* Posts by Lotaresco

1501 publicly visible posts • joined 24 Sep 2007

This'll be the next thing Trump crows about: Apple assembling servers on American soil

Lotaresco

Re: assemble its own servers

"adding OS (Linux?) "

MacOS Server still exists.

Lotaresco

Re: Wait...

"Apple builds servers?"

They used to, the Xserve range.

How Apple exploded Europe's crony capitalism

Lotaresco

""She took out her pocket computer and scribbled a few notes. It hummed as it connected to the ship's computer to fetch the information she requested""

Niven and Pournelle wrote about this in 1974, but the PADD had appeared in the first Star Trek series in 1966.

At the time, as a nerd keen on building radios, HiFi and various "electronic projects" I can recall snorting with derision at the communicator which was the size of a box of cigarettes and could transmit to geostationary orbit. I cringe when I recall just how cocksure I was that it would never happen. I think that was largely because I'd worked for a month on a walkie-talkie that weighed a couple of kilos and it could barely transmit two miles.

Lotaresco

Re: WIDtf

Ah, voices of callow youth. Way back <fx: wavy lines> at the turn of the millennium Wireless Information Devices were all the rage. Symbian were pushing the WID as hard as they could, WAP was seen as the way to provide information over a wireless network that could be shown on tiny LCD screens (in monochrome if necessary). It reduced most web sites to a cascading series of links that went on forever. It was like using Gopher but with some tiny low-res images.

I had a look at it and wrote a paper "WAP is crap" for my employers. It was fairly clear even then that developments would leave WAP behind because no one in their right mind would want a 96x95 pixel or even a 320x240 pixel view of the WWW.

Lotaresco

Re: Absolutely agree

It's damn them, damn them all. The history of the industry reads like a list of lost opportunities.

Apple make some interesting things, although inevitably all of the things they make are flawed to some extent because that's how life is. No one can achieve perfection. There's lots of room for improvement.

It would have seemed sensible for the handset manufacturers to respond to the challenge and up their game to compete effectively with Apple. To exploit Apple's weaknesses.

RIM had an edge with secure communication technology but didn't seem to realise that there was value in improving the handset and the services. By the time they woke up Apple had got themselves established. Even now, Apple are not offering as good a corporate or government system, but continue to nibble away at that market.

The other makers seemed to mess around at the time doing things like making a device look a bit like an iPhone but without the functions of the iPhone. It was like trying to compete with BMW by sticking some plastic body panels onto a tired old model of car. Oh hang on, wasn't that what Rover tried?

I'm not sure why execs didn't get that this was something that was going to encroach on their market and that further assaults on their market would happen just as soon as another maker or consortium produced something that offered similar look and feel to the iPhone. It's a story that had already happened elsewhere and not just with Apple. Manufacturers get cosy apparently thinking they can do the same thing with minor variation for ever and then the new kid on the block steals their market.

Google caps punch-yourself-in-the-face malicious charger hack

Lotaresco

Re: Source?

"AFAIK a phone comes with a charger. Is the problem someone trying to be cheap and one from an unsavory source?"

Most people have to buy a replacement charger at some time. You may also want one to use in your car or in your superyacht or helicopter. It doesn't have top be a mains charger. Any charger with a USB socket could contain an unexpected package.

Lotaresco

Re: FFS NO!

"There are all sorts of reliable, proven, and simple ways for chargers to deliver more power when needed and reduce the power later."

Yes, and I agree with your sentiments but the problem of BadUSB isn't really tied to the management of power delivery. In fact it's one of the few things we can legitimately blame the EU for[1]. The common external power supply (common EPS) standard specified a micro USB-B connector for charging a mobile phone. Hence anyone wanting to build a rogue device can be sure that the majority of users will use a data cable to charge their phone. Bingo, all you need to do is to build your charger with enough logic to attack the phone via the USB port. Users don't expect to open a charger and look at what's inside and most chargers are sealed anyway.

There is a way to easily defeat this which is to remove pins 2 and 3 on the USB A plug, provided that the charger doesn't legitimately expect some data from the phone.

[1] Please, no EU flame wars. I'm tired of them.

Renault goes open source with next-gen electric buggy you might generously call 'a car'

Lotaresco

Where it makes sense.

