Do Cisco believe this guff or did an Agency write Fry's script?
7209 posts • joined 23 Nov 2007
Do Cisco believe this guff or did an Agency write Fry's script?
"Defeat could potentially allow an extension of copyright into previously undisputed areas, such as programming languages and APIs."
In reality these have ALWAYS been copyright, it's just that the originators have either not put any usage terms or placed the work in the Public domain.
Writing up a Computer language specification or API is no different to creating any other new written work.
Actually Zilog used different mnemonics for the common instructions of Z80 with 8080 and 8085 because indeed the 8080 & 8085 mnemonics are (c) Intel.
The reason for whole existence of BSD, GNU (before Linus wrote his Kernel) was in fact a copyright law war between Bell Labs (AT&T) and the Universities over UNIX ownership. Obviously Google has tried to sidestep Java ownership in a more clackhanded manner than GNU and BSD vs AT&T/Bell Labs.
GNU = Gnu is Not Unix
Mines the one with the Z80 handbook in the pocket
but what is the OEM price that they have to do this stupidity?
What about Blu Ray disk (BD) video playback?
What about Media Center [sic] MPEG2 for DTT & Satellite and MPEG4 H.264] for DTT USB sticks* and Satellite cards?
[* Some countries and UK after October 2012 use MPEG4 for SD not just HD]
This seems like shooting their toes off at the knee. A gift to OS 10 and Linux.
That it will open the pod bay doors for me
Erm.. the stuff they are replacing relies on their services and simply won't work at all soon.
What they are doing sounds reasonable.
There is no white space.
Rolled out Nationally this WILL cause problems but people will not know who to complain to or what about.
Coupled with the stupidity of Ofcom handing Interference complaints to BBC to process this is a disaster.
The company I worked for in 1989 had documented touch screen gesture editing & control probably in 1986..
Xerox in 1970s worked on this too!
my old Tech books and datasheets are not usable on regular size Kindle. I tried.
So need to save up for the bigger one,
Paid it to the Shareholders. Bought Meteor (mobile) because the previous asset strippers had sold Eircell (mobile) and trousered the cash.
Any small network improvements since privatisation have been paid for out of income,
Indeed HALF the Debt would give everyone in Ireland Fibre to the home.
Thus there is no point in "rescuing it" in sense of putting ANY outside money in. The Creditors (bond holders etc) were stupid enough to assist in the theft of assets and building the mountain of Debt. It's their problem.
Ireland needs to do a new system from scratch in parallel. You can't even pull out the copper and put in fibre as most of the ducts are wrong kind of pipe and the cable insulation "welds" to it.
I blame Maggie Thatcher, Ronald Reagan and Charlie Haughty as wel as of course the criminals that legged it with the loot.
Not a cent of the Debt was invested. All that debt has gone into the pockets of "owners". They can't be called investors as the spending on capital equipment has been negligible.
Leveraged Buyouts should be illegal for ANYTHING.
Asset stripping should need permission of the regulator.
Lifeboats? Hah. There is over 5 Billion in the pockets of former owners and asset strippers. The mystery is why STT bought it. (180Million). Presumably they thought they could seriously "hair cut" the bond holders as they did previously with buying Global Crossing in Ireland.
It's so bad in Ireland that BT practically gave Vodafone their Irish Retail Customer base. My 8Mbps fixed wireless is batter than 66% of Irish Broadband. If UPC wasn't running Cabel BB, my 8Mbps fixed wireless would be better than 95%.
Highest line rental in the World...
82 % had phone lines before privatisation
heading for 60% and 1/2 of those are entirely paid for by Social Welfare (people that don't realise that the Mobile is covered by scheme).
Mobile is horrendously more expensive to run than fixed line, yet a modest phone user can save 50% to 75% by ditching fixed line and only having mobile because of the €26 a month line Rental. Sky is cheaper!
No, not may,
They do. Everything created has copyright unless you put it in the public domain.
Ireland uses the UK Profile of MHEG5 for Saorview. No MHP. It does work too, on RTE1 & RTE2 and used to do screens on RTEjr <->RTE1+ timeshare.
