Reply to post: Re: The mistake was to use them for blackmailing intead of simply blocking the domains

Staff sacked after security sees 'suspect surfer' script of shame

Anonymous Coward
Anonymous Coward

Re: The mistake was to use them for blackmailing intead of simply blocking the domains

Reading the access logs is no different from walking over to see what your employee is working on.

Logically and rationally, yes. But the way that the law has been written in some jurisdictions affords employees a right to privacy that then (I presume unintentionally) cloaks activities that they could be sacked for.

Nothing new here - most laws are very poorly drafted, leading to geometric increases in the volume and complexity of statute law, declining levels of understanding of the law, and plenty of unintended consequences. Couple that with cloth eared and slow to react governments, and the unintended consequences snowball - like in the case of tax tourism by large corporations.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019