Reply to post: Re: The old Reply-ALL

Hold horror stories: Chief, we've got a f*cking idiot on line 1. Oh, you heard all that

Baldrickk Silver badge

Re: The old Reply-ALL

Sometimes I think reply-all should be the default - the number of times an email chain falls silent because someone just hit reply, so vital info just ends up going to the last one to make a reply to the chain.

Sender thinks he sent it, one receiver got it, the rest remain unaware.

It would also be the usual behaviour, so you would be used to checking who the email is going to, rather than just reply, type, send.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019