Reply to post:

Nix to the mix: Chrome to block passive HTTP content swirled into HTTPS pages

Zippy´s Sausage Factory

How can anything be 255% slower than something else? Yes, it may have taken 255% of the time, but that's dividing the wrong way surely? Shouldn't it be 72% slower because http/2 only took 28% of the time of http? Or am I just being picky?

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR WEEKLY TECH NEWSLETTER

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019