I think it was the opposite - the pilots *assumed* the plane anti-stall would stop it stalling, but below a certain hight it disengages as it *assumed* they would only fly that low in an attempt to land.
Not a member of The Register?
Create a new account
Remember me on this computer?
The Register - Independent news and views for the tech community. Part of Situation Publishing
Join our daily or weekly newsletters, subscribe to a specific section or set News alerts
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019