dodgy images
Were those actual dodgy images, or given he was a 16 yo at the time of that conviction, were they just images of his gf / bf / whatever term used.
Given that there's the legal screwup in UK that 2 16 yos can have sex legally, but if they have sexual mages of themselves at that age (under 18) then its illegal child pr0n.
Given there's sometimes the mentality of creating as many charges as possible against someone I did cynically wonder (if it was just them and a partner imagery then its a bit evil as CP conviction is likely to make any time in jail rather unpleasant & protests about conviction not being what it appears don't necessarily get a considered hearing in E wing)