I'm very keen on cars and particularly nice fast cars but I have to admit that the Twizy makes a great deal of sense in some situations. In the New Forest there are businesses that will rent a Twizy to people arriving at the railway station. The area has a blanket 40mph speed limit, so the limited speed of the Twizy isn't an issue. It's now reasonably common for commuters to arrive on the train, pick up a Twizy at the station and head home. In the morning they return to the station and leave the Twizy with the hire shop. No need to park a car, no need to recharge. They do that at the hire shop. An electric vehicle does the job, helps to reduce emissions in the National Park and reduce parking woes.

I'm not convinced that this would work in many other places, but the general principle of short range journeys close to bus/rail termini seems a good one. It's a bit of a return to the situation in the 19th and early 20th centuries where pre-Beeching rail reached many rural areas then the passenger would walk, bicycle or pay for a horse and trap to take them the last leg of the journey; only slightly more convenient.

Sadly the Beeching cuts saw track ripped up, houses and industrial building built over the tracks and tunnels and bridges fall into disrepair. There's not much chance of seeing these routes opened again. They would make sense as driverless "people mover" routes as has been done in some European, Korean, Chinese and Japanese rural areas and electric quadricycles as the last leg of the route home make sense.

As Jay Leno said in an interview with James May, we should support EVs where they make sense. It leaves more of that lovely petrol available for car enthusiasts.

Why the UK is unlikely to get an adequacy determination post Brexit

Lotaresco

Re: Divided we fall

"Bin Laden is positively ROLFing "

That's a new accusation about Bin Laden. I can't recall him being mentioned during Operation Yewtree.

Lotaresco

Re: How on Earth did the Supremes come up with that interpretation???

I think you will find that the Supremes came up with:

"But all you do is treat me bad, Break my heart and leave me sad"

Which seems to perfectly fit the current state of politics.

Lotaresco

Re: Who cares?

"with rhetoric that sounds like it came straight from the script of "V for Vendetta"."

Yes, from the wrong side though. I fully expect satire to become an arrestable offence and possession of the Quran to become a capital offence the way things are going.

"Adam Susan is the leader of the Norsefire party, and the ruler of the dictatorship that holds Britain in an iron grip. A firm adherent of pure fascism, he values order above all else and sees civil liberties as unneeded luxuries which are ultimately threats to a secure society. He states early in the novel that he believes in "the destiny of the Nordic race", and subsequently despises anyone who is not white, Christian, male and heterosexual."

Insert the name of the fascist du jour and whichever political party is currently most barkingly pro-Brexit at the moment.

Fake History Alert: Sorry BBC, but Apple really did invent the iPhone

Lotaresco

Re: Engineering change at the BBC?

"The BBC doesn't "do" engineering "

CEEFAX, PAL Colour TV, 625 line transmissions, The BBC 'B', Satellite Broadcasting, Digital Services, the iPlayer, micro:bit, Smart TV services.

There's also the work that the BBC did in improving loudspeakers including the BBC LS range. That work is one reason that British loudspeakers are still considered among the world's best designs.

By all means kick the BBC, but keep it factual.

Lotaresco

There is of course...

.. the fact that the iPhone wouldn't exist without its screen and all LCD displays owe their existence to (UK) government sponsored research. So whereas I agree that Mazzucato is guilty of rabidly promoting an incorrect hypothesis to the status of fact, there is this tiny kernel of truth.

The government was looking for a display technology for aircraft that was rugged, light, low powered and more reliable than CRTs. They also wanted to avoid the punitive royalties taken by RCA on CRTs. It was the work done in the 1960s by the Royal Radar Establishment at Malvern and George William Gray and his team at the University of Hull that led to modern LCDs. QinetiQ, which inherited RSRE's intellectual property rights, is still taking royalties on each display sold.

Lotaresco

Re: Apple invented everything...

"Microsoft had Smartphone 2002 and Pocket PC 2000 which were eventually merged into Windows Mobile and, interface aside, were vastly superior to the iPhone's iOS."

I had to evaluate every phone technology available in 2002 for a government agency. I'm sorry to say that you're wrong by a country mile.

The weak spot for Microsoft was that it decided to run telephony in the application layer. This meant that any problem with the OS would result in telephony being lost. Symbian provided a telephone which could function as a computer. The telephony was a low-level service and even if the OS crashed completely you could still make and receive calls. Apple adopted the same architecture, interface and telephony are low level services which are difficult to kill.

