store room.
The really fast ones employed a person full time adding fresh boxes of wide fan fold.
P.S. My E65 phone could print via the WiFi, but only if your printer perfectly emulated a particular HP Laser family.
I have a nice colour duplex laser, but I print any LARGE documents to mobi/epub format and read on a Kindle or Kobo, more like paper than an LCD / CRT / AMOLED etc.
1000BASE-T uses all four pairs bi-directionally and the standard includes auto MDI-X; however, implementation is optional. With the way that 1000BASE-T implements signaling, how the cable is wired is immaterial in actual usage.
It does for common Gigabit, but not for 100Mbps.
The reason is that it's easier to do the cancellation for up to 100m than get twice as fast signalling over Cat5e.
In practice this is really really hard the longer the cable, the more variable the cable quality is, connectors and the wider the bandwidth.
Speech on copper pair uses cancellation and there is significant crosstalk. Gigabit ethernet uses this technique and as a result needs much better cable and connections than 100M bps, as well as strict distance limits. it uses all four pairs in parallel, in duplex, versus original cat5 Ethernet which actually only used one separate pair in each direction.
I imagine only part of the 110MHz to 862MHz band will be used and often only on cable that is good quality (no nips, sharp bends, corrosion, poor connections and accurate impedance). At the minute 5MHz to 65 MHz (or sometimes 88 or even 110MHz) is used for upstream which is lower QAM and and TDMA. That's 0.8, 1.6, 3.2, or 6.4MHz channels with virtual TDMA channels in them. Downstream is 2, 4, 6 or 8MHz channels between 110MHz and 560 (old cable), 862MHz or even up to 1200MHz, essentially using DVB-C, but multiplexed data rather than TV.
The problem also is that downstream is really One to Many broadcast (though modems ignore data for other users) and upstream is Many to One, with potentially only 10 simultaneous users if you dedicate a physical channel rather than TDMA. Non-HFC is very much longer cables shared to more users. Hence the typical 8:1 or worse ratio Download/Upload with DOCSIS, though DSL is often worse. Also the QAM is typically lower to reduce modem TX power, this means lower speed. The symmetrical idea would mean very much higher modem power.
A simpler solution on cables not passing too many houses is to use 5 to 500 MHz upstream and 550MHz to 1200MHz downstream. Much more robust than full duplex on the same channels.
NT4.0 32bit Enterprise could use (via PAE) more than 4G
32 bit XP can only use 2.5G application, 4G (minus graphics hole) entire OS. Same with 32bit Vista
I've not tried a recent 32bit Linux on a PAE based Mobo, but certainly on a 64bit mobo, 32bit linux isn't limited to 4G.
Note that address space isn't usually the same as Word size on almost any CPU anyway and unless you NEED a 64bit OS, it might be less compatible with widest range of drivers and do some few things slower than 32bit OS, as well as actually use a bit more ram.
Most 64 bit CPUs do not have 64 bit physical addressing
Most mobos don't even accomodate as much RAM as the CPU can physically control (via PAE or MMU or whatever physical address bus there is.
On a suitable Mobo, with 64bit CPU, you can run a 64 bit VM on a 32bit Host OS too, though that's usually an afterthought, as starting with a 64bit OS might be better if you are wanting VMs too.
Strangely not all 64bit CPUs /Mobos support a 64 bit VM. I've an AMD that won't.
Linux seems to have better support for old hardware (Epson Scanner + PCMCIA 1460 SCSI or PC PCI 2940 SCSI just worked) compared to Win 10
Linux seems to now have good support for new hardware.
Putting Linux Mint + Mate Desktop on 12 year old XP laptop will work, or replacing Win7 or Win 8.x on a newer computer.
1G RAM and 32G CF card or HDD seems to be a reasonable minimum spec for Linux. Less RAM and HDD is usefully feasible for simply LibreOffice, Firefox, Thunderbird, Filezilla and The Gimp. Kindle Reader, Notepad++ and Digiguide work fine on WINE (1G or more RAM a good idea).
Unlike Windows, 8G ram is available even on a 32bit install on a 64 bit CPU.
Strangely Linux version of Skype works better than Windows version.
Linux Calibre works better than Windows version.
So compatibility of computers with Linux, IMO is now better than with Windows 10.
2002: I had 1600 x 1200 on my laptop. I'd like better than that.
P.S. It still works.
Why would you buy a new PC or Laptop to replace Win7 with Win10?
