Re: It is 'that wall' in disguise
I... am... not... jealous...
Seriously, that sounds like an amazing trip. Have a blast (oops that probably tripped the terrorismometer).
4034 posts • joined 28 Feb 2007
I... am... not... jealous...
Seriously, that sounds like an amazing trip. Have a blast (oops that probably tripped the terrorismometer).
But we'd better reciprocate with a ban on flights to the UK to let Americans know just how inconvenient it is going to be.
And whilst we're about it, can we start mandatory fingerprinting of Americans on arrival and exposing them to intrusive questioning by hostile, barely-literate uniformed jobsworths at the border?
If it's good enough for us visiting their country, they can have a taste of it coming this way. IIRC they wailed and gnashed their teeth when Brasil imposed exactly the same entry procedures as were used in America.
But it will have a twerking Ursula the Sea Witch.
Disney is already heavily invested in RFID and the like through their 'MagicBands' which are issued at themeparks and can do things like act as tickets, help create an optimised itinerary and identify diners to waiters. This seems like an obvious next step into their cuddly Orwellian future.
Also, for anyone interested in CGI, display technologies or animatronics, Disney Research puts a lot of different cutting-edge stuff on YouTube:
(The virtual clown makeup is the stuff of nightmares):
Whilst there have been repeated suggestions that petroleum might have an abiogenic origin, including by famous scientists such as Dmitri Mendeleev and Thomas Gold; the widespread presence of porphyrins in petroleum suggests the vast majority of Earth's oil comes from algae and zooplankton. There are tiny amounts of hydrocarbons here on Earth that may have been formed by processes such as serpentinisation or the decomposition of carbonates, none have unequivocally been proven to be abiogenic.
That doesn't exclude petroleum-like compounds forming on Titan and elsewhere in the Solar System through abiogenic processes such as UV polymerisation of methane. And of course, the discovery of methane plumes in the Martian atmosphere is most probably due to serpentinisation of a warm, olivine-rich Mantle by water and carbon dioxide.
The term 'fossil fuel' dates from the 1759 when it was used in reference to the novel process of smelting iron using coal (which occasionally contains obvious plant matter), so it long predates marketing.
Definitely a tip of the hat to the JPL boffins, although I'm quite mystified how they're quite so brilliant without having access to a shed, strong tea and a good pipe.
And the Embraear 195.
At one point I would have thought the Sukhoi Superjet could have been a contender, but they seem to have gone quiet since they had a crash in Indonesia during a demonstration flight.
I guess that's where Apple's highly-lucrative dongles division hangs out.
They may look like 70s purple loon pants but those are smart internet-of-things 24/7/365 adaptive cloud connected multi core wearable loon pants - available now for just $999! (monthly service fee applies)
The BP redesign from shield to flower and back to slightly-different shield wonders why it was forgotten quite so soon.
But you can't play Crysis on it.
This is just a ploy by rail companies to make their other fares look more reasonable.
'Some may also wonder why the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority are piffling around with self driving cars. Perhaps they'd be be better off doing some serious work to provide us with cheap and secure electrical power?'
With us falling out of Euratom as a side-effect of Brexit, we won't be partners in ITER and many of the jobs at Culham will go overseas - perhaps UKAEA is going to set up a minicab business?
To practice their parking skills.
I'm waiting for British Airways to officially become just BA so it can lose that tedious 'British' bit - the same way that British Petroleum became plain old BP and British Telecom metamorphosed into BT.
That way they can get rid of all their expensive British workforce, headquarter somewhere sunny that just happens to have low taxes and rake in even more money for selling a third-rate service as a premium product.
Their call-blocking DECT phones are pretty good. My parents were targeted after the TalkTalk hack, I got them a BT8600, cancelled TalkTalk and their lives are much quieter.
Joe Sutter (who went on to design the 747) talks a bit about the 737 in his book.
Boeing wanted to avoid the stability problems associated with rear engines and high tails on planes like the Caravelle and BAC 1-11. So Sutter put the engines right under the wings rather that at the back or on pylons - which lightened the fuselage allowing for six across seating (the DC-9 only had five across), meant less noise and vibration in flight, more rear cabin space, shorter landing gear and easier maintenance at ground level.
Why do you want to know - citizen?
Don't knock the giant Toblerone.
Buying them is my preflight ritual - safe in the knowledge that I will be able to eat something on the plane; and in the event of the plane crashing, use it to beat one of my fellow passengers to death if there's a fight for the last gin bottle.
How do you steer one of these beasts? I assume banking is out because you'll put your wingtip into the ocean, so do you change the thrust on some of the engines?
