Admission that they're in fact routinely view the video footage?
"the attempted access to that data exceeded what was necessary for their job functions"
Looks like they still can't quite admit their guilt. "Attempted" access? Most people won't use that term when they in fact succeeded.
However, what's most glaring is the seeming admission that they are in fact 1) able to view the videos and 2) that it may be routine if it is "necessary for their job functions".
I'd love to see the internal documents that detail when the company deems it acceptable to view the video footage.