Surely you'd only buy a new PC or laptop if the old one was broken. Unless you are doing bleeding edge games, or rendering or decent Virtual Reality, you don't need to replace any DECENT PC made in last 10 years for better speed.
I'd like to buy a new laptop without an OS.
Also the rebuild time for a cheap NAS with Raid 5 is huge. With three disks this is more likely too, than with two disks by x 3/2 factor
I don't think the mobile time is NTP? Because dumb phones with no TCP/IP can have clock set by the Mobile Network Provider.
What if the phone company accidentally sets their server used to push mobile phone time?
If a Phone company messes up their Solaris / Unix / Linux server the automatic network time is 1st Jan 1970, cue ALL iPhones with vulnerable iOS falling over?
When eBay bought Skype the quality of SW went downhill.
MS. OTH totally made it unusable on many laptops (100% CPU. Why? Something to do with not being able to disable camera? I don't know.)
The UI has got worse. Ironically the Linux version is now better than Windows Desktop version, for a certain definition of better.
The adverts in a product that for years never had adverts, for a company the size of MS that makes so much from bought products is OBSCENE GREED and was doomed to server malware. It will again. That's why I have noscript in the browser, it's only incidental that it blocks adverts.
MS have totally lost the plot.
Ought to be illegal if it isn't?
Wasn't Readers Digest bought just for the database?
Was there some issue with Customer data of Radio Shack/Tandy being sold when it "died" purely for marketing.
Misuse of original data, IMO.
Runs Win 3.1 even if there is no x86
Loads win 3.1 in about 4s from network share.
We had some 386 PC for it back then. later upgraded to WFWG 3.11 with Win32s, VFW, 32 bit disk driver and MS 32 bit TCP/IP. Win 95 was basically that all rolled up with a new shell, First version Win95 had no USB and didn't have TCP/IP by default. The minimum level RAM Win 3.x and Win 9x specs were not enough to run Word (Office 4.3 later Office 95) and TCP/IP and a browser.
I copied the dying install disks of Word 2.0a to a "gold" style archive CD as i had lots of licences. I must try it on WINE.
They are just ASK/OOK slow speed physical links. Lowest level. You put whatever security you want on the TTL serial pins. It's trivial even with a PIC to have a CRC and 256 bit encryption, as the maximum data rate is probably about 1kbps to 10kbps at physical layer, certainly less than 50K. The TTL Serial data needs to be Manchester encoded as the links don't work well with a DC component. Trivial. Some receivers are optimised for Manchester encoding between 30kHz and 45kHz due to the AC band pass filter on the baseband of the receiver. They are really really cheap and easy to get CE approval as SRD. The USA band is at I think 385MHz rather than the European 433 MHz SRD allocation which is slap bang in middle of USA and Europe 70cm Amateur band. The EU 864 MHz SRD band can be less interference, it's wider, so supports up to about 1Mbps simple OOK/ASK or PSK and maybe 16Mbps very short range using QAM.
Bluetooth IS wireless, it's same 2.4GHz band. It can reduce speed of WiFI as the S/N is then worse for wifi.
Simplest is a 3.5mm stereo jack. Though Apple wants to abolish it so that they can charge more for earphones, even though there are stereo bluetooth earphones already. Bluetooth means re-encoding the audio, so in theory it's lower quality than a 3.5mm jack analogue connection.
It's true that the only advantages (especially for intermittent and low data rate gadgets) of Bluetooth over WiFi is the simple pairing (though often too simple with fixed 0000 code and poor security) and lower power (which means very short range, x10 range needs x100 power, that's physics, nothing to do with WiFi or Bluetooth or 3G or 4G etc).
We didn't really find them, they are not lost :)
Buying a small online one, that most people never heard of won't happen. They DID buy IMDB, Goodreads, The Book Depositary etc because that makes sense.
If their bricks and mortar Bookshops work and their own online Grocery works, then they might buy a bricks and mortar chain, or create one.
Impossible, because the human race is on average gullible. Loads of people in the family, friends, workmates etc using it.
Companies or media outlets you want to use are promoting it or using it.
Ignoring it is about as viable as using translation, video sharing, maps and search with Google. Is babelfish still running? Dailymotion instead of Youtube, Apple or MS instead of Google maps/Streetview/Earth, Er ... Bing/Yahboo instead of Google?
It's only slightly easier to ignore Twitter.
