Reply to post: Re: they need "reasonable suspicion"

Hey, those warrantless smartphone searches at the US border? Unconstitutional, yeah? Civil-rights warriors ask court to settle this

Aristotles slow and dimwitted horse

Re: they need "reasonable suspicion"

But I would suspect that most of the time they don't have reasonable suspicion. Considering that your average border guard is a failed police officer, or generally someone who wants "any level of authority that they can get" can get, your reasonable suspicion generally turns into "anyone I have personal prejudices against" - and that just aint right.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon