Reply to post: Re: Proof (as if proof were needed)

This isn't Boeing to end well: Plane maker to scrap some physical cert tests, use computer simulations instead

Anonymous Coward
Anonymous Coward

Re: Proof (as if proof were needed)

"per AF296."

You mean where the plane did what the crew told it to do... so not an issue with the automation in the slightest!

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR WEEKLY TECH NEWSLETTER

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019