I'm reminded of the plot of the film "Moon". Did those guys really get to come home at the end or
2237 posts • joined 8 Nov 2007
I'm reminded of the plot of the film "Moon". Did those guys really get to come home at the end or
Everybody wants to wear prosthetic foreheads on their real heads...
The first is a noun (or adjective) while the second is the only proper way to use it as a (phrasal) verb.
Plenty to be getting on with.
fusion/Thorium power generation
The scoops are on their way, bob.
(IT'S MADE OF PEOPLE, PEOPLE!)
(chosen for the "sitting here in limbo" line, but Lord, they deserve to win)
Thanks for that, grumpyoldbloke. If they're being dicks, then I think they should definitely get honorary NZ citizenship.
If so, and if I were in the NZ government, I'd be inclined to give everyone in the Oz government honorary NZ citizenship. Just to foster good neighbourly relations.
> then you just collect a sufficiently large set of primes, multiply them all together and subtract 1 - bingo.
I thought about this yesterday and realised that it didn't work. Consider the product of the first n primes less one. You're basically using a prime sieve, but trying to generate new primes from it rather than doing primality testing.
For a sieve to work on a number n, you have to have a table of all possible prime factors up to sqrt(n). However, the list of primes and products grow at different rates, so you're going to come across a product whose square root is greater than the largest prime in your list, breaking the ability of the sieve to test whether the number is a prime or not.
This happens quite quickly since 2 * 3 * 5 - 1 is 29, and sqrt(29) > 5. Then comes 2 * 3 * 5 * 7 -1 = 209, which is composite with factors 11 and 19, thus kicking the whole idea in the head.
I'll see your Rolling Stones and raise you a Bill S Burroughs... "The Junky's Christmas"
The boy looked at him, his eyes blank with pain. Finally he got one word: "Kidneys."
" Kidney stones?" Danny smiled. " I don’t mean it’s funny, kid. It’s just … I’ve faked it so many times. Never saw the real thing before.
If there weren't any wiretaps, the whole thing goes down the drain.
All it says is that a tap on the Trump end wasn't legally requested. It doesn't mean that there weren't any on the other ends. I suspect that that's why Trump got his knickers in a twist: he feared that his team was caught on tape because some of his unsavoury contacts were being legitimately "tapped". That's the simplest explanation for why his son (son in law?) approached the Russian government to set up a secret diplomatic channel.
Yeah, as you say, "so much for that Russian collusion story".
Define what you think the DoJ means when they say 'wire tap'.
The headline writer gets to use vague language like "wiretap". According to the article body, the request didn't use that word. Or at least not the part that was quoted, which asked about any orders for "an intercept of telecommunications or ...".
Does it mean that they didn't eavesdrop on calls without placing bugs on the phone?
That would seem to fall under what they asked for: was there an order for "an intercept of telecommunications". Doesn't matter if they placed a bug in or near the phone or got the phone company to patch in for them.
A handy mnemonic for remembering -ice vs -ise is that if you're on the fence about spelling, remember that "fence" is a noun. Works for almost all tricky things like "defence", "advi[cs]e", "practi[cs]e", "licen[cs]e" and so on.
My money's on maths (the latter protagonist here).
Q "Why, sirrah, may a caudled fillhorse be deemed the brother to a hiren candle in the night?"
A "Withal, because a candle may be greased, yet a fillhorse be without a fat argier."
The Constitution of the US and each individual state applies to anyone who is in the United States (and respective state), not just citizens.
The page above seems to agree with you.
Like Alan Rickman, maybe?
An additional problem becomes that you need fuel to keep factories up and running (to make new parts) and fuel transportation and delivery (think petrol stations, among others) requires electricity. No grid means no fuel, at least at the start. Expect that martial law would have to be introduced, with strict fuel rationing until repairs to the electricity grid could be carried out, which, as the article states, won't be overnight. Of course, you've probably also got to power water pumping stations and the like.
In a society like the US with so many inequalities, it's hard to see how calmness could prevail. It's not like POTUS can just go on TV and convince people it'll be OK, especially if he's the one that egged on the attack.
Not me. I am attempting to do the opposite of making people forget about this. Judging by the number of downvotes I received and the great preference people had for my first first post over my second, I can only conclude that people (a) don't appreciate irony (especially the recursive variety), or (b) much prefer to interpret my first post as literally suggesting that Trump isn't fascist enough over the sanitised version that presents a post-Fascist apology for my original statement.
OK, I guess that confusion surrounding irony (or meta-irony) angers people. No argument there.
