Sell Symbian?
It was open sourced, remember?
752 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Oct 2007
"Symbian will be around for a long time, but as a S40 version."
S40 does not use Symbian OS, it is an OS. Symbian was open sourced, S40 has always been proprietary.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Series_40
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symbian
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S60_(software_platform)
Everything in Internet forum postings is true, especially by those with an axe to grind and a ready supply of straw.
I have an idea, maybe we should do something more to get people to think like us. Anonymous postings on Internet forums is clearly not enough. Start by going door to door with pamphlets. If things pick up maybe later we get to colonize a few countries and teach them the Right Way.
You're saying peace keepers from New Zealand, Denmark, Sweden, Ireland etc. are traffickers, rapists and killers. Probably true. Or maybe you're full of it.
The UN rules would have stopped a recent war that resulted in about half a million civilian deaths, had the USA followed the rules. Instead we got "freedom fries".
But I get it, if you're from the USA, UK or Australia you're *always* the "good guys", never mind what the facts say. For example, US troops in Iraq are there under a UN mandate and they have NOT, EVER engaged in rape or torture, no siree.
http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/04/06/iraq
They paid the state for a service (convenience of the card vs. other methods of identification), so shouldn't they get their money's worth? People complain about how inefficient public services are vs. private ones, shouldn't we hold them up to the same standard in this regard?
"Sorry, Microsoft has a new CEO so you understand why we've stopped supporting Windows 7 in December 2010. Please use Windows 2011 instead."
You are making so many factual errors you must be an American. I've seen enough examples to recognize it's a trademark "argumentation" method in the US.
"Co-conspirator"?
"Coerced"?
"collecting money for the dupe's defense fund"?
WTF? Or do you have some inside information we don't know about? I'm really interested, because as the parent article says, Wikileaks is a passive recepticle for anonymously submitted information. Are you not aware of this, or willfully ignoring it?
Put up or shut up.
However, I don't think the point is that they are trying to keep the secrets. They are trying to stop servicemen having their eyes opened to the implications, and to what friendly people think. Reading the news articles will lead to soldiers getting "demotivated" in their daily work. If they weren't sure they were the good guys before, they darn well are questioning it now.
So. Many. Answers...
1) The FBI doesn't need to bother with planting back doors, so many accidental ones already.
2) The FBI backdoors have been disabled and replaced by Chinese subcontractors.
3) No need for doors ... the Windows are already open.
4) This is just open source FUD, closed and proprietary software is secure! We know because we paid for it.
5) No need for backdoors in Windows - we have Adobe for that.
6) Not worthwhile backdooring Windows - no worthwhile target would use Windows for VPNs or other Internet-facing services
etc. etc.
People have died already. Tens of thousands.
http://www.channel4.com/news/iraq-war-files-death-at-checkpoint
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/apr/05/wikileaks-us-army-iraq-attack
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/oct/22/iraq-war-logs-military-leaks
Please read and watch.
Oh, you mean as a result of the leaks?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-11882092
Yes, they are heroes.
http://www.iraqbodycount.org/
100,000 people dead because of your lying, imperialist leaders is "fairly moderate"?
Keep sending your boys to kill and die in the name of "protecting our freedom". I hope your "national security" is worth it. Oops, I mean oil and government contract dollars.
I'm all for future generations spending their money on immaterial epeen rather than material ego inflators that often
a) are manufactured in 3rd world countries under bad conditions (eg. clothes and accessories)
b) have a negative environmental impact from manufacture/delivery/usage/disposal (anything, but especially eg. sports cars)
Could even have a positive impact on trade imbalance for us Westerners.
Perhaps this is a tiny step towards the Star Trek like utopia where ownership of material goods is no longer the force driving people.
I pay a fixed monthly fee for an unlimited 3G plan, just like I do for *DSL. (Don't be jealous, it's pretty flaky). The operators keep raising the advertised speeds and slashing the prices. 3G data only plans are essentially marketed as competition to fixed line broadband. And people use them as such. Obviously one user with bittorrent is going to make life a misery for both the telco and all other customers.
