Reply to post: Re: "Quality" is a structural attribute, not a bolt-on

Memo to Microsoft: Windows 10 is broken, and the fixes can't wait

BinkyTheMagicPaperclip Silver badge

Re: "Quality" is a structural attribute, not a bolt-on

You're not wrong, but the problem is definition vs usage.

It's like 'loose' and 'lose' or 'less' and 'fewer' in English. There are differences, they are defined, but if people continually use the words incorrectly they become accepted usage.

Continual abuse of the Agile philosophy is making it toxic. As the unit tests are generally written by developers, there's far too much scope for taking shortcuts. At least a more classical development model formalises a specification and testing. Yes, it still frequently goes awry, but if the specification is incomplete it's obvious, and if the QA are reduced, there's no 'agile' excuse to hide behind.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019