Author of the article thinks there's nothing different about Eastern District?
"And that implies that somehow the Eastern District exists in its own special world. It doesn't."
Then why were the majority of plaintiffs seeking to have the patent infringement hearings there? Maybe it's the fact that they had the highest rate of finding for the plaintiff?
In the author's eagerness to cast Apple's move as petulant they've completely missed the mark here. Poor article.
Biting the hand that feeds IT