Does it matter? Well, I recall the anecdote of the Italian journalist pleased as could be with his shiny new Windows phone. He told me lots of times about how great it was. Right up until the day he went skiing and broke his leg. He was off the piste by a few tens of metres and people were passing by not seeing him, so he dialled for help (118 medical emergency) BSOD. After several attempts he realised that he wasn't going to get through on 118, so he tried all the emergency numbers 112, 113, 115, 116 and even 1515 for a forest fire. Every time the phone BSOD'd. He tried turning it off an on again - no use. He tried to call his wife, best friend etc, BSOD. He ended up screaming at the top of his voice for over an hour until someone heard him. The phone ended up in the bin and he went back to a boring Nokia because at least it worked as a phone.

Lotaresco
Coat

Re: I thought I invented it.

I invented the needle. I was looking at my shirt that had a missing button and I said I could fix this if I had a needle. I'm a genius, I am.

Top cop: Strap Wi-Fi jammers to teen web crims as punishment

Lotaresco

Every so often...

Someone in authority makes a statement about technology that is laugh out loud funny. This is one example, but I can recall a similar gaffe from a few years ago when the iPod was the scary techno-toy of the month for the MoD.

UK military bans iPods - some places

Which caused an MoD spokesperson to make a ludicrous claim.

"With USB devices, if you plug it straight into the computer you can bypass passwords and get right on the system," RAF Wing Commander Peter D'Ardenne told Reuters."

I wish my iPod would do that.

Yes, there are valid reasons for stopping people bringing USB devices into particular environments but using an iPod to bypass passwords isn't top of the list of reasons to ban the use of USB devices.

Soz fanbois, Apple DIDN'T invent the smartphone after all

Lotaresco

"There was a distinct category of Palm powered devices we called PDAs"

That's something that Apple can claim to have invented the Newton originated the term "personal digital assistant". Newton development started in 1987 and the device was marketed in 1993. The Palm didn't appear until 1996.

The Newton was the device that gave Apple access to Arm and set Apple on the course that would lead to the iPhone.

Lotaresco

Re: Apple? Invent?

"That's like saying they invented fast cars. It's the car that's important. And again, that comes under 'brilliant design applied to existing concept'."

With respect, you are not understanding the nature of invention. It's not even a good analogy. Until QuickDraw the companies producing GUIs relied on the fastest systems that they could to make the GUI fast enough for the users. Even then it was slow and a user would have to wait significant periods of time for the screen to redraw. Atkinson got an interface that was more responsive than the Xerox star to run on a Motorola 68000. Rather than a "faster car" he found a way to make a Nissan Micra 1.0 as driveable and nippy as a car costing 20 times as much.

Continuing to flog your "car" analogy, which is completely wrong in this context, it's rather like Toyota creating the Prius. The car already existed at the time, but no one had designed a car that integrated generators, battery storage, electric motors and planetary gearboxes with regenerative braking to squeeze as much as possibly out of a litre of fuel. That was invention, and development and yes design.

Lotaresco

Re: I am puzzled by the premise of this article

"RIM grew rich on producing what managements wanted."

Apple has played a clever game here because they have worked to meet what management want as well as what the consumer wants. After a colleague of mine criticised some aspects of iPhone security and advised that government should avoid the iPhone until these problems were fixed we were approached by Apple who then spent a lot of time and money understanding the detail of the criticism, proposing design changes and then fixing the issues in the next releases of iOS. They have also worked hard to provide the assurance that government needs that the phone is fit for purpose. The government market is tiny but the security features also appeal to big business, no one wants to think that commercially sensitive information is being compromised.

Lotaresco

Re: mobiles and cars

"For 60 years we saw this circumvented in national car markets - where manufacturers didn't have to give a shit what customers wanted - they gave them what they felt like giving them - cheap rusty shit.. it just needed to be as good as the cheap rusty shit your competitor was also selling."

I think you've hit a nail on the head and missed the point at the same time. Yes the phone market and the car market were pretty much the same in the way that they structured sales. The point you've missed is that the customer that you perceive - the end user, isn't the one that the phone makers and the car makers were servicing. The phone makers provided phones for the networks. The car makers provided cars for the fleet and hire car markets. Sales of new cars to consumers were much lower down the scale.

