Reply to post: Re: Windows version numbering

Linux 5.0 is out except it's really 4.21 because Linus 'ran out of fingers and toes' to count on

Hans 1

Re: Windows version numbering

Windows 2000 was a good release as well - as it removed many of the limitations NT4 had compared to 95, as it supported more recent hardware - i.e. USB, laptop power management, DirectX, etc. Many kernel changes came because of that.

That made me want to upvote!

XP had the issue that it didn't support 64 bit systems - XP 64 was a half-backed solution, unlike 2003.

That made me want to downvote.

XP was Windows 2000 + USB2 patch and a resource-hungry toddler ui, for the simple minded audience Windows has always targeted.

XP64 and w2k3 64 were PITA's, driver support, anyone ???

Compare to Linux ....

WoW64 is a mess, 64-bit binaries in %windir%\system32 and 32-bit binaries in %windir%\syswow64, whoever came up with that idea should have been laughed out of the room.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon