Reply to post: Re: "triggers an exception that can't be handled and the CPU halts"

You're not Boeing to believe this, but... Another deadly 737 Max control bug found

Mike 125

Re: "triggers an exception that can't be handled and the CPU halts"

>I'm pretty sure that if the CPU halts it will be rebooted pretty sharpish.

CNN says:

'In simulator tests, government pilots discovered that a microprocessor failure could push the nose of the plane toward the ground. It is not known whether the microprocessor played a role in either crash.'

I suspect the 'revised' tests force a processor STOP, just to see what happens. Unfortunately, what happens is an aircraft STOP. Hence multiple redundant systems. I bet no tests like that have been done before on this system.

Watchdogs: I've seen a tickle done from a timer interrupt handler. And for his Full Gold Star, the engineer actually claimed he was being clever.

>When I was working with people writing diesel engine controllers 15 years ago

A lot's changed in 15 years, and none of it good.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR WEEKLY TECH NEWSLETTER

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019