Re: Im just wondering
"If we are bouncing up and down through time, why does part two always follow part one?"
Give them to E4, then see what random order they play the episodes in.
2773 publicly visible posts • joined 1 Mar 2007
At least, the reboot, was pure fantasy by the final series when it went all mystical.
Even the relatively sensible earlier episodes needed suspension of disbelief over minor things - how did 20th century motor vehicles find their way to their world? In a system with limited resources, how could it possibly be more economical to make notepaper with chamfered corners rather than rectangular?* (did they use the offcuts to power the engines?)
* I know that one was actually an in joke about the production team always cutting corners.
"You seem to have pointed out quite a number of films more than TV series"
Call me old fashioned, but I was actually pointing out the books (the dates were publication dates, not film release dates), although almost all were subsequently turned into films - I think The Crysalids was only ever adapted into a radio play.
Star Trek may have tried to be utopian, but Bob H appears to be discussing other series since he namechecks two of them and suggests 'current trends'. Since there hasn't been a new episode of any version of Star Trek (excluding the recent movies - are they 'canon'?), my guess is he's talking about dystopia in science fiction in more general terms than Star Trek.
"I hope it is less dystopian than the current trend in writing has become."
Current trend in writing? You make it sound like dystopia is a new thing. Hasn't science fiction always had a dystopian vein running through it? - for example: The Time Machine (1895), Brave New World (1931), 1984 (1949), Fahrenheit 451 (1953), The Chrysalids (1955), A Clockwork Orange (1962), Logan's Run (1967), Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? (1968), and we haven't even made it to the 1970s yet!
I must be a pants-voyant or something...
From a month or so ago...
http://forums.theregister.co.uk/forum/1/2015/09/26/doctor_who_witchs_familiar_review/#c_2647170
"I wrote a an introductory tutorial to X86-64 assembler, specifically aimed at those who had a bit of experience with the Z80 from the 8-bit home computers of 30 years ago."
Since both the X86 and Z80 are essentially derived from the 8080, the concepts would be quite similar. This task may well be more like someone who has some experience of the wealth of instructions on the X86 being restricted to a PDP8, or having to learn fluent assembly code for the PIC with the most obscure set of on-chip peripherals and registers.
"You know as soon as you see it what it's doing and where it'll jump to; with goto you know none of that without examining the code and finding the label."
That all depends on how much code there is between the break and the end of the loop, and whether the blocks within that section have been indented consistently and correctly - it might just be faster to find the label than have to count the opening and closing braces that follow the break.
(that's not to say I'm condoning using gotos and untidy bracing!)
Was anyone else reminded of the episode where Blackadder meets The Shadow?
"3 - Laugh at them."
Would it be possible, I wonder, for ISPs to recognise extremist web pages and enclose them between
<font face = "comic-sans"> ... </font>
tags (or the appropriate stylesheet, for those of us living in the 21st century*)? That way surely nobody would take them seriously.
* that probably excludes most extremists.
The F1 rules state "Pit to car telemetry is prohibited." so I would imagine that it is possible for a car on the track to be run without the computer systems, however without computer guided pre-race set-up, and giving during the race information relayed verbally to the driver they probably wouldn't run that well.
"Just because it may be internet-capable doesn't mean you actually have to connect it."
Companies employing remote workers will probably demand that they use connected kettles, just so the boss can check up on the number of tea breaks they're taking.
At least beer cans don't have an internet connection ----------------------------->
However, the French courts wouldn't stop Renault calling their car Zoe, after some Mr. & Mrs. Renaults complained that it was already their daughters' name.
The score has three components:f - the proportion of devices free from known critical vulnerabilities.
u - the proportion of devices updated to the most recent version.
m - the number of vulnerabilities the manufacturer has not yet fixed on any device.
But how realistic is this considering
d - the time delay between an update being available from the manufacturer and the carrier being arsed to push it out?
Now, that is a bold statement. Where did they conduct the research?
The works of Shakespeare, I suspect...
Fool: Now Jove, in his next commodity of hair, send thee a beard!
Viola: By my troth, I’ll tell thee, I am almost sick for one, (aside) though I would not have it grow on my chin.
(Twelfth Night)
The error message goes back at least as far as iOS 4.3.1 and people were commenting on it in 2011.
https://discussions.apple.com/thread/2816726?start=0&tstart=0
"and furthermore how Clara managed to fit inside a Dalek case when every time we've seen the actual mutant inside other Daleks"
That bit has precedent. In "The Daleks" way back in 1963 (the second ever Dr Who story) Ian gets into the shell of a captured dalek. I guess you can't get more canon that that.