I hope they continue to succeed.
6391 posts • joined 23 Nov 2007
I hope they continue to succeed.
No, it's not. It's x3 more expensive than a domain name, and my multiple domains already cost more than my hosting. It would make my total annual cost about 2.5x higher, just for the certificates. However I'd also need a far more expensive hosting package, something to do with issues of HTTPS and shared IPs? At any rate even if you have a cert, my hosting company charges a lot more.
No-one (other than me for updates) logs into my sites. They all are backed up. The SQL server access is only possible on the site, not remotely.
I use SFTP.
HTTPS is way too expensive unless you are making money from the site, or eCommerce. Even for selling, it's possible to use 3rd party payment such as PayPal where you get the customer details from PayPal later (using their HTTPS) and the customer never logs on to your own site, nor ever gives you card details.
This is to suit Gooogle.
"The national court will have to decide whether, when a consumer has been informed before the sale "that the model of computer is not marketed without pre-installed software and that he is therefore free to choose another model of computer, of another brand, with similar technical specifications and sold without software, the ability of that consumer to make an informed transactional decision was appreciably impaired," the CJEU said."
Laptops without pre-installed/supplied with operating systems are almost like Unicorns. From time to time Dell and a few others offer alternatives to Windows, not nothing. Generally speaking the ONLY retail alternative to Windows is overpriced hardware from Apple.
I hope there is some later appeal or clarification. While we are at it, the retailers and boxes have stopped listing the screen resolution, only giving screen diagonal.
Also no-one seems to supply media now to re-install the OS if the HDD fails or is replaced.
At least our new Social Media overlords don't sent us to Gulags, Vietnam War, Internment Camps, or "Work makes you free" slave factories.
Just examine our privates and spam us.
An insult to Ford.
"Will audio quality get better? By abolishing analogue there’s now a clearer digital path to your ear, and the phones get smaller."
Is that ironic, because BT or other digital connection adds re-encoding of the original digital content, which has to be unpacked. The "digital" earphones can easily have a lower quality decoder, DAC and audio amp than is possible on the phone motherboard. Re-encoding from one digital format to another ALWAYS reduces the quality unless it's a totally lossless format. You simply can't have the same quality and power level of analogue signal inside a wireless ear bud as 50 cents worth of electronics inside the phone. What part of the fact that Earphones and Loudspeakers need analogue* do people not understand?
YOU STILL HAVE TO HAVE ANALOGUE TO DRIVE THE EARPHONE COILS!
This is daft. The only advantage whatsoever of ditching an analogue jack is to Apple. You'd be lucky to have as as good quality and will have poor choice of earphones / headsets and have to spend money to connect it to a HiFi as an MP3 player.
The Apple justification of this is simply lies. It's a disgrace and a huge backward step. I'd bet if they could prevent 3rd party earphones working, they would. It's immoral.
[*A nasty trick of low power electronics is to use Pulse Width Modulation, variations of Class D, on/off to drive the moving coil of an earphone or speaker. Apart from the risk of radio interference, it's hard to get the distortion and resolution as good as decent DAC followed by filter and linear audio amp.]
10 of them?
Do they breed like aphids?
I'm still confused.
No, greed to suit Apple and sell "Beats" earphones.
How long does the battery of Apple's wireless earphone last per charge. How long till it wears out, how is it replaced?
I gave away an iPhone 5. I'm happy with my ancient Sony Xperia.
Like Tencent's QQ has had for years.
Plenty of more compatible to any boiler alternatives without "cloud creepiness" by established control equipment companies.
"So it made sense for big organisations to be given class A or B addresses. "
No, it never did. USA greed.
There must be 100s of millions of unused never mind wasted IPs in USA.
The Big UK & Irish Newspapers are sickening with their daily promotion of Game of thrones / Apple / Disney releases etc.
Apple most get more free sycophantic coverage than any other commercial operation on the planet, though this week a few papers mentioned that the Model 6 actually is poorer for phone calls than all other leading phones, especially in your left hand. No doubt they will make up for it with totally uncritical coverage of the iPhone 7.
Keep up the good work, Mr Vulture.
I thought that was for marooned kids on holiday, broke students and scammers.
Why on earth are Intel using them? They are very expensive too.
Sealed or not, there is really no fire risk on Lead Acid powered vehicles such as a traditional milk float. The sulphuric acid is dangerous but easily and quickly diluted with water. The biggest danger is the sheer mass of each battery pack.
Well, partly. Also the contents of lithium packs are more reactive than almost any other kind of cell and the outer package less robust because it's lighter. NiMH can achieve close to same order of Energy per unit volume, but is very much heavier and less reactive.
Lead Acid is very much heavier and once the sulphuric acid runs out they have no energy, in that sense the liquid types are "safer" than the gel types, which still can start a fire in a short circuit when ruptured. Sulphuric acid is bad on your skin and terrible in your eyes, but it's not very concentrated and easily diluted with water. Water can be really bad on ruptured lithium cells.
That's what those of us outside the pale call it.
So it makes sense I suppose.
Yes, it's mostly nonsense.
A saner lot than the nut cases, sociopaths and meglomaniacs in San José and Silicon Valley/California generally.
"Close Encounters of the Third Kind showed that more cerebral SciFi had a market"
Barely SF and certainly not cerebral. Just popular UFO tropes.
Oh come off it.
It was fun, but Science? No. Definitely not. Though far closer to SF than ST-TNG or Star Wars.
ST TNG was even less scientific.
USB *IS* the problem, and since it's inherent, it can't be fixed, only mitigated by a dialogue for yes / no and temporary / permanent for each "device" the USB dongle/mouse/keyboard/PSU/etc found/handed at show/bought/arrived as free sample etc. The automatic installation of USB devices has to stop.
The plastic printers, at least cheap ones, seem to be toys.
There was a BBC R4 prog yesterday (Mon 5th Sept 2016?) and basically 3D printing started 30 years ago. It still hyped the idea it would replace mass production and big corporates with small local businesses. Maybe for prototype and niche products, but I can't see it for mass market, where marketing and cost saving / speed etc of traditional stamping / forging / moulded / formed parts is always going to beat 3D printing. The Metal printing though increase range of niche low volume and maybe mould making?
Both are too expensive.
Maths, Algorithms and software ought to be FORBIDDEN from patents, and many aspects from copyright. This is not a new problem.
The patents for the Superhet Radio (RCA) and later FM should have been invalid. Just mathematics and the patent holders were not the the first people to implement them. The AM Superhetrodyne patent held back radio development for nearly 10 years because RCA was so big.
Edison also was a menace (read up on his Moving Pictures Protection racket. Eventually the US Government struck down some of the patents and forbade him from threatening other companies), very many of his patents were other people's ideas, stolen, or prior art and also should not have been allowed anyway.
NCC/Eveready Dry cell (1896?) was stolen Scandinavian tech, by a UK Chemist in New York, and shouldn't have been allowed as a patent anyway as it was only a obvious development of Volta's 1799 discovery, and being done by many people (a paste instead of liquid electrolyte so as to have a portable cell and thus carbon filament flashlights.)
Devlin sounds like she has some sort of agenda?
I thought they have been around for ages, though expensive and they can't walk. However, do they need to do more than lie down or sit up?
AI is a different story, but really that would be a disadvantage, even if it was possible. Simulated responses and actions are enough.
In the 1980s some PC used Lithium Thionyl Chloride batteries for the clock. I remember buying them in 1980s for parameter RAM for an Industrial Controller I was developing, no Flash memory then. The NiCd packs didn't have long enough life and also self discharge was 100s of times more than the static RAM standby current.
I wonder are they still made? Thionyl Chloride
One of the ingredients of super glue isn't much fun either. Methyl Isocyanate, I've noticed it lately as an ingredient and wondered. A spill of "Superglue" can set damp cotton on fire.
Even primary Lithium coin cells like CR2032 can be persuaded to explode / burn*. Batteries that are cycled many times or charged too quickly can get a build up of metallic Lithium, which burns nicely in water. I've wondered are the PP3 / E block/ 6F23 etc batteries made with lithium chemistry safe for appliances made to take layer cell or alkaline types, like how many toys are unsafe with NiMH or NiCd rechargeable because of their lower impedance means a short can cause a fire due to hot wire and plastic.
At least Lithium batteries aren't as bad as Chlorine Trifluride
So there are two aspects to any battery system, the cell contents and ability to supply enough current to use shorted wiring as a ignition source to plastic, paper, cloth etc.
[* Short out ONE AA NiMH to set the plastic of wire on fire. Short out a stack of 20 off CR2032 to see them self destruct. Obviously the 1.5mA to 2mA current limit quoted may be a safety limit rather than the limit of what can be supplied.]
If you are nearly immortal, as it takes about a million years for much of a change?
More a snapshot of a particular early stage?
Maybe the neighbours are all on WiFi and it's not near major road and you have near LOS and people in the area are using other providers. Just three people there streaming HD video will take it under 20Mbps. That's a meaningless report simply aiding the Mobile industry who are mis-selling Mobile as an alternate to real broadband and undercutting price by subsidising data with voice call charges.
