Reply to post: Re: To have complex handling is not the same as to have poor dynamics

Boeing big cheese repeats pledge of 737 Max software updates following fatal crashes

W.S.Gosset Bronze badge

Re: To have complex handling is not the same as to have poor dynamics

> that fighter jet is perfectly balanced

No, it is UNstable. It can NOT fly without CONSTANT inputs correcting its instability, its fuckups.

It is SO unstable, no human can respond fast enough to its fuckups to avoid it crashing immediately.

Hence, a computer constantly corrects its fuckups to keep it on a given stable 3Dvector, and applies an algorithm to the human pilot's jigglings of hte controls to work out the intended change to the vector, then adjusts to that new vector.

And it is not the only one. A number of fighters have been built this way in the last 30 years.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019