Re: kids sizes
@Matt : batteries man, batteries! Never a phone :P
149 publicly visible posts • joined 14 Nov 2007
i'm trying to think of popular consumer products that are 'new' in the sense that no-one has ever done something similar before -- almost every device i think of already existed in some form or another before it became popular with the masses.
When we see something become popular its usually a case of 'the right idea at the right time' - The most obvious example of this being most of Apple's more recent products - none of which were unique, they were just (arguably) better done and had that something extra that made them appealing to the broader audience and survived the push into popularity.
Also true for software, for example Angry Birds wasn't the first of its kind by any means, its just another clone.
So, that someone thought up of a google-glass-like product does not surprise me at all, after all VR headsets have been around for a long time, maybe Google is just the first to make something that will be accepted by consumers?
..i like this one the least.
At least other non IT stories on this site have things like bulls being milked, playmobil, warm flesh, vibrating things or a combination of the aforementioned in them, increasing their "hey come take a look at this"-factor.
This story *is* good for some horrormovie script tho
The article only mentioned nanomotors, which makes me wonder how such a device can be controlled.
I cannot imagine someone on the outside 'steering' it or anything.
At those sizes (3 micrometers x 300 nanometers) i doubt they can fit any kind of control-mechanism in using current technology.
Anyways, enough of my rambles, i think i am going to watch Innerspace with Dennis Quaid to get an idea of the future :P
So a ban now will basically get Apple a nice rubber hammer to whack any Samsung phone on the head with?
If Apple thinks any Samsung phone needs to go away then all they need to do is argue it is like theirs and use this case as precedent?
I'm sure something here isn't right
We've done work using very similar concepts about 15 years ago, instead of wifi using sound.
Although the video doesn't mention it i know that this will only work if the receivers have been positioned with accuracy and exact position in relation to each other, with a decent calibration cycle before before you can get any sort of usable accuracy.
Meaning that this technology will only be useful in predetermined areas / setups, in rooms where technicians had time to work and set it up correctly.
NCIS-style-walk-in-the-room-press-a-button-and-see-through-walls isn't going to happen from this any time soon.
Aren't they both state agencies? Why would one agency spend tax dollars to develop something so that they can win a tax-dollars-sponsored price?
Hmm now that i re-read my question i start to think that Nasa would like to have another agencies money - provided they win of course, in the process they end up with something that can be used in future missions, so its a win-win situation for them either way.
Not bad Nasa.
this could very well be the breakthrough similar in importance as the breakthrough from tube to solid state transistors.
It would lift us in a new era of semiconductors, which is a bad name but only for lack of a better one.
If they can make this work technology we cant think of now will become reality.
Right, i expected to find someone in here who would mention Nokia.
AFIAK thats the real bar that other companies have to reach for.
Its so much better, bit bulky though, but i don't think anyone can claim they did something revolutionary without being compared to Nokia's sensor.
no really, if i was him (or at least have his bankaccount) i wouldn't give it a second thought either.
I'd choose boats, chicks, and fresh sea air over a packed and smelly theater room any day of the week, wouldn't you?
the boats go (and will be replaced by, say, formula one cars), but the customers will keep paying regardless :P
These kinds of things are bound to happen.
Different hardware from different manufacturers, working in different manners.
You can avoid a lot of problems by thinking and planning, but, as so perfectly demonstrated here, there is always the unexpected.
Before we boldly go where no man has gone before we first need to take baby steps.
" surely anyone travelling on an internation flight in the last few years has been fingerprinted in some way."
Well at a airport they're not hiding what they're doing, you just *know* that info is going to go into a government database, 'for your own safety' .
But its different on a mobile device, where, besides the manufacturers word, you can't effectively control who gets that information, when, how often, how it will be used and most importantly you might never know about it.
"Why is a fingerprint sensor on an iPhone such a violation of privacy when laptops have featured them for years and no one even blinked? Giving our fingerprints to Wintel PCs and various border control for years but Apple = NSA? This is crazy."
uhm idunno maybe because
1. i dont carry my laptop in my pocket and take it with me whereever i go?
2. i never actually used the fingerprint thingy on my laptop? nice gadget, but no thanks
Actually, aside from this, i rules are meant to be broken. So now they might claim that fingerprints dont ever go to the cloud, but who's to say they won't go back on their word later?
I've heard plenty of times claims being made which where then brushed aside the first opportunity there was profit in it for someone.
after thinking about how there's keyboards that get projected on your desk, others that get rolled out, others that fold out, i couldn't really think why this would be so newsworthy.
But then it occurred to me that it would be nice to have a keyboard as fist page in every notepad, agenda, schoolbooks, etc.
I know how we're supposed to be living in a paperless office (or world for that matter) but in my office we still write stuff down using pens while we have a computer screen staring at us, so we're not in a paperless-era yet.
Not saying this is how they're going to use that tech, but it would have advantages
"You must be new around here."
close to 8 years, would that register as new?
Honestly, never happened to read one of El-Reg's articles where they used that phrase.
English is not my native tongue and i don't live in a English-speaking nation and my interest in Ms Barbara isn't, you know, high enough to warrant keeping tabs on her so that malibu-debacle just went straight past me.
But my goal of learning something new each day has been accomplished, thanks to El-Reg!!
Was looking forward to discover what this means but it was not mentioned anywhere else in the article, leaving me with the burning question "what is it"
"The Streisand effect is the phenomenon whereby an attempt to hide, remove, or censor a piece of information has the unintended consequence of publicizing the information more widely, usually facilitated by the Internet."
