Reply to post:

Squabbles over NASA's lunar lander, Astrobotics takes a punt on ULA and India arrives at the Moon

phuzz Silver badge
Facepalm

NASA in the 1970's: Let's build a really efficient engine for the Shuttle, it doesn't matter if it's expensive because we'll be bringing them back after each flight.

NASA in 2010: We need an engine for the SLS, let's use the RS-25. Who cares if we're throwing them away into the ocean after each use?

(They're planning to use ex-Shuttle engines for the first flights of the SLS. Taking what would otherwise have ended up in museums and dropping them in the Atlantic.)

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon