Re: Soon now...
Cue Deep Purple.
2470 publicly visible posts • joined 6 Oct 2007
The licence fee paid for it to be made and broadcast that time but not necessarily for it to be shown again.
A lot of old material was made with the expectation it would be shown once, and that was it. And the scriptwriters, producers, actors, etc were paid on that basis. With the introduction of VCR, DVD, and streaming the contracts have moved to reflect the new distribution and repeat showings but the old contracts are not necessarily retroactively changed.
See also
https://www.directors.uk.com/distribution/bbc-residuals
While much of the popular older material may be available on Netflix (Top Gear, post 2005 Doctor Who, Red Dwarf, Yes Minister) the BBC Store did offer some old but less popular and less available material - eg Goodies, and Play for Today type material.
It seems while the BBC has been encouraged to make its archives available, there isn't enough interest in them as a whole to make it feasible in online format.
"I thought the North Pole was supposed to be ice-free in 2015? What happened?"
Go listen to the most recent More or Less broadcast on the BBC. Tim Harford will explain to you 1) what "ice free" actually means 2) how that claim for 2015 came to be reported 3) why it's all more complicated than that and 4) the effect of removing ice layer from the seas
I'd like to be able to spend more than £5 on headphones/earphones - not for the sound quality but so they don't fall apart on me - but everything seems to be Chinese (other low cost economies are available) thin plastic and thinner cable and plugs which must have been fitted with blutack instead of solder.
I do try the "are your parents proud of what you do?" angle
But I have such a strong fight-or-flight response* to these scam artists, that I can seldom enjoy trying to get one over on them.
*I guess it's because if I was in same room I would try and plant my fist in their face- for what little good that would do...
A hoover that used less power when it had less work to do is good idea.
Fits in with 'smart' dishwashers, washing machines etc.
Doesn't make it a defeat device as such.
Issue more that whereas vehicle testing has three or more cycles under test, this hoover test had only one - gentle drive round the block.
As the Roman said, 'cui bono'
In the Cold War, there was the allied Western Europe with US behind them. But that was balanced by a Warsaw Pact bloc which could trade within itself on USSR terms. And the Westen Europe became a trading bloc. Then the Eastern bloc dissolved and the Western allied group developed into an EU, and got bigger with several of the former Warsaw pact countries joining in.
The Russian sphere of influence into the rest of Europe has weakened. And if the EU is more distracted by its internal politics or even disorganized or diminished by members leaving, that would put Russia in a stronger political and hence trade position.
Given the French reputation for 'I'm all right Jacques' and general self-interest, I should think that a Le Pen presidency would be more likely to aim to screw the best deal for itself out of the Brexit negotiations thereby prolonging or confounding them to such an extent that UK ends up with an extra shifty end of an extra large stick to hold.
I see your Box but raise you with Blakes 7 episode Gambit wherein Robert Holmes (and let's face it, if anyone can, he could) comes up with Orac's previously unmentioned ability to reduce size.
Sufficient enough for Vila and Avon to take Orace with them into a space casino to cheat at cards, chess etc
Big fines make a good argument to all businesses that - faced with fines as large as these - it's worth taking on an employee or two in order to make sure that nothing like that happened thereby putting the whole business as risk.
And should a firm be reckless to ignore legislation of which it should be aware (Director's responsibilities etc.) then perhaps it does deserve to fail. Same as if it ignored fire safety legislation and it's warehouse burned to the ground.
Or in short form "pour encourager les autres"
It's about the brexit mandate.
48/52 although a win for Brexit is a narrow win.
Getting a (eg) 60/40 split of the MPs in the Tory favour in Parliament can be called by May a "clear mandate" etc and she can ride over last years vote and claim that we're all for it. Rather than the actualite which would be more like a lot of voters were put off by Corbyn with the effect of diluting opposition to Tory voters.
The MOAB is the spiritual successor to British Cookies if WWII. These were cans of explosive that did damage by blast.
The Massive Ordnance Penetrator is the successor to Grand Slam and Tallboy. Weapons designed to penetrate the ground, explode causing a underground hole into which the target falls.
If it helps you, the manager, to understand how your people think and work, and you use it to help the team get the job done without creating division or hostility, then putting handles on workers is probably OK.
If you fail to use it, or misapply it, or use it to control rather than enable, then it's a waste of effort.
A week is a long time in politics. May could be gone within a year (for all sorts of reasons). The populace might have a general change of opinion in light of circumstances in other parts of the world.
The position we start negotiating with is not necessarily where we end up. (For good or for ill) So while EEA membership is not politically possible at the moment, it might be a concept that Europe considers in 18 months time.
"Heavy drinking (exceeding recommended limits) conferred an increased risk of first presenting with a range of such diseases, including heart failure, cardiac arrest and ischaemic stroke compared with moderate drinking"
"Heavy" in this context is therefore anything over 3 units a day for men.
But this sentence makes the blood run cold - "Heavy drinkers had an increased risk of their initial presentation of cardiovascular disease being _unheralded coronary death_ " (my emphasis) ie no warning before it happens.
On the bright side "Suggestive differences included that the lower risk of myocardial infarction in heavy drinkers was attenuated in current smokers" - so that's Farage nailed.
link to actual article
http://www.bmj.com/content/356/bmj.j909
As fullfact summarize it
"The gender pay gap is 9.4% per hour for full time employees in the UK, or £1.30 per hour. It isn’t true just for part-time work or every individual age group, and the size of the gap varies across different types of job."
https://fullfact.org/economy/UK_gender_pay_gap/