ALL TVs with CI+ in all of Europe already do MHEG5
Saorview doesn't yet include MHEG-IC or HbbTV
The "biggest" interactive potential is "quizzes". But these only exist to get folk to use the premium number and raise cash. So unless there is a transparent micropayment, then HbbTV is a pointless "walled garden" as TVs and BluRay players add regular Internet Browsers.
The last time I was able to use PC parallel port and Serial Port for arbitrary I/O with ACCURATE timing was Modula-2 on a 286 or 386 booted in DOS (The M2 Program didn't use BIOS, but direct HW I/O for everything except file system and its own co-routine based Multitasking).
The PC parallel port (and newer PCs don't have Parallel or Serial) isn't useful on Windows or Linux unless you write a specific device driver.
Even then you need a real time version of Linux kernel to have accurate timing even at 1KHz i/o. Ordinary Linux distros and also the x86 are not predictable in timing.
A cheap Android tablet is about £70
But the problem with a Tablet or Laptop is controlling anything, Cheap USB I/O adaptors cost more than a Raspberry Pi and are REALLY slow... Maybe 100Hz sampling or Polling.
If the GPIO is sensibly available and able to do "bit bang" serial (not RS232, but arbitrary protocols and bits per i/o) in SW at 1kHz min (40KHz+ is better) then it's a winner. At the minute it's easier to do that on PIC 18F in JAL (with optional USB to PC) or Ardunio, but pretty much impossible on PC or Tablet on any OS such as Linux, Windows, OSX/
So, yes the GPIO, SDI, I2C etc support is the important bit. It's not just about programming. Plenty of routes to learn programming (Though your kids are better off doing NO ICT or Programming at School and concentrating on Physics, English, Maths, Chemistry and learning ICT & Programming off the Internet at home. No one has ever since 1980 and start of Computers in Schools properly trained the Teachers).
Mines the one with the I2C spec and GPIO register maps in the pocket.
" the best way to extend the reach of your network is to use powerline networking, "
You showing your ignorance. It's absolutely ALL users of affected spectrum, not just "Hams". It's only going to get worse too.
A really uninformed statement!
There are 13 channels, but even in Europe many gadgets will only use 11, also faster speeds use up about 1/3rd of the spectrum allowing only three base stations nearby. The highest speed devices use the entire 5.8 or 2.4GHz bands.
Or "So long, thanks for all the fish".
I don't believe there is a plan B. Nokia has as bright a future as Novell, SCO, Commodore, Kodak and Polariod
Nokia messed up around 2001 or 2002. They long ago passed the event horizon.
Demise of Crystal, destroying Trolltech/Qtopia, Maemo and Meego shows that.
Even if they had Early Adopted Android they would be on a nosedive today.
Why are some parts of science always looking for ET source for original Organic compounds? They had to start somewhere, so surely the most likely explanation is that the ones we have arose (by whatever mechanism) here. They seem to be anxious to have a "creation myth".
Also creatures don't "spring forth" from DNA. Unless you are one of those tiny creatures in the ocean or a Bacteria then Sex between Adults is required. Resulting in eggs or live birthed young.
So both papers seem as likely as Scientology.
If you think life "evolved" rather than "special creation", why not evolved here from scratch. Also if "life" can do it here, then probably "life" arises EVERYWHERE the conditions are suitable, which is likely not limited to our Terran environment. Or if they claim it came on an Meteor where did it start, or was it always somewhere since the Big Bang (Turtles all the way down).
Lets have some logic.
Spin Speed (RPM) 7200 RPM
Average latency 4.17ms
Random read seek time 11ms
I/O data transfer rate 300MB/s
Obviously if you are "recording" HD video and randomly opening documents.... 300MB/s is a peak.
"The iPhone is a beautiful product that revolutionised a whole industry."
No, it didn't. It's nicely done, but it used commodity parts apart from the OS and case. The change was coming anyway. I evaluated several prototype (easy to use) touch screen phones that ran Linux before iOS or Android appeared.