So a phone had to meet a price point and last for at most three years. A car also had to meet a price point and last for at most three years. So that determined the kind of cars and phones we got. The only concession to end-user expectations was to have cars put into variants to met different grades of management, hence the L, GL, GLi etc badges; each associated with a different management grade.

The change happened for cars when companies decided not to run their own fleets but to lease. Staff were given a band of monthly cost and discovered that the lowest depreciating cars had the lowest lease costs. Hence the rep who used to get a Sierra discovered that he could have a BMW for the same monthly cost. The person who was wedded to BL/Rover cars (such people existed) discovered that a Rover 45 was in the same group as a BMW 520. That sealed the fate of Rover.

Phones were the same. Motorola and Nokia failed to realise that suddenly the end user was important.

Lotaresco

Sour grapes?

I agree that Apple did not invent the smartphone. I think you will find that Apple will tell you they did not invent the smartphone. What they did was to invent the iPhone. What they have done since that time is to listen to both their customers and to some very interesting sources. For example Apple worked very closely with the spooks to design the security aspects of the later iPhones. Still not perfect but the iOS security model is much better than the competition because they have taken into account the design suggestions from the best in the business.

Apple also used their experience with MacOS and the iPod to build a phone that was both usable and based on best practice. This is where the iPhone and Windows phones differed. On the iPhone security, interface and telephony are low level features. A lot of the OS can die but the phone basics will continue to work. Symbian was as soundly engineered. On a Windows phone telephony is handled in the application layer. If there's an OS glitch it dies.

Apple's attention to interface was just as detailed. Yes, the first iPhones were limited and needed many detailed improvements. However compare them to what at the time were mainstream offerings from Nokia and Motorola and the difference for the user is wider than several barn doors. The Motorola interface at the time sucked. Sucked so hard it could pull an Army boot down a 10mm tube. It had, quite frankly, been designed by morons. Even answering a call was a trial, sending SMS an nightmare and heaven help you if you needed to communicate with someone in a language other than (American) English. My wife threw her Motorola whateveritwas[1] across the room after trying to make a call to someone in Germany and then send a confirmatory SMS.

Crowing about the iPhone not being 3g is all very well, but 3g wasn't well established at the time and it might as well have not existed as far as other handsets were concerned. Who could actually work with WAP and the tiny, tiny low resolution displays of Motorola? The only purpose of WAP seemed to be to lock users into the network's ecosystem so they could sell packages with football results at silly high prices.

So no, Apple didn't invent the smartphone. They just built a better phone than the junk being sold by the companies that refused to innovate because they built down to a rock-bottom price and had a cosy relationship with the networks. They also got it right, giving users what they wanted.

And you know what? No one has to like or own an iPhone. As a user you're free to buy/rent whatever floats your boat. Also the market is open to anyone who can design a "better" phone whether "better" is a phone that works well and costs a few quid or if it's one that completely slays the iPhone in terms of features. The only embarrassment is that with a wide open market so many manufacturers are making a fist of it or going bust.

[1] Can't remember what it was. It was blue. It's in a drawer in the barn and the mice have shat on it, which is a sincere form of criticism.

Lotaresco

Re: Apple? Invent?

"They don't invent much, really. If anything."

This is a FRBUM (Frequently Repeated But Untrue Meme).

Apple has invented about as much, and probably more than other companies in the IT/Technnology sector. A responsive GUI? Thank Apple, Bill Atkinson in particular because that was his doing. Although GUIs existed before Apple's interest they were relatively clunky and needed significant computing power to work. Atkinson worked out QuickDraw which had features no one else had thought of (BitBlt, GrafPorts, Regions among them).

Like all other companies they adopt an approach of only re-inventing the wheel when the wheel is shown to be inadequate for the job. However to claim that they don't invent much isn't supportable.

Dodgy dealer on Amazon lures marks towards phishing site

Lotaresco

Re: Reported

"I emailed Amazon Security. No response."