You can have any speed you like ...
Just aggregate loads of 20MHz channels, when in the real world due to "competition" the channels are split between operators and rarely 20MHz. Cell concept needs a minimum of 3 channels per mast (120 degree sectors) and ideally 9 channels to stop the masts beyond the next one interfering.
Also up the QAM to infeasible levels only suitable for cable that needs perfect signals with no interference.
We were at the limits of bits per Hz spectrum for real world over 15 years ago.
This is NOTHING to do with 5G or Huawei kit, just a promo. The 5G is about integration of different infrastructures and to a secondary extend channel aggregation between bands.
There is no free lunch. No-one can repeal the laws of Thermodynamics, which is basis of Shannon-Nyquist law.
Really annoys me to see these nonsense press releases. Even if every lamp post was base station no-one is even going to see consistent 100Mbps, that would only be like universal WiFi. Note that even WiFi speeds are nonsense as they quoted for ONE connected user, perfect signal BOTH ways and no co-channel interference and MIMO in the CLIENT, not just base.
Don't even get me started on nonsenses such as "White Space" or "Spectrum Sharing",
A Smart TV almost was twice the price as a basic TV when I was buying yet it had less video connectors and the "smart" in any smart TV is not worth the extra compared to a cheap tablet / laptop / phone with along HDMI cable.
Actual real monitors are meant to be used perhaps 0.3m away and have much finer pitch pixels to be any use. Screens for TVs are used at a distance of 1.5m to 3m depending on size. TV screens to be most useful want to be 16:9 and 1920 x 1080 and more than 36" for a normal room. Monitor screens ought to be nearly twice the pixel density X and Y as a TV, even if the low for computers resolution of 1920 x1080, that's four times as many pixels per square inch, minimum, that's more expensive to make.
"Public" charging points
After market USB chargers of no-name in high street supermarkets etc.
The problem is USB HID and gadgets where you can't turn USB off on a port, or even worse, gadgets with "debug mode" enabled and then it's trivial to remotely root the gadget.
Micro USB was a wasted opportunity compared to mini-USB. So is USB C.
Actually the only thing worse than USB as a concept is Bluetooth.
I can think of many things that could have been done better at USB 1.0 time. However they were only thinking of joysticks, mice and keyboards, replacing 5 pin port and analogue joystick. No peer to peer communication, no User control of HID, not reversible and stupid limits even then for speed and power, should have had more options from day one, been reverse-able connector (easy) and switchable full / half duplex (four wires for data, double speed in half duplex mode for block read or block write)
The phone will have a SINGLE USB C connector and nothing else. Saves money.
You'll need a break out box to add power, audio to analogue amp, USB HDD etc.
Really the 2.5mm or 3.5mm power jack (properly made) makes more sense than USB, because USB can be exploited by Evil on a PSU and then you need a hub to connect anything else.
Ditching 3.5mm audio jack is so stupid. I'm not going to even list the multiple reasons.
A separate HDMI connector is no more a need for a "dongle" than USB C to HDMI!
My Sony Xperia lacks the coax power plug, but at least a €2 USB hub allows power + perpherials.
The separate HDMI and Audio jacks are good too.
It seems phones are being increasingly designed to suit Manufacturers and not users.
The IP6 wasn't designed for the real world, easy limiting / blocking traffic, privacy or security. Just to be big and fancy.
It's been fudged a bit regarding original MAC scheme, but it's flawed in so many ways. They need to think about it again, it's a stupid system given long term need of IP4 (many gadgets can't be updated or never will be). No important Website can turn off IP4 till almost no-one is using IP4, there are better ways of extending address space.
The world is a lot more than Servers and Corporate IT.
Even if my ISP supported it, many gadgets don't and it's a horror for anyone other than Network specialist to setup, I mean more so than IP firewall/NAT/Security Router & home WiFi, which is bad enough.
Well, Google would love that IoT (or more sensible WiFi gadgets that don't need Internet Cloud / 3rd Party) only uses IP6 as home users would NEVER figure how to block unwanted exploits from Security forces, criminals and Cloudy Exploitive Commercial companies.
I suppose if I don't look up I won't be spammed by aerial adverts.
When I'm World Emperor I will ban all adverts except in Retail and Trade directories. We have the Internet and Google / Amazon / eBay / Alibaba etc are already enough to find any product you want.
Random unsolicited adverts are so exploitive and Victorian. Ban Door to Door sales, spam email, mail fliers too.