Idiots keep joining Linkedin and giving them all their email adresses. There ought to be a law against that and Whatsapp's slurping of addresses.
I predict 5G will mostly be about management, seamless bonding of data channels that use different bands and maybe even 3G and 4G at the same time. Possibly even on Edge. Better integration with WiFi too.
It won't be specifically about new spectrum (any generation can use any spectrum), or new air interfaces or any stuff like that.
Existing recent basestations will work, maybe with a minimum of new controllers.
Yes, they messed up their desktop product (search was only a part of it).
I can't see why any major phone maker would swap out the Google supported eco-system for Ubuntu. It's not as if the phone makers care about Google's dominance or creepy slurping of user's data!
No, they are doing this scheme to make money.
Facebook are a successful exploitive parasite encouraging people to be foolish and making money by exploiting them. The only difference with Twitter is it's not doing it well enough to make money. Google, even though Google Plus isn't doing well, is the most successful exploitive parasite due to their dominance on Search feeding dominance in Advertising.
None of these companies care about you, except as resource to be milked.
Free Basics has launched in over of the 30 of world’s poorest populations.
And it's not free nor the Internet. It's a malicious exploitation and curated walled garden of data.
I think the Indians are smart.
"Nobody could mistake the Basics walled garden experience for the full internet."
It's not even like AOL or WAP. It's tiny. It's promotion is grossly dishonest.
A fairer analogy would be The Raj's export of Indian Cotton to UK (or maybe just England) and Indians having to buy only British Cotton.
Facebook are only helping themselves.
Possibly worse than Facebook.
Free Basics is like a crappy Compuserve channel with the weather forecast thrown in.
No, it's not. Credit us with being at least as smart as the Indians.
Obviously the Indians are smart and know this is purely Advertising funded Facebook walled garden with Facebook deciding who else gets in. As such it would reduce the performance of paid access to rest of the Internet.
It's a far more insidious evil thing than breaching net neutrality.
Because Mobile Licences are much more revenue than TV allocations.
Actually it's driven by some national regulators, not the EU.
Ofcom and Comreg both have stated the aim of ENTIRELY abolishing Terrestrial TV. They are "captured" by Mobile interests.
Mobile is CELLULAR. Due to weak licence conditions to drive up licence auctions there are not enough base stations on existing bands.
This ONLY about raising revenue from Mobile Licences.
700MHz is too low a frequency for smaller cells. For more traffic and speed you need smaller cells, more base stations at the under used 1800 and 2100 bands. Even the 900MHz can have far more bases.
They are not even utilising the 800MHz they got from TV properly due to useless greedy regulators.
1) Such devices ran XP badly, they originally had Linux.
2) Win 10 costs money to replace XP and offers just spyware
3) Linux Mint with Mate works fine.
Why would you bother?
Though a star lasts rather longer than a Compost heap.
We hid it so the Aliens wouldn't know what we are like until after we sign the treaties.
Build Fission based power stations on same site. The Fusion waste neutrons then turn blanket made from Fission waste into safer radioactive waste, a process which can make additional electricity via steam heated in the "blanket".
Win - Win: Fusion efficiency increased and regular Nuclear power station waste made safer. This has been tested and boosts power generation even of current test fusion plant to net positive.
Anti-matter power generators are really inefficient but massively powerful batteries. You'll use more energy making the anti-matter, perhaps using fusion power. Probably in a automated facility in space well away from human habitation. Then a space-ship has to carry a tiny fraction of the mass for power, compared to a Fusion powered ship.
Storing anti-matter safely is an interesting problem.
Surely a misuse?
You talking Linux is your favourite OS? Because while OS X Server edition still exists (Only for Apple stuff), Apple stopped selling real Server Hardware and dropped "Computer" from their name. Also Apple's intention is that OS X should only run on Apple HW. Unlike BSD, Linux, Windows etc.
Apple is purely a Consumer Gadget company that still happens to make some laptops and workstations, a tiny part of their profits.
Maybe Apple stuff "just works" because it's a closed ecosystem? If I buy a TV, DVD player or MP3 player, compared to evil horrible Windows 10, they just work.
I last installed a Windows Server for WSUS to manage updates to XP workstations and Laptops. Since that requirement is now gone, we just use Linux for our servers, it just works.
No, it is NOT about safety or security. It's for exactly the same reason chips added to Inkjet cartridges and coffee pods.
It's about ensuring people buy a new iPhone or pay for overpriced Apple services and parts.
It's very depressing.