I've had similar from eBay. I spotted several compromised "auctions" on eBay. It wasn't difficult to do. I was looking for a camera and spotted hundreds of ads for the same camera at silly prices. All ads stated that the seller would only take BACS payment and that the "auction" was for a lens cap. All the ads had the same photos but those photos were copied from other places (mostly from Jessops). I let eBay know, their only response was to accuse me of "interfering with a valid auction". When the auctions ended there was a flurry of posts in online forums warning people that the seller was a rip-off merchant and the goods had not arrived.

Amazon, eBay and the rest are only interested in their fees. They will take action if there's a chance that their business could be affected but they will take the line of least resistance. It's often easier to wash their hands than to do anything.

Lotaresco
Holmes

Same old, same old

A few years ago there was an e-shopping site that offered all sorts of electronic tat consumer electronics at deep discounts. The problem being that all of the content had been copied from other sites, including all the user reviews which were copy and paste from the Co-op and Tesco sites. The police were notified.

It turned out to be run from a council house just outside Penzance. No goods. A genuine Pirate of Penzance.

Brexit means Brexit: What the heck does that mean...

Lotaresco

Re: Goldsmith lost in Richmond because of it. Apparently.

>" I waiting with baited breath"

Ah, the language skills of a typical Brexiter. That's "bated" breath and presumably "I am". Unless you really are planning to catch mice with your gob open and a lump of cheese on your tongue.

Forget aircraft – now cretins are laser-blinding ferry boat crewmen

Lotaresco

Person of mean disposition

"A moron in an Impreza"

Bzzt tautology.

" flashed a green laser at my car windscreen "

Some divot was doing the same from the bridge over the M11 at J8A for Stansted. Fortunately he was behind me, but the inside of the car lit up. The mirror auto-dimmed. I reported it to plod who seemed to not give a damn, not even when I pointed out that he was probably there to target aircraft landing at Stansted. Even more galling is that the police have a traffic outpost at Birchanger so arresting the idiot would have been child's play.

Florida Man sues Verizon for $72m – for letting him commit identity theft

Lotaresco
Coat

Re: 37 priors? - time to pull the plug on this one

Wouldn't it be better to plug his chair in?

Lotaresco

I wonder how impressed the Judge is...

That Kelly gets his name wrong?

Also Kelly seems to suffer from the problem of the poorly educated that "herein" is assumed to be some sort of talisman that makes a document more legal if you use it and use it often.

This is reminding me of the case of Bunt vs Tilley and others. Bunt sued Tilley and the others for libel and damages relating to all sort of things including IIRC impotence. He tried to sue each of their ISPs also claiming that their libels were the responsibility of the ISPs. Bunt had asked for advice before embarking on this self-litigation but chose to ignore it. The advice was that Tilley et al had libelled him but this did not make the ISPs culpable. Also Tilley et al were as poor as church mice so not worth pursuing in court. The end result was a spectacular shot foot as the Judge ruled that the ISPs had no part in the libel and made Bunt pay their costs. That bankrupted Bunt.

At least this proved that the UK does have people of equal stupidity to litigants in the USA.

Lotaresco

"I'm suing the person that I ran over for leaving a dent in my car!"

I wouldn't laugh. A few years ago a motorbike rider chose to ignore a "STOP" sign and drive across a dual carriageway at a junction. They hit the passenger door of my car and knocked themselves out (but fortunately lived). The police investigated and determined it was the biker's fault for ignoring the sign. Later the rider sued me for the damage to his bike.

Russia to convicted criminal hackers: 'Work with us or jail?'

Lotaresco

Re: so far not reported

"we have a regular phrase Poacher turned gamekeeper. And a long tradition of applying it in this very field."

I beg to differ. Firstly the so-called poachers have low skills. Not just the fact that they were caught, but their general approach is the equivalent of smashing a car window to grab a pound coin from the centre console. Secondly they aren't good people to use. Not only can they not contribute much but they tend to be massively over-confident, loose-lipped and unlikely to be able to pass even basic security clearance checks. Yes, like "Curador" they think they are god's gift to hacking, but there's no evidence to support their self-assessment.

There are schemes in many countries to develop "cyber-offensive" capabilities. These tend to focus on selection of appropriate talent, a detailed knowledge of networking, operating systems and applications will get one further here than a quick and dirty hack. The selected candidates are then in for the "cyber" equivalent of boot camp. That way a government can turn out what it needs, knowledgeable specialists who are appropriately loyal to the state.