Some manufacturers / retailers would save up to 15% .
Actually there should be NO competition at physical RF, everyone should be an MVNO as that would double or triple capacity, because spectrum is such a limited resource.
You'd need a MUCH better regulator than Ofcom with serious teeth.
Then make 100% Geographic coverage at a minimum data rate / voice quality at typical indoors downstairs.
It's not like making baked beans, handsets or cars in terms of competition.
Similar applies to Electric Grid (but not Generation), Gas network, water network, sewage network, fibre to home, letter delivery, rubbish collection etc as you only want to have ONE of these for efficiency.
By all means have as many retailers you like.
It needs seriously good regulation to work, which SHOULD have been put in place before BT was privatised. Ofcom is useless as they don't care about any interference unless it affects big licence fee commercial operators. They only care about a level playing field between big commercial operators, not critical infrastructure, protecting broadcast from SMPSUs, Electronic Ballasts and "power line" ethernet (really illegal transmitters). They do not care about the consumer.
FCC is pretty broken too or "Lightsquared Fiasco" would not have happened.
Comreg copies all Ofcom's and FCC's worst ideas and only exists to raise revenue.
All three want to abolish broadcast, Ofcom and Comreg bizarrely want to abolish FM and AM even though the spectrum is no use for anything else (DAB licences and DAB benefits National broadcasters and blocks out of area / out of state, so politics?).
Sounds like a typical and inevitable Cloud scenario?
Yes, years ago I made a slipstream disk for XP with SATA drivers, as the SATA drivers don't come on floppies (and you can't swap the CD / DVD). In the olden days the SCSI RAID controller drivers came on floppies, so you could add the driver at install.
If there are drivers that work on windows version < 10, someone will figure out how to install.
The ONLY value to windows for maybe the last 10 years is to be able to run ancient stuff without a copy of an ancient OS in a VM.
Windows is pointless without good backward compatibility.
Alpha 64 had first 64 bit Windows, NT 4.0!
Some stuff is actually LESS efficient on 64 only code.
"Windows 10 is your only supported option" != "Only Windows 10 version of windows works / compatible"
i.e. the only option MS will "support" is Windows 10.
Well, in nearly 20 years of doing Windows stuff, the only MS support was Technet or more expensive MSDN. Pretty poor after Server 2003, because, well, Ribbon, Aero, etc are stupid.
Migrated to Linux.
Any new hardware ongoing will be Linux, Android or BSD or something Chinese, certainly not Win 10.
The vision switching electronics in BBC used to overheat (1970s). The window mounted aircon fitted to help would ice up In warm weather. So back of 19" rack bay would be opened and a big fan sat on a stool to help cool it.
For a start you'd need peered fibre to their data centre.
Public Cloud? Nothing more than Remote transfer via internet to a third party server with no real assurance on privacy, security or reliability.
People would be mad to do this. I suppose some bean counter may insist on it as a "cost saving". If it saves money then the service is a "loss leader" or inadequate.
Only slightly better than copying all your data to /dev/nul
Consumer cloud backup sold by some retail companies has been a disaster already.
Another one for #Cloudfail
Much as it would be nice to detect Aliens, I did say this couldn't be them, though I didn't mention the passing mil-sat option.
An ordinary 3.5" 720K DS drive works fine on a PCW, and the 3" PCW drive on a PC (though you need utillity SW for the CP/M FS), it's a dumb adaptor cable is all that is needed. Also 37 way 8" floppies work on 3" or 3.5" drive cable with a dumb cable adaptor.
There was a HDD for the PCW, but that didn't use the floppy cable.
CF cards use the old Compact Memory card I/O, (ROMs, EPROMS and Static Battery RAMs), which also could support other peripherals eventually inc IDE as it's a subset of the old PCMCIA (a CF to PCMCIA can be just a pair of connectors and wire). CF cards support at least two storage modes, one of which is parallel IDE. A USB (USB stack needed) or SD (can be simple) based Flash storage is serial I/O.
I'm a little baffled as to why I'd want this, unless it exactly looks like a floppy drive in SOFTWARE, with no driver needed, to BIOS and DOS. Plenty of things used to plug into a floppy connector and NOT work without an OS driver (Zip Drives, Tape drives, MO drives etc), usually for Windows, rarely for DOS, sometimes only Win NT, or Win95 and later.
But does the BIOS and DOS see it as a floppy? Just because it uses a floppy interface and bay doesn't make that true.
Mine's the one with a 3.5" bay USB CF/SD/MMC/Firewire/USB €10 add on.
However does it benefit the user?
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2017