Reply to post: Re: Why isn't any one offended men were required to wear a blazer and slacks or suit?

Hey GitLab, the 1970s called and want their sexism back: Saleswomen told to wear short skirts, heels and 'step it up'

LDS Silver badge

Re: Why isn't any one offended men were required to wear a blazer and slacks or suit?

The problem is you not tell people what to wear - you tell people the type of the event (i.e. formal, casual, etc.) and then let people choose what to wear.

Morons - of any sex - will choose the wrong attire, and show what they are. There are many ways to look vulgar, and a few ones to look elegant.

But in no way you force someone to look like sexual prizes for someone else.

And frankly, I wold like to see some man forced to wear like Tarzan when they look far more like Cheeta.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR WEEKLY TECH NEWSLETTER

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2020