And the article was.. uhm.. i think something about the NSA and T-shirts?? i couldn't focus on that, my mind was preoccupied with that other burning question
I remember this application which was popular in the 80ies-90ies, "Norton Commander" or NC for short.
A kind of file explorer back in the DOS days based on a character GUI.
I remember everyone using it, but over time it grew and grew and got bloated until it didn't fit on a floppy any more.
Then someone walked in with something called "Volkov Commander" -VC for short
Now, this was a 100% rip-off from the original, except that it was written by some Ukrainian dude (if memory server), and in the Ukraine back in those days they didn't have the PCs we had here in the west, so that poor guy on his crappy machine decided to write his own version that worked on machines with low specs.
I have never forgotten, and each time something like this comes up i remember VC!
I enjoyed reading the paper, its nicely written, and it has a nice debugger if you're into that kind of thing.
Loved the part where it says "Calling NORMALIZE would have fixed this, but there wasn't space for the call" which just shows how tight everything was back then.
Today you'll be hard-pressed to find people that are adept at designing efficient algorithms of any kind.
"Install more memory" seems to be the mantra by which many designers live these days.
"Get a faster CPU" or "Get a bigger HD" also is exceedingly popular.
I miss the old days
some people might read about it, but the vast majority will probably say 'whatever' and forget about it altogether.
Only if there's a major public backlash and subsequent exodus like there was with Instagram will the be reconsidered.
I doubt that is going to happen, people are too attached to FB to give it up.
"..In 1986. .. We've been waiting for the future for a long time... "
You seem to forget how far we have come.
Chances are that at this very moment you're holding a miniaturized quad-core computer with a very high resolution full color display and capable of receiving and sending digital and analogue communications at lightning fast speeds with others of its kind for many hours continuously. Yes, that would be your mobile phone and most people can't even being to imagine life without it.
In 1986 they would need several rooms full of supercomputers to achieve what you hold in your hand right now.
I believe what mr Drexler described is what he believed to be the ultimate end-goal and achievement of technology. It's simply the limits of his imagination at that time.
Why don't we ask him today, no doubt he will come up with a whole new fantastic view of the future.
The point being that you can't predict what tomorrow will bring. Who ever imagined we could do all the things we can today?
"..mentally moved a finger to fire a cannon in a video game.."
Curious experiment.
I can certainly understand how important this technology could one day become, potentially.
But its weird that they chose to remote-control a trigger-finger for their 1st experiment..
I mean, of all the good uses this can be put to, it had to be tested as trigger-finger for a cannon?
Curious to see what the history books will write about this and how that will reflect on us.
Curious to read reviews about this gadget.
I'm still on my Sony prs505 (from back in Oct '07 when it was released)
Never had a reason to replace it, although i did have to open it up to replace the battery once though.
Now, if this thing can truly stay awake for 10 days i might consider it.
I doubt it will though, as it doesn't seem to have a actual eInk display so it will consume power while you're reading a page (and the machine is patiently waiting for you, a slow and imperfect sack of meat)
Never bothered buying a tablet of any kind just for reading as it wont last alot of hours, and on a long haul flight you will run out juice before you get to your destination.
Its alot of these projects that drive innovation across the tech-world, before they get bought out by big multinational corporations smelling a profit once they are well enough established.
But, for now lets not sour the mood and congratulate this team on a job well done!
Keep up the good work!
Why is he downrated??
I happen to share his sentiment, i never realized having WiFi is a prerequisite for having good holidays.
If having no WiFi is a holiday-ruining-factor i suggest taking a good hard look at what holidays means.
Ofc everyone is entitled to their opinion, but remember that not so long ago we didn't have WiFi and it didn't ruin our holidays then, did it?
i second that sentiment, excellent!
Was about time money was used for something not intended to kill or destroy.
Now, having said that, if they do actually find a meteor/asteroid that is a threat (which is when this mission pays off) they still don't have any means of doing anything about it.
Maybe they should also invest some cash in coming up with ways of dealing with such threats that don't involve Bruce Willis going up with a rigging-crew
As much as i hate Apple..
I don't have a single Apple device, i don't like them and even if i did i don't have the money needed to buy anything they make.
But they do however always manage to make new stuff mainstream before anyone else does.
Yes, the power of the fanboi is strong in this one but i remember waiting for tablet-like devices for over 10 years and Apple managed to get them into our lives without breaking much of a sweat.
Most of what i have scratches and i hate cases. This is also nice.
Trying to connect my MIDI keyboard to my soundblaster on my 386 machine, trying to configure the Voyetra music software to get it to work.
Had some good time there, did not serious or constructive but it represents a nice era when you had to figure stuff out by yourself, no Google back then.
I am pleasantly surprised that someone took the time and effort to probe a consumer device for security holes.
I am pretty sure that the vast majority of devices known in existence have holes in them, somehow, but so few of them have been found out.
Built in 'forgotten' backdoors with root-access? Buffer overflow vulnerabilities? Unencrypted communications over networks? The list goes on and on.
I am not sure how much it matters though, as the average john-doe will still be pretty safe even with devices with holes in em. I can't possibly imagine my neighbor trying to hack my printer to gain access, it seems the stuff movies are made of.
Having said that, I'm pretty sure intelligence agencies are happily making a list of how to compromise your fridge though :)