Reply to post: He has also clearly caused significant costs to be incurred by the defendant.

High Court dismisses nameless Google Right To Be Forgotten sueball man... yes, again

JimmyPage Silver badge
WTF?

He has also clearly caused significant costs to be incurred by the defendant.

How ? In the name of all that's holy, how ?

English law is designed to keep poor people out of the courts as plaintiffs. So how has this character managed to drag one of the worlds biggest companies into court 10 times without having to put up some sort of bond ?

If you or I tried to sue Google, the very very very first thing that would happen is their brief would simply file a motion asking that the court obtain assurances that we could pay Googles costs if we lost.

So WTF is going on here ?

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR WEEKLY TECH NEWSLETTER

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2020