Now the telcos are crying for handouts because *gasp* people use the mobile network for Internet access - which *double gasp* includes other protocols and content than plain text over HTTP/POP3/IMAP. How could they ever have seen that coming?
First, this is about "mobile broadband" not fixed.
Secondly, this is capitalism in action in the best way possible. Sometimes companies overreach in their competition and there are inevitable casualties. The market readjusts - either the prices come up to cover costs or a new competitor or technology picks up the slack.
The old monopolies just haven't got used to how it works. Before they got subsidies from the government, now they can't so here they are turning to the next possible place to get those unearned pennies. How about they try to charge the customer instead of relying on charity?
Don't worry, you'll get your broadband and it will keep getting faster and cheaper on the long term.
1) Why are the mobile operators not charging the customers enough to cover the cost of operating their businesses?
2) If the marketing departments are to blame as you say, is the answer really then charge *non-customers* to subsidize their bad business decisions?
To me this is all symptomatic of the old government monopoly frame of mind. In a capitalist world there has to be a risk of failure. If these businesses are following an unsustainable business model either they need to change or they have to go bankrupt. Simples.
"we are all members of this country and should protect as we would our own homes..."
Check the URL of the site you're posting on. It's (gasp!) in Europe!
Here's an excercise for you: in your own words, please explain who are your "ENEMIES" and why are they hostile to you?
Part 2: What vital interests have been hurt by the leaked documents, and how have they been hurt?
However, while Scrum doesn't have magic answers to many things (you can't ignore architectural plans etc. as some seem to think) it does improve on the plan-implement-test (I've used up my quota of buzzwords) pattern in many ways. I just picked one favourite improvement from a developer point of view.
Maybe I hit a nerve. Notice I never said developers always know best. I just wanted to highlight how I find some satisfaction that Scrum has mechanisms to protect the developer from some friendly manager coming up with "here's a small thing I need you to do, should only take half an hour" and being pressurized into skimping on quality. It becomes the customer/manager's transparent, conscious and on-record decision to reprioritize: either leave something out of the scope or defer it to later. When following plan-implement-test those decisions are hidden and contribute to budget overruns, bad quality and late deliveries.
Besides, it's often that poor PM's are just trying to make happen what the clueless marketeers promised to the customer. ;)
I agree (and it should be plain from my previous posts) that many agilistas reduce Agile to some silly catch phrases, which is a shame. It detracts from the real meat and people (yourself included?) end up thinking it just means something like "be supportive of your team".
Yes, I can't help laugh at some aspects of Scrum and the religious zeal of some proponents. To keep up the religious comparison, for some reason the Scrum evangelists tend to focus on form over substance - as you point out. One can't just go through the motions and decide they're now "agile".
However, Scrum as a reaction to top-down, rigid waterfall methodology should be seen as nothing short of a developer revolution. Done right, it puts a lot of power in developer hands and really lays bare the pain points (like overoptimistic and overbearing managers deciding on what's possible to do in what time frame).
Shareholder value on the short term, perhaps. Shareholder value on the medium and long term is affected by soft things like perceptions. Companies don't try to outdo each other on their green credentials because they want to be nice. It would behoove Oracle to think about their geek credentials as well as their quarterly profit.
Installing software (including plugins) is just
- Putting files and folders somewhere
- Changing config/registry entries
These are installers running with administrator privileges. Firefox does not have to be running to install them. How exactly do you propose Firefox deny "side-loading" plugins? Whatever hoops you set up can be side-stepped - Firefox being open source it's not exactly difficult for vendors to see what you're doing.
This is about blocking or downgrading competing services like VOIP and video on demand to favour their own voice network / walled gardens / partner services. ISPs have been caught with their hands in the cookie jar already.
Reluctant and health my ass.
Maybe you work for a clean-as-a-whistle ISP and couldn't imagine doing this. If that's the case the props to you.