Reply to post:

IBM insists it's not deliberately axing older staff. Internal secret docs state otherwise...

Anonymous Coward
Anonymous Coward

@ Bernard Orwell

Yes you're correct but you're missing ivan5's reasoning, which was that axing more expensive resources was perfectly fine and reasonable. Whilst he was talking about older workers, I extended his rationale to men.

Today, as you state men are paid more, but in ivan5's world, they would justifiably be sacked.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon