"It also noted that WikiLeaks published "the unredacted names of human sources who provided information to United States forces in Iraq and Afghanistan, and to US State Department diplomats around the world.""
I could be wrong, it's been a fair while since the documents were released, but didn't he (or wikileaks at least) offer to retract the names of anyone who might be put at risk and the state department refused to assist with it because it would lend credibility to the leak?
Biting the hand that feeds IT