The earlier PDA Qtopia was optimised for stylus and resistive screen (win95 style WIMP) the later "Phone Edition" Qtopia was optimised for finger and capacitive screen use without stylus.
The reason for PDA and later phone stylus input on Resistive screen was the "holy grail" of handwriting recognition and sketches / annotation. Once the emphasis was on Browsing and mostly information consumption rather than creation using finger input and capacitive screens (both nearly 30 years old too) was more logical.
The ideal would of course be a combo screen that can do either stylus handwriting & sketches and finger gestures. Gesture based input is pre-1988 as I worked on a Mono-touch screen project then and the boss already had a list of gestures and what they should do (I think "filched" from Xerox, which before the mouse based interface was adopted had dabbled in "pen" based gesture computing.)
iPhone was successful marketing with a very slick gui. Nothing original. No special HW either. If there was any justice and honesty and proper evaluation of Prior Art the USPO would have only awarded patents to pre-iPhone companies and only for the GSM, CDMA, 3G aspects. Everything else in all mobile phones is prior art or just "style". No SW /GUI feature should get patents ever.
In two years time Linux based system(s) will be a fine replacement for my XP.
A tablet will be no problem. A suitable 1600 x1200 or better laptop will be harder to source than a decent OS.
They certainly don't need to run the same GUI or OS. You listening Mark Shuttleworth and Steve Balmer?
ALL decent tablets are over priced. Unless they start including a clip on keyboard, more storage and standard USB for Stick or HDD and SD card slot.
The ipad is too limited in storage options.
I'd love that on a 14" to 16" laptop. Or on 11.5" x 11.7" active area eBook so as to read US & European technical PDFs actual size.
I'd have thought that with 16M colours, and sub-pixel addressing that you only need 120dpi to 150dpi on any tablet.
The iPad3 is 9.7" so it's about 264 dpi which just a waste of power.
Un- Aliased B&W text needs to be 300dpi to 600dpi to look really sharp. 180dpi pure white or black looks jagged. But if you anti-alias then you can use 1/4 resolution, so 150dpi is nearly as good as 600dpi. Laser printers can't as they either put a dot or not. But eInk can do 16 shades (enough) and LCD/OLED about 256 shades.
So decently done 133dpi LCD can look like over 500dpi. Add subpixel addressing and you nearly double the effective quality.
264 dpi (the iPad3) needs nearly 4 times the TFT power as as 132dpi as it's four times as many dots.
Apple egotisim wining out over common sense.
Add visual acuity. Not all iPads are owned by teenagers. Over 80% of adults won't see improvement above 150dpi for anything shaded. Why do you think colour photo resolution on books and magazines is about 150dpi?
Then how many adults should be using "reading glasses" and are not:?
People seeing my 15" 1600 x1200 screen laptop are first:
Staggered by resolution.
can't believe it's over 10 years old.
It's 133.3dpi and yes, sub pixel addressing works to make text look clear and smooth (though the default settings are not the best, but you can manually "tune" it).
I'll buy a tablet when it's eInk and 8.5" x 11.7" active area at more than 120dpi.
Most of the cheap 7" androids are opposite extreme to iPad3 with having a useless 800 x 480 resolution. My 4.3" Archos is 800 x 480. 16:9. It's too chunky for portable and too small/low res for eBook or Internet sensibly.
I think a 3:1 format might work for a phone for scrolling pages 1440 x 480 Like LG Chocolate shape,
But 4:3 is better than 16:9 for a larger Tablet. Apple do have that correct, though for large "eReader" that would give 11.7 x 8.775 (US letter size needs 8.5" and Eu A4 needs 11.67")
"Why DO they do it as image per page? "
The Archos 605 WiFi had similar problem.
PDF far too slow and awkard
You needed to build an ancient version for "Flash" (v8?) to work and too slow
HTML problematic on page size. Nearly impossible to have "pages" filling screen well but not exceeding slightly triggering scrolling. Scrolling is evil on eBooks.