And if we can have these back, why not spring for the Gyrodyne?
You're not meant to be thinking about Brexit today. Theresa has decided that the national conversation will be about [spins wheels] - Easter eggs.
Either a high-minded debate on BBC1 or a cage fight.
Boeing: SEND MORE MONEY NOW STOP
See Amber Rudd's speech. I mean I understand every word, but I don't have a fucking clue what she was talking about.
Do you have a stack on buzzword-emblazoned Powerpoint slides on how cloud-based machine-learning big-data heuristics can blah... blah... blah..? Are your salesmen equipped with suitably expensive Swiss watches and lavish entertainment accounts? Are you related to any members of the Cabinet? Have you donated lots of money through back channels to the Conservatives?
If you've answered 'no' to any of the questions above then sorry, you don't have a government-sanctioned 'interest' in this issue.
It's almost making me nostalgic for the days when Jack Straw would pipe up about the wonders of key escrow and all those wonderfully interchangeable Home Office ministers like Andy Burnham and Meg Hillier were never off our televisions explaining how biometric ID cards were completely unbeatable and not at all a privacy issue.
It's good to see the Home Office still hasn't the faintest.
It's something I found surprising, but after all these years in which all of our airliner production disappeared and our companies were merged out of existence, Britain is still the second largest producer of aviation technology in the world.
So yay us! And let's hope Airbus doesn't decide to relocate in two years time.
Don't forget, the aircraft builders don't stipulate the interior layouts (they don't even make the seats), the crunching of passengers behind the wing is all down to airliners racing to the bottom.
So far they have $33 million which is probably enough to test that the paint doesn't come off.
I'd like to see something delta-shaped blast through the sky, but anything with Branson attached is nine parts hype to one part reality.
Do take a trip to Everett to visit the Boeing assembly plant. It is utterly jaw-dropping to go into a building and see three brand-new 747s at various stages of completion (all three for South Korea was I was there last month), then go a bit further along and see a line of 777s rolling slowly towards completion, and next to them, a seemingly endless line of ANA 787s.
Well worth a morning of anyone's time - and there's even a little gift shop.
Oh and you aren't allowed to take cameras or mobile phones into the building, which is a shame, but understandable.
'five metres longer than the 787-9 and can therefore pack in about 38 extra passengers in Boeing's recommended configurations.'
Or about 70 in British Airways new 'densified' (yep, an actual word used in cold blood by BA) configurations. Anyone who has previously 'enjoyed' BA's 3-3-3 cattle class will doubtless be thrilled that the company is now refitting long-haul aircraft - beginning with 777s - to 3-4-3 at the back of the plane.
The F35 is the white elephant by which all future white elephants will be measured.
Concorde looks like an economic whim by comparison. Hell, the Space Shuttle looks like good value for money.
I do rather wonder if we'd be in the same mess if the DoD had gone with Boeing's design, or if it is all the additional requirements added since the fly-off that are to blame for this fiasco.
Why Telford never used the eminently more sensible brontosauri is a mystery lost to time.
If it is a large planet, then internal heat would drive atmospheric convection, so thunderstorms could be a possibility.
Despite its distance from the Sun and cloudtop bollock-chilling temperature of 52K, Neptune has the fastest winds in the Solar System at 2200kmh and incredibly active storm systems. The role of internal heat in powering Neptune's weather is shown by the fact its near twin, Uranus, despite being much closer to the Sun, has a much calmer atmosphere. Uranus has no apparent internal heat source, and no one knows why.
The US used to do it almost routinely for CORONA spy satellite film capsules. Although they weighed a tiny fraction of what Vulcan will be returning to Earth.
Arianespace and Roscosmos have both looked at fitting wings to spent stages and have them swoop down to a runway landing. But I'd imagine the weight of undercarriage, hydraulics and wings would eat into the payload, not to mention the strengthening that would be required to stop it bending like a piece of wet spaghetti on touchdown.
Don't forget the other billionaire, Paul Allen, who is building a humungous aircraft to haul a rocket to altitude and then dropping it (hopefully after lighting the blue touch paper). More stuff about his monstrous machine here (don't forget to hum the 'Thunderbirds' tune):
I have a horrible feeling that the government will either a) insist that BAE take a stake in Reaction Engines and the project will die a long, lingering death; or b) vanish stateside like so much of Britain's aerospace expertise in the 1950s and 60s.
Interestingly, the lop-sided hydrogen isotope abundances on Venus show that it lost its hydrogen to space. The tiny amounts of hydrogen in the Venusian atmosphere are highly enriched in the heavier deuterium than regular hydrogen because it is harder for the Sun to strip deuterium than the lighter isotope. Same approach as the new Mars study, different element.