That's before anyone mentioned any motive of plastic vs negative Interest. I think the motivation though is partly all that cash (notes and coins) in our pockets is "doing nothing", but if it's in the system instead, then it can be lent out.
Unlike Mobile, payments at supermarkets etc, no-one dies if Netflix goes down. Unfortunately the way "bean counters" do stuff and how things work, Netflix is vulnerable to losing customers to boxed discs, Pay TV, YouTube etc, or people making their own amusements. Customers of banks, payment providers etc can't change so easily, thus bean counters don't care to spend extra to avoid a day or two downtime. They don't appreciate what will happen if no-one can make phone calls and no-one can pay for food to two days ...
1) Increasing software mono-culture. A patch on ANYTHING, even an AV update, might bork several different providers completely.
2) The local connection to the cloud.
What if we go cashless, all plastic cards and/or phones and banks, retailer's back offices and payment providers all outsource?
There would be food riots in maybe 24 hrs (c.f. Hurricane Katrina).
Most people will die.
What if infrastructure providers outsource to cloud? If the billing system is inaccessible, you'll not be able to use your mobile even if the Mobile Network is operational.
Electricity, gas, pumping water and sewerage.
This Cloud business has no silver lining.
It's only safe as backup systems to your own systems or for anything you can life without for a week, or collaboration on documents. If your business depends on it, some day you'll lose everything.
Maybe the girl might like to program a Minestorms bot?
This is all about Assange's Ego, not the USA.
The UN is regularly bonkers. Yes, it better having it than not. But anyone that thinks UN is unbiased, accurate, logical and rational is deluded. It's purely international politics.
Saudi Arabia on the UN Human Rights?
The Security Council a hangover from winners of WWII. Read about how the UN Security council approved the Korean War, The folks in Taiwan had the Chinese chair and the Russians were boycotting it. THEN McArthur refused to stop advancing and allow a DMZ at Chinese border, even though virtually ALL of Korean united. UN did nothing! Result, Chinese got more involved and Korean War ended up with original stupid border, which was actually a secret Russian / American agreement before the Japanese defeated in WWII.
MS Mistake 1
Putting Win95 style GUI on a PDA/Phone
MS Mistake 2
Inflicting Zune derived Phone GUI (pretty good for a phone vs Win CE!) on Desktop at 8.x
At the VERY LEAST THREE RADICALLY DIFFERENT GUIs:
1) Phone / small tablet
2) Large (10") Tablet, Laptop, Desk top. (if it can't 100% work without touch and 100% only with touch then two separate GUIs)
3) TV type interface, screen at least 1.2m / 4' away and only Sky style remote.
Servers and Embedded need a flexible array of interfaces with GUI option, low bandwidth text remote and ability to script/automate everything, depending on deployment. Embedded might be LCD text panel on a CNC tool, screen + keypad on ATM, cash register keyboard & multiple format screens, or whatever.
Touch screen cash registers and ATM are niche applications.
N0-ONE EVER is going to be able to make a GUI or an app framework suitable for desktop and phone. Phone suitable apps are like widgets on a laptop etc. A full feature productive application taking advantage of a desktop is IMPOSSIBLE to use on a sub 6" phone screen. MS and Ubuntu are moronic even to promote it. For YEARS we have been able to write a Java App for phone and desktop. You can make the SAME code work on both. But it's pointless. Proper desktop Java applications simply don't have enough screen on a phone and phone /PDA/Tablet centric applications on a desktop are either like tray widgets or poor cut down versions of real desktop applications.
Unity is madness. MS's thing formerly Metro Apps is POINTLESS on a desktop. They are both deluded.
I'm no Apple fan, but they did the right thing chopping up OS X to make iOS and sticking Fingerworks derived GUI on phone and mostly leaving desktop OS X GUI as it was (they have degraded OS X desktop usuability, but not for same reasons as bonkers Ubuntu Unity and MS Win 8.x).
Ubuntu was once the great hope for a desktop alternative to Mac OS X and Windows. But they lost the plot. TOTALLY!. Copied all the WORST GUI ideas of Vista and OS X. Why do you think so many people now recommending Mint + Mate Desktop (or even GTK or Cinammon)?
I've wondered are the same folks contributing to Firefox and Ubuntu / Gnome 3? They should read every Nielsen Group UX article of the last 15 years, use Apple OS 9, Risc OS, Win 98 and NT 4.0. Then repent!
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2018