Reply to post:

You're not Boeing to believe this, but... Another deadly 737 Max control bug found

ForthIsNotDead
Boffin

"That's the thing. I've long preferred Boeing because Airbus believes that the plane should override the pilot when it (mistakenly?) "thinks" the pilot is screwing up. Boeing was supposedly the one that believes that automation is there to assist the pilot, not to overrule him and substitute its judgment for his, and yet here we are."

I was under the impression that the reason for that is that the plane is quite unstable in flight due to the engines being moved forward (for efficiency reasons) and thus assistance from computers was *required* to keep thing in air, no?

Am I over-simplifying it?

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR WEEKLY TECH NEWSLETTER

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019