For the record: Nazis are limp-dicked lizards that use the "supremacy" myth to cover up their basic inhumanity.
By which I mean, "nobody properly believes that Trump is a Nazi" and "Props to IBM for sticking to #MAGA (right until it became untenable)."
Trump isn't even proper Nazi. Not surprised IBM walked away when they did.
Not really. I believe that's it's related to the "no free lunch" theorem, or at least something like it can apply. Your standard fractal generator (eg, Fractint) has various optimisations for calculating the "limit cycle" and deciding whether a point leads to "capture" by the attractor, or how long it will take. All nice for making pretty pictures, but if you want to, say, model the weather, you need to iterate to find the final state of the model. The "sensitive dependence on initial condition" part of "chaos theory" does indeed rule out there being a quick solution without having to calculate all the intermediate steps. Same with blockchains or the Byzantine Generals problem: the person provides a proof of work that they have actually done the calculations.
... whereas something like a genetic algorithm might actually converge to a solution quite quickly.
I don't know if you can use that to characterise NP, but a GA is non-deterministic.
In answer to both of those problems (n!=N and P=0, respectively):
No false equivalence here. No sir.
Ah, you may have proved your program correct, but have you run it?
Practically all mathematical papers use n as a variable. It's impossible for it to be both a constant (n=1) and a variable at the same time. Therefore, P = NP is disproved, and by the law of the excluded middle, P != NP.
> ALL HAIL DISCORDIA
You, sir, are a pope!
I ain't got nobody. Nobody loves me. Nobody. Nobody. Nobody cares for me. Nobody. Nobody.
(sing it, Mpeler)
Especially not Theil, Palantir or Cambridge Analytica.
Our chief weapon is surprise! (because we cunningly didn't mention them in the article!)
I think that the Trump brand is toxic, no matter whether you bought it or paid for it. In other words, not long.
Oh, and by the way, the "race" I am talking about you being a part of is "the human race". Get with it.
There is no scientific definition of a race. The closest word is "landrace", which is nothing at all like what ignorant people like to label as "race".
I am fully aware of what a species is. In that context, I find it ironic that you talk about "talking at cross purposes".
Look up the whole Linnnaean (or other) taxonomic system. There are zero mentions of "race".
Just to clarify that a bit more, I subscribe to Buckminster Fuller's view that a "racist" is "someone who believes in race." There is only one race, here, and we're all part of it. For that reason, I also reject the idea of forming organisations to advocate for one's race. It's a misguided concept.
The part below. It probably slipped under your radar because apart from that it seemed to be a rational post.
Forming organisations to represent and advocate the interests of one's religion / race / identity group is common and acceptable. White people must have the same right to form such such groups as anyone else, particularly where they are becoming an underclass
The false equivalency is between organisations like the NAACP and Black Lives Matter, and, well, fascists. Note that last bit: "particularly [when white people] are becoming an underclass".
I teetered between hitting "report abuse" and "downvote" here. In the end, I downvoted.
Why? Because you are implying the same sort of false equivalence that Trump used when he said "... on many sides. On many sides."
That dog won't hunt, Monseigneur.
You said: "it's really just an attempt to stifle criticism"
Mike said: "To be clear: I don’t personally believe all rational discourse has ended when Nazis or the Holocaust are invoked," he wrote. "But I’m pleased that people still use Godwin’s Law to force one another to argue more thoughtfully.
The man had sacrificed a great deal...
The man sacrificed Chelsea Manning, IIRC. Any updates on this article?
"censorship" is only "censorship" when the government does it. What is it? The first amendment, I think.
A company that fires a guy for saying something (possibly detrimental to their organisation) does not fall under the 1st amendment.
Assange is a knob.
>...seems a bit of an oversight by the organisers.
So, DEFGONE next year, then?
Obviously, we are stardust. We are golden.
> We could consider ourselves space travelers
or a "starman, waiting in the sky"
> we could consider ourselves space travelers
Well, a spaceman did come travelling
> "a computer model of supernovae explosions,"
Your Galactic tendency to conjugate adjectives is showing
> kicked out by a powerful wind
Now you're just taking the piss
> Reminds me of the old saying ...
Reminds me of "A légpárnás hajóm tele van angolnákkal". But then, my mind has been corrupted by naughty, naughty British TV.
> I'll go with January 1st 2019 ...
Probably more like 19 January, 2038. Fucking Millennialists.
> sudo apt-get --annual purge -- follow-rabbit-hole --redpill gnome-exe-thumbnailer
just like the oranges.
(disclaimer: I have no idea about how their juicer works)
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2017