So people generated .png and .jpg images...
Fixed Page width is easy enough on HTML. Fixed page length is a pain.
Was really too orientated for Games.
Companies that installed NT 3.5 / NT3.51 servers in 1995 and held off till NT4.0 to buy new computers saved a lot of grief and money. WFWG 3.11 with file & print sharing off, 32bit TCP/IP, decent graphics and decent 32bit Disk and a few other tweeks was superior to "out of the box" Win95a for Business.
Also in 1996 there was little need for USB in business. Professional scanners used SCSI as did Professional backup etc.
Oddly on Win 3.1 /WFWG3.11 I had a 3rd party spelling checker that worked with ALL applications. Why now does each application have it's own or none and separate dictionaries for each?
I have WFWG 3.11 on CD via MSDN clients disc years ago and about 5 sets of Word 2.0a with licences/Manuals. I copied the Word 2.0a floppies to "gold" CD about 8 years ago.
There are better VMs to run Win3.1 in probably than the Oracle one.
It has been proven by real qualified Radio Engineers and Interference specialists. It's not just "Radio Hams" being awkward (though in theory no product has the "right" to block them either).
Ofcom has ignored their own reports and expert 3rd party lab THEY asked to test.
"They don't work unless they are plugged into the mains, so how can they talk to each other without mains wire?"
But they do. They only need mains power. Run one off a Generator, Inverter or UPS(unplug it after turning on) and with a reasonable 4 way socket strip extension cable and they will connect. The longer the "aerial" (extension cable) the bigger the distance.
The fuse box doesn't block it. They radiate very well from the lighting wiring.
You can get attractive skirting "board" that is concealed trunking and use a "router" to put slots under a door saddle to hide cable. A self adhesive trunking with clip on cover in a corner up a wall.
Running cable around outside of house too.
Convenience and lack of effort / imagination isn't an excuse to to flout international standards. These are ALL self certified using the wrong tests. They are ALL transmitters and ALL fail RFI testing when tested properly in a "real world" scenario and carrying data.
Unfortunately they are or they would be seized at customs. Money talks.
They can interfere with DSL. BT engineers advised BT vision against using them.
Rather than blocking all sale Ofcom only insists on removal if there is an unresolved complaint. That is not a Spectrum Management policy. It's caving into the Gadget maker lobby.
"Try as I might, I couldn't get the Netgear kit to interfere with either my DAB radio or the FM tranny I have in the kitchen. Well-behaving powerline adaptors are 'notched' to prevent them transmitting on used frequencies, and in all instances I've seen of powerline kit causing noise, the receivers have been placed near the adaptor."
Not a scientific test. What is your DAB and FM reception level?
What does it do on MW, Shortwave, VHF Low (42 to 76MHz), CB (27MHz)
When was it decided anyway that only FM & DAB is protected Spectrum?
These are inherently illegal transmitters. They talk to each other without actual mains wire.
If they are properly tested for Radio Interference they fail.
Get some Cat5e cable.
Why in two stages?
If it wasn't for slavery the Steam Engine would have been economic 4000 years earlier...
More than 6,000 years ago?
The predecessors to the Akkadian Empire certainly had fire. There may have even been an earlier "empire" before the "city" of which was likely more than 7,000 years ago as at least a fire burning village.
The Elamite civilisation is about 6,000 years ago.
The only reason we know anything much at all is survival of clay tablet writing preserved because the places got burnt.
If there was a civilisation 10,000 years ago or 20,000 years ago they inconveniently didn't write on clay and set fire to the city. Anything else other than cave paintings would be gone.
There is some suspicion that some cave "art" might include "writing". Which would push back literacy + fire to maybe 20,000 to 50,000 years. Maybe but dating can be controversial.
But can we trust the figures when they post a profit?
If IE9 ran on XP think of the share MS would have :-)
I want clear milestone infrequent updates from Firefox, not the incessant tinkering. Once every 18 months or so ...
Or just when a new standard is released. Can't anyone write SW properly and securely to a standard?