Poacher turned gamekeeper only works if the poacher doesn't see any profit in being a gamekeeper who poaches on the side and uses his privileged access to take the best game.

Nutanix releases fifth version of Acropolis

Lotaresco

Good news but

The pragmatic side of me says "Wait for version 5.1"

Apple sued by parents of girl killed by driver 'distracted by FaceTime'

Lotaresco

Re: So how?

"So how does the phone detect if it's the driver or a passenger using the phone."

Well Waze does it in a simple minded but effective way. If you try to enter address details while driving it puts up a timed dialog box that tells you not to input text while driving. It also refuses to let you enter text and simply counts down then reverts to navigation.

To ensure that anyone who is a passenger in a vehicle can use the app the dialog box has a "passenger" button. Of course the selection of this option is recorded. If you use it as a driver there is then evidence that you deliberately chose to over-ride the safety warning. This is not going to look good in court.

Lotaresco

Re: Ramp

"There are other ways to survive being rear ended at high speed."

I had a bet with myself before clicking the link that it would be a crash cushion. I won. I used to work designing roadside electronic systems for the HA and was around at the time these were introduced. They have saved the lives of mobile workers several times now. You still have to wonder at the driving skills of someone who can plough into the back of a massive truck with reflective markers, flashing lights and a massive illuminated arrow showing which side to pass.

MPG may be an issue, also the cost of an MOT test and the shortage of places to put the weekly shop. Parking at Lidl could also be a headache. As you say, costs more to run than the average family car.

The Texas solution would be to drive a Yukon or an Expedition though which probably cost as much to run.

The ones I recall looked bigger than the one you linked to. I remember that the drivers wanted a huge pay increase to sit in these things. Despite the impact absorbing features it's still not nice to have a car plough into the back of one of these and the driver can still die if they are hit by an LGV.

Lotaresco

Re: Sad

Before suing Apple, the family should be suing the state of Texas which permits drivers to use their mobile phones while driving. Because Freedom! presumably.

Lotaresco

Re: Apple have a patent for a system that would have prevented this.

"By the same token Toyota have the tech available to them that would have stopped the car running in to the back of them at such a speed (if at all) and prevented this accident."

Do they also have a time machine that would let them go back and retrofit the system to an antique SUV? They call it the 4runner for a reason, it was an old design when it was new.

Lotaresco

I live in Texas

"Yee", and if I may so sir, "Ha!"

Lotaresco

Religious sedan

"If you're as obsessed with IIHS.org crash tests as I am... Still, while I am a religions sedan owner"

If you're a religious sedan owner shouldn't that be IHS.org?

And what does a religious sedan look like?

Lotaresco

Re: Lawyers...

"I have seen an innocent man walk from from child molestation charges because my mother (a barrister) defended him"

And I have seen an abuser walk free from court and a paedophile escape with just a slap on the wrist because an excellent barrister defended them. Unfortunately the criminal law is a blunt instrument that presumes innocence, hence bad people walk free. If you recall Kenneth Noye walked free from court after killing a police officer, later he murdered Stephen Cameron.

My fortnight eating Blighty's own human fart-powder

Lotaresco

Re: Reverse Osmosis

"Bad water in the borehole "

It depends which near-desert is being discussed. Across much of the American desert and badlands the water from boreholes will kill you sooner or later. Arsenic contamination is common in these regions at a level that doesn't kill but does cause cancer. The water can also be briny or just have an awful taste. RO water is better but may need the addition of minerals, especially iodine.

Lotaresco

Re: Hipsters discover SlimFast...

"there is no basis in fact for making that claim."

Correct.

I think what's happening here is that people want to believe that they can slurp down some gruel and that life will be fine. If someone has got to the stage of thinking that food is just fuel then a I pity them.

Lotaresco

Re: Where's the IT angle?

"I am biased as I have gone through the afore mentioned subjects to a degree level before converting to IT"

Blimey YMYA.

I'm sort of laughing at the person who claimed I know nothing about nutrition, and at the concept that it's possible to produce a "shake" that has all the essential nutrients. Given that we're still learning what the essential nutrients are and that beige powder has no flavonoids I think it's a reasonable guess that it's about as nutritionally complete as a beer mat.

