Re: Grand Jury...
Don't forget that Joe Public has a chance to decide the case under the UK system. It's called a jury. There is also scope for a preliminary hearing to evaluate the case and this is not only an open procedure, it's also a proceeding in which the accused can challenge evidence.
Not much chance of conviction? Then you're not charged as going to trial is 'Not in the public interest' i.e. too expensive.
Maybe there are other issues apart from expense. Imagine ou find yourself accused of something you didn't do. What would be your preference for avoiding the risk of being put on trial - a grand jury with prosecutors presenting evidence in a proceeding in which, without your ability to defend yourself, they're trying to persuade a bunch of laypeople of the case or one in which (a) experienced lawyers can decide the evidence isn't convincing and (b) a preliminary hearing in which you can challenge the evidence?
Biting the hand that feeds IT