Are Ofcom in the Pocket of the Mobile Industry?
There are various reasons why IPTV can only be a compliment to Broadcast. Technical and financial.
RE "Just to be pedantic: QAM is used on cable, Freeview uses COFDM.
Each Carrier on COFDM uses QPSK, QAM16, QAM64 etc. OnDigital did use less robust QAM to fit more channels. LTE, WiMax and Flash Mobile systems use from QPSK to QAM256 on each carrier on their COFDM system. OFDM/OFDMA/COFDM can use from 30 to about 6700 or more carriers per channel or Multiplex. Cable uses a single carrier for each channel
Technically COFDM, OFDM and OFDMA are really encoding techniques. They all use QPSK or QAM for the carrier modulation.
Satellite OTH uses QPSK or APSK.
No, ALL those can be done by QR code.
The Pill application can even be done easily with EAN code on pills and QR code on prescription to set up the application. Cheap and simple to print a QR code(s) on the prescription.
For the WiFi application "reading over the shoulder" is irrelevant. It's just a simple way to input the password, freely available, but only such inside the restaurant or whatever.
NFC is still a complex solution looking for a problem.
In most cases you only need a unique ID. So in shopping and no need to keep receipts for returns and track back to source the EAN is maker and Product. You just add a second serial number bar code. The unique ID is thus EAN + Serial number, allowing a serial number per product.
Then there is complete traceability and if you used a Store "points" card no need to keep receipts for returns. How do I know? I implemented this already on Printer consumables for a large Multinational. Each item got a 2nd "1 D" (not even a QR code!) code and scanned in on receipt from Wholesale/Maker. Then complete traceability. The customer would scan a Printer/fax/copier and the app would tell him what to get from local store. (s)He would scan it to get it out (next stage would be a Vending Machine type dispenser on site). Old cartridge scanned to recycle bin. This can all be automated.
Maybe Intel charge more.
What are the volumes of chips?
FPGAs have real ARM cores now
ARMs start at 80c for an M0
The whole board with High end ARM running Linux is cheaper than an x86.
Where are the Industrial I/O x86? Geode anyone
IDC must be in La La land.
At the high end running an OS the ARM has been displacing MIPS and x86 for years and growing.
At the low end they didn't exist. x86 can never ever eat that. The M0 and M0+ etc eating into 8bit market except for smallest cheapest 6pin to 28 pin devices.
Routers, Industrial controllers, set boxes Tvs that did use x86 are using ARM, MIPS, ST20 (basically a Transputer). ARM is growing there.
Microchip 18F PIC and MIPs core devices with USB and Ethernet.
Atmel now do ARM cores for Linux OS based devices.
This is laughable. Surely no-one in the Industry believes it, least of all Intel or AMD?
Mine's the one with NXP Cortex M family data sheets in the pocket.
Ironic it's USA/Japan SD resolution (480 visible lines) rather than European/UK SD (576 visible lines) and yet will not work at all in Japan or USA.
This kind of US/Japan market display with a cobbled in generic DVB-T tuner for Aus/NZ and Europe has been about for ages. They are junk. Now obsolete junk.
It's not Freeview. They can be sued for that.
It's only generic MPEG2 DVB-T
It's Obsolete. No MPEG4 or DVB-T2 or DVB-T2-lite
N.I. at end of 2012 becomes 1st place in UK for MPEG4 SD (on DVB-T2 Mini-mux).
Ireland and other countries already use MPEG4 not just for HD for SD (no MPEG2 at all on DVB-T in Ireland).
No MHEG5, so apart from lack of Certification, it can't even receive all Freeview Services.
You can't call it Freeview or Saorview unless it has the Certification/Licence.
Cheap generic & obsolete. Also UK (& especially Ireland) need more than a whip in majority of locations. They wouldn't even be allowed to sell it in France.
Quotes? Of course there is an HTML
<blockquote> Here is a long quotation here is a long quotation here is a long quotation here is a long quotation here is a long quotation here is a long quotation ...</blockquote>
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2018