Here's a clue kids, beige food is bad for you, that's the law.

Lotaresco

If I could prepare proper meals every day I would

Hang on. In your last whine fascinating article. You observed that you would like someone to give you an income for doing nothing on the basis that you don't have a job or any prospect of getting one. One is drawn to conclude therefore that there is infinite time available for the preparation of a decent meal. Also given a constrained budget, the use of ready meals of any variety is the worst economic choice possible.

Comments about lassitude and inability to raise a finger coupled with feeling better after getting some calories inside you lead to a suspicion that what you need isn't packet superfood but some basic nutritional advice.

Cooking a decent meal isn't hard, doesn't require huge amounts of energy in terms of fuel or human effort and eating regular healthy meals is the best way to restore health after a period of illness.

Go and get hold of a copy of "Cooking in a bedsit" and use it.

PS: The tone of this article is very much like "product placement" in that it has no relevance to the theme of The Register and it's pushing a single trademarked product.

Lotaresco
IT Angle

Where's the IT angle?

Other than proving that most people involved in IT are too idle to learn how to cook, that is. I had a look at Huel at the time that the company was prolifically spamming Faecebok. As a former scientist turned IT droid for many, many decades I was completely and utterly underwhelmed. It's simply flour of pulses and grains with added flavouring.

You could get a better meal, for much lower cost simply by learning the lessons of our ancestors and stocking up on dry goods. A slow cooker would also help.

I've chosen to live in isolation myself, not as isolated at the Highlands, but it's six miles in any direction to a shop. So our food economy consists of stuff we grow ourselves, dried goods bought in bulk and collected when we make trips to civilisation or delivered from Amazon. We also stock up on "ambient storage" foods in what my wife calls "the nuclear winter cupboard".

I have a deep loathing of these "shakes" on the grounds that the taste makes me want to retch and I don't think that the human race evolved to suck on pap all day long. Keep going on this stuff and I suspect scurvy is on the agenda.

Uh-oh. LG to use AI to push home appliances to 'another dimension'

Lotaresco

You know what you can do LG?

Yes that's right. It does involve sex and travel.

Top-Secret-cleared SOCOM medics hit in 11GB govt database leak

Lotaresco

Event the redacted password image has enough information still available to start a little OSINT research

Mr Thomas W Burden FACHE still works for the company.

Lotaresco

Re: Encryption, please?

"if the data had been encrypted"

For Top Secret data this isn't the panacea that many imagine it to be, no commercial encryption meets the requirements for Top Secret.

"seeing a hand-written list of programs, user names, and passwords, just doesn't fill me with confidence"

The fact that you are seeing it doesn't fill me with confidence.

The fact that several different accounts and services are listed on the same sheet doesn't fill me with confidence.

The use of a paper based password log doesn't worry me. If you think about it if that log were in a safe designed to the appropriate standard it would not be accessible to a hacker. I'm also shocked that some dweeb didn't understand why passwords were recorded on paper and chose to scan the sheet and put it on an insecure system.

What also shocks me is the list of commercial services used, including QuickBooks. For special operations? That's careless to the point of criminal negligence. Someone's sensitive parts should be in a mangle for this. Just think, if the US is this bad at national security, should you be sending any of your personal data to the USA?

Networks in 2016: A full fibre diet for UK.gov

Lotaresco

Hmmmm

Well you may think it's BT bashing but OpenReach have shown some bizarre behaviours in recent years. For example I recently saw OpenReach pull fibre along 12 miles of country road that passes through a number of villages, none of them with decent broadband. I asked one of the engineers if this meant a possibility of getting FTTP along the route. No, of course not. OpenReach wanted to join a city to a large market town. No plans for anyone in the sticks to benefit from the pipe that runs just 24ft from their home/the local exchange. Since then I've been told that the plan to provide fibre to any of these villages is "never".

Lotaresco

Re: An easy first step

"would be that all those new 'Starter Homes' and 'Garden Villages/towns' (and even all new homes) must be built with

- Fibre to the Premises

- Solar PV on the roof.

Can someone remind me what the appropriate emoticon is for long, uncontrollable, hollow laughter?

My home is close to the proposed location of four of these "Garden Villages" each of which will be several times the size of any of the nearby market towns. There are no services and there's no consideration that Hampshire is short of water. The infrastructure planning is non-existent.