1: the inability of the Venusian core to lose heat through Mantle convection. Here on Earth, the Mantle loses heat by vigorous convection, driving a temperature gradient within the Core.
Venus doesn't have plate tectonics and its crust appears to be highly rigid which suggests the Mantle also may not be convecting. Instead heat accumulates in the lower Mantle, reducing the ability of the Core to convect, so no magnetic field.
The lack of plate tectonics is one of the big mysteries on Venus, but the loss of water to space is probably involved. Here on Earth, water greatly reduces the melting point in the Mantle, drives processes such as serpentinisation which reduce the rigidity of the Crust and it reduces the viscosity of ductile rocks.
An absence of convection might explain the apparent catastrophic resurfacing of Venus between 0.6-0.3Ga when it looks like much of the Crust was reworked. If heat accumulates in the lower Mantle it will eventually undergo a burst of rapid convection to lose that heat, there would be enormous amounts of melting and - well it'd be spectacular.
The second possibility is that the Venusian core is deficient in lighter elements such as sulfur, oxygen and silicon which help reduce the melting point of the iron-nickel alloy in the Earth's Core. If Venus does lack these elements, its Core might have a similar temperature to Earth's but simply be unable to convect.
Mars almost certainly has an iron-nickel core to account for the difference in its bulk density to those surface rocks we have analysed. The best bet is that Mars's core is something like 1800km in diameter.
What is likely to be different is that no part of Mars's core is convecting to drive a dynamo and hence no magnetic field. Mars would have cooled faster than Earth due to its smaller size, so the interior is going to be hot - just not hot enough. We don't know the Martian geotherm exactly, but it is entirely possible the whole planet is solid, although there are some tantalisingly fresh-looking lava flows that suggest limited volcanism has occurred within the last 2 million years.
Or just equip the flying drone with a Hellfire missile and take out the mutt and its owner.
The writing team is clearly up-to-date on events and techniques in cybersecurity. And for that they deserve praise, compared to other TV and cinema outings which claim to have called in expert advice (looking at you 'Blackhat' - a Michael Mann movie too!).
Season 2 is definitely flakier than the near perfect Season 1, and I have no idea what the two scantily-clad Scandis are up to apart from looking very pretty indeed.
But looking forward to Season 3.
The story is also a good warning about the power of overly-broad patents to suppress innovation.
Do you realise how hard it is not to find zinc in Peru? That takes a special skill.
'Not just tech stuff : one has to wonder what this person is doing as home secretary. She's completely fucking useless from what I can tell.'
The point of a Home Secretary is to act as a plausibly deniable method by which Home Office mandarins can implement their pet schemes. They've had this sort of proposal on the books for years (see also ID cards and key disclosure), they've just been waiting for someone suitable stupid and craven to be appointed to the position.
There's also definitely something in the water supply to the Home Office that relatively sane people go in and come out raving like Daily Mail columnists on mescaline.
The FSB, Chinese State Security, CIA and any number of other organisations where people wear cheap suits and dark glasses will pour all their efforts into compromising the key holder organisation. Not to mention every hacker in the world.
The consequences of any breach would be to destroy or fatally undermine confidence in every transaction made by Britons. We could say goodbye to the City and much of our economy.
They would have mentioned that all of the necessary algorithms to build an end-to-end encrypted messaging app are in the wild and encoded into any number of libraries. If the government goes after Apple or Facebook and demands back doors (good luck on that by the way), the ink won't have dried on the legislation before an app is released with all the security afforded by strong encryption and no known owner.
The only people affected by any legislation on back doors will be the law-abiding citizens that the likes of Rudd swear an oath to protect.
The good news is that the people in Cheltenham who do understand encryption are probably holding their heads in their hands as this old chestnut comes around again. They know you can't have strong encryption with a backdoor and have probably explained it a dozen times before - not least when Cameron made the same proposal shortly after the Charlie Hebdo attacks.
This is probably more to do with getting the Mail off the government's backs. Dacre and chums have been merrily laying into Internet companies of late as assistants to terrorists (when its really that Google's eating all their ad money). The Tories never want to see an ideological wedge open up between them and the Mail.
If the government really wants to stop extremism they could consider attacking the various fear-mongering journalists employed by the tabloids who are paid huge amounts of money to tell people around the world that we should be afraid of our own shadows.
The problem seems to be with delays to construction of several American plants rather than anything wrong with their reactors. It would probably been better if the British state had held on to Westinghouse, then we could have ordered a common fleet of reactors for our new plants rather than the four different (incompatible) designs currently being lined up which means we have no economies of scale.
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2017