Re: On the plus side...
Visa controls? Seriously?
Pigs might fly. Even the bloody US operates a visa waiver for the UK and they're seriously fucking paranoid.
9435 publicly visible posts • joined 5 Oct 2007
The second referendum will be run under the following rules:
1) The ballot will offer two choices: "Remain" and "Sorry I voted leave last time, but I now wish to remain.".
2) In the unlikely event of a write-in campaign to subvert the democratic process, a result of "Leave" will only be valid if it obtains a Mugabe majority (a minimum of 120% of the vote).
3) Polls will be held every Thursday until the right result is obtained.
The one that always cracked me up was the Dutch and Germans talking. In English as, while the Dutchman is almost invariably fluent in German, he's only going to admit that to a bloody German after hell's frozen over.
The actual headline for this article should be: "French make yet another attempt to convince world that French remains relevant as a language. World says 'Meh'..."
We do real democracy in this country, not Eurodemocracy (tm).
We live with the result, we do not keep holding votes until the proles vote the "right" way, as defined by bien pensant soft-left arseholes.
I have to say that "We don't like the majority view, let's not only have another vote but also change the rules to ensure it goes our way" is a new low for Those Who Know Best.
Chuck Northrop was a serious flying wing enthusiast. Unfortunately he never really cracked the stability problem.
Fly-by-wire solves this and the most recent large-scale look in that direction was the Airbus A380, as it was originally proposed to be a flying wing. This would have only required three engines, carried more passengers and had a shorter wingspan. A win all round.
What scotched this approach was the lack of a "side" to attach a jetway to when the thing's on stand.
The biggest problem with the Pogo was landing. It turned out to be really, really, really difficult to reverse an aircraft vertically onto a solid surface without exceeding the limitations of the landing gear[1]. Who could have seen that coming? The results here strongly suggested that attempting to land the thing on a ship in any other conditions than the ship being stationary in a flat calm would be suicidal.
Autonomous systems have no issues here as they can "see" in any direction equally as well as forwards. They also react to changes in situation (moving landing surface, sudden gusts of wind, etc) far more rapidly and accurately than a human pilot can. This makes the concept practical.
[1] a.k.a: "crashing into the ground".
The EU doesn't give a rat's arse about Spain. Germany on the other hand......
If you look at how much DE sells here and compare that to the opposite direction, they really would be cutting off their nose to spite their face by getting into a trade spat.
As the EU commission's answer to German industry saying "Jump" is invariably "Yessir, how high?", the outcome here is a foregone conclusion.
Too damned right. Working as an expat in Europe I was horrified to find that the retailers' commitments ended with stamping the warranty card. No liability at all, it was between you and the manufacturer.
If the manufacturer didn't have a local service centre for bulky items, you were truly fucked.
The EU tried very hard to foist this system on us, but those few countries who already had superior rights in place (like us) refused to countenance this. We still got lumbered with two years' warranty liability rather than the open-ended "fit for purpose"[1] provisions of the Sale of Goods Act which often, in court, became more than two years.
The problem is, as usual, with the fact that EU legislation has to be rigidly framed for Code Napoleon rather than allowing the picky detail to be thrashed out by the judiciary as Common Law allows.
[1] e.g. If you sell a phone on a two year contract, then to be fit for that purpose it must last at least two years.
You have to say that, purely from an engineering view, they have a point about Browning.
There aren't many engineers whose basic designs are so perfect and simple that, with minor changes, they are still the de facto standard in the field 100 years later.
Regardless of what you think about guns, Browning was a ruddy genius.
Rant away about the "EUSSR".......
I'm not entirely convinced that's a rant. It's got a PolitburoCommission of appointed cronies surrounded by their toadies that wields all the real power and stamps on anyone or anything that threatens it. It has a DumaParliament that exists only to rubber-stamp its superiors' decisions while its members draw a "greedy banker" style salary and benefits package to ensure they STFU and toe the line.
It also has a secret police forcesomething called "Eurojust" to step on any journalists, auditors or anyone with a sense of decency who get close to the truth and destroy any vile bourgeois recidivist liesevidence while they're at it.
The resemblance is actually uncanny, to the extent that I reckon anyone who hasn't spotted that the EU is hell-bent on becoming a totalitarian oligarchy must be blind, stupid or both.
The fix would be to adapt the three rocket motors so that they could increase thrust to compensate....
Presumably that actually means adapt them so that any two of them could increase thrust to compensate for a failing third.
Personally I'd have thought that, given the nine on there, adding the capability to use another of the "spares" instead might be a simpler fix.
Again, the networks could do something about that, if they gave a shit.
Don't allow roaming registrations from SIMs issued by networks based in countries that don't participate. The countries concerned would then be looking at either doing something, or having their networks bleed to death from being unable to sell into the corp market.
IMEI blacklisting notwithstanding
....and there's the problem. If the networks made even a half-arsed attempt at IMEI blacklisting[1], mobile theft would go the way of the Dodo overnight.
[1] Which would start with actually working out the IMEI last associated and blacklisting it whenever a customer says their phone's been stolen, rather than just cutting a replacement SIM and letting that be the end of it.
Well there are now. Those are the fat bastard smokers who can't afford to buy a new car, boiler and solar panels and so are getting royally fucked by the tax system.
Blair and Brown made "tax the poor" trendy, but I think it's getting a little out of hand these days.
Of course, were it not for the EU they'd be allowed to prominently stamp "Made in Cornwall" on the packaging of real Cornish pasties. Before anyone says anything here, stamping such on something that came from elsewhere would fall foul of a variety of legislation that's been around since forever.
The EU does not allow origin discrimination of that nature on goods, hence the need for the "protected origin" scheme and the roomfuls of bureaucrats to administer it.
Or in other words, this is a typical EU bureaucratic solution to a problem entirely caused by, er, EU bureaucracy.
They probably don't really. Everything I've looked at recently that allegedly "supports POP" tends to reveal that everything's still there on the server after download[1].
Real POP has an advantage. No data-scarfing bunch of bastards get to hang on to your mail longer than is absolutely necessary.
[1] Connect to the same service and mailbox with an IMAP client and it's all magically still there, despite having been through the download 'n delete POP process.
....at the mercy of your manufacturer and phone carrier to approve and distribute these updates, which may take some timeis never going to happen.
I've said it before and I'll say it again. With the notable exception of the Nexus devices, you'll get one OS version upgrade. Two if you are very, very lucky. Security patches? Yeah......right........good luck with that.
Apparently not the first ever. However, the competition it was built for required STOL performance at low speeds, which H-P achieved using their own system of slots and flaps. While it was one of the few entrants that actually turned up for the Guggenheim competition and one of perishingly few to meet the requirements, it didn't win due to the usual Yank protectionism in aviation.
HP noticed that the Curtiss[1] entrant was using an unlicensed copy of the H-P slot system and complained. Curtiss responded by pointing out to the US government a mouldering WW1 vintage law prohibiting the import of non-US aircraft and had the H-P aircraft kicked out of the country....(!)
Amazing what you can find out using Google and some idle curiosity to follow up leads.
[1] Yes the same Curtiss legendary for being repeatedly sued by other early aviators, including the Wright Brothers[2], for copying their shit. You have to suspect that H-P had a point.
[2] In that particular case, the patent suit led to an advance. The Wrights sued over Curtiss' copying of their wing-warping system. Curtiss got around the Wright patents by inventing the aileron......
Not just them, I've just spent a merry time with a relative's Dell which did exactly the same thing with self-resurrecting shitware.
Nuking the OEM partition and then sorting out the sulks-rather-than-boots behaviour afterwards did the trick.
Dell are staying on my shitlist.