well one thing
"pipe providers" shouldn't be allowed to be "content providers". A company can be either one or the other, but not both.
That is the only thing in your post I don't take issue with. I actually agree.
"pipe providers" shouldn't be allowed to be "content providers". A company can be either one or the other, but not both.
That is the only thing in your post I don't take issue with. I actually agree.