Re: So, to sum up. . .
> drag out things Johnson said long ago
Yes, because he has been telling outrageous lies about the EC and the EU throughout his career.
> something entirely constitutional to honour the biggest vote for anything ever
As the population has been constantly increasing, more voters than ever is irrelevant. What is relevant is that only 37% of those voters voted for a change and they did it based on outrageous lies from Johnson and his rich, privileged friends. BTW it was not a decisive vote, it was only advisory; constitutionally sovereign power remains with Parliament. If anyone has behaved unconstitutionally, it is Johnson and his cronies, who must have put undue pressure on a 93 year old person in the process. She should have said no, which is certainly her constitutional prerogative.
Biting the hand that feeds IT