The locations seem to be so poorly chosen (one is in the green belt and is an ex-military test track) that there's more than a whiff of "big bung may be associated with this decision" about the whole business. For "Garden Village" read "packed-in cardboard boxes without gardens".

Virgin America mid-flight panic after moron sets phone Wi-Fi hotspot to 'Samsung Galaxy Note 7'

Lotaresco

Re: Some talk common sense, some talk shite

"While the probability of the Note 7 catching fire may well be low, it is still a possibility that is can happen. "

It is a combination of several things. The fire risk, yes. LiIon batteries are pressurised and have a flammable electrolyte. At altitude the batteries are stressed because the pressure differential from inside to outside is greater than at sea level.

If a battery catches fire not only is the fire a hazard but the gasses vented from the battery are toxic or irritant. In a closed tube such as an aircraft hydrogen fluoride, hydrochloric acid and sulphur dioxide are serious concerns and they can't be purged from the aircraft easily in flight.

Then there's the consequences of the battery leaking. The electrolyte is corrosive, particularly so when in contact with aluminium. That's aluminium, the thing that most aircraft are made from. Even a small leak can cause unseen structural damage to an aircraft and suspicion of a leak means and expensive inspection of the aircraft structure is necessary.

And you have it right about risk. Humans are really bad at risk assessment. The majority always put their convenience and their pleasure ahead of the risks they cause to themselves and others.

The GN7 was bursting into flames at the rate of 112 a month. Samsung claimed that only 1,000 phones were affected in total, but they have no way of knowing that. At the rate they were bursting into flames (there's every sign that rate was increasing, rather than decreasing) then it's reasonable to extrapolate to a *minimum* 5,000 phone failure over three years and, given the fact that the batteries are aging over that time, that's likely to be an underestimate. So a probably 0.5% failure rate over the life of a handset.

Now some may argue that's "very low" but in terms of safety engineering that's an appalling failure rate. Take, for example a Boeing 737. To-date these aircraft have flow approximately 192 million flights with 74 fatal events. A failure rate of 0.5% would imply 960,000 events. True we don't know what proportion of those events would be fatal, but I think it's reasonable to say that we would have to be very lucky indeed for only one in 10,000 fires to result in a fatality.

And that's for just one phone per aircraft. If someone else has the same flammable phone the probability of a failure doubles.

Raspberry Pi Foundation releases operating system for PCs, Macs

Lotaresco

Re: And it appears to be 3D skeuomorphic!

"Technical people are not the major use-case for Office, it is business that demands it."

Indeed, although it does have some useful features for technical uses. The problem being that MS can't make it's mind up about what features to offer and bungles some of its attempts. Hence versions of Office around the turn of the millennium supported the inclusion of other files, so that it was possible to create large document sets such as engineering manuals, but impossible to print them because (a) Word fouled up page numbering and (b) the Windows print drivers choked and halted printing after a few hundred pages. The fix of forcing users to create one giant document isn't exactly a great one for multi-author working.

Libre Office is mostly all of an Office product that most users need or could cope with. However every dim-witted business manager seems to feel that he (it's always he) must have the largest, fastest PC IN THE WORLD! on his desk and it must be equipped with a full-fat version of Office even if all he does is type one line memos in Word and tot-up his expenses in Excel. I've proved to clients over and over again that all they need is Libre Office and they just ignore the advice.

"But sadly I have to use MS Office for some projects as its the only one that maintains correct layout."

I'd grumble about that statement. Office in my experience fouls up layout over and over again. I guess what you refer to is that it's impossible to move documents between MS Office and Libre Office without having serious formatting issues and incompatibilities. Oddly Writer does a much better job of calculating fields than Word and having used it to calculate invoices it's good enough to use for lightweight SOHO needs.

I'm wondering though what the recommendation would be for "technical" use. Probably LaTex, I guess <shudder>. Whever it gets down to document processing I always meet some wild-eyed crazy-haired obsessive who will witter on for hours about how he (it's always he) has created a mighty technical documentation system in LaTex which oddly enough only he can understand or maintain. When they eventually do manage to get a printed copy out it will be awful with horrid layout, horrid fonts and ugly illustrations poorly positioned. I find it best to persuade these people to do something